DarkMetroid567
Well-Known Member
Another consideration for trains, if traveling solo, is the surplus free time. I had to make it from the Bay Area to the Central Valley this week and ended up choosing Amtrak over renting a car. I’m a lawyer and dedicating 5 hours to driving is really hard to squeeze during the work week. Was a cinch on the train!My 47mpg hybrid can do a round trip from Vegas to Anahiem for $40-45 total. That's significantly less than a round trip on the train.......and on top of that it dumps me off 30 miles from the front gates as the crow flies, so I would have to spend even more money and time getting from Rancho Cucamonga to my hotel in Anaheim. At least if I drive I have a vehicle at my disposal while I'm there for a few days.
The Bay Bridge gets really bad if BART goes down, though. I shudder to imagine how bad traffic would get if we lost all that transit.The Bay Area has BART, Caltrain, Lightrail, and buses, and are the highways less congested because of them? Nope. It still took 30-40 minutes to go 7 miles down 237 in the morning.......unless you want to pay like $75/month for Fastrack.
The Central Valley is so interesting in that I do think it’s the one place in America where the ridership is still going to be great even if HSR is half-built. The Amtrak San Joaquins route is crazy busy everytime I’ve ever ridden it, and it’s my impression that service from Merced to Bakersfield will be replaced by CAHSR once HSR opens.I suspect when the CSHR finally opens its first phase it’s going to have the same problem, very few people are going to use a HSR that’s limited to the central valley, without a connection to LA and SF it’s never going to make sense.
And San Joaquins is a very mediocre service. I think CAHSR will attract a lot of ridership once people see the time savings.