Disney Analyst
Well-Known Member
This lights on video shows me that there is clearly a similar amount of room here as Disneyland… so why could he not go there?
This lights on video shows me that there is clearly a similar amount of room here as Disneyland… so why could he not go there?
View attachment 886534
This lights on video shows me that there is clearly a similar amount of room here as Disneyland… so why could he not go there?
I would prefer him inside the actual attic. I don’t really love the placement at Disneyland much.
Busy with "litter theming" that only serves to spoon-feed backstory so Constance Hathaway works. Strip that all back to its more eerie original version and Hatbox would have a proper place again.The attic is too intimate and busy already imo. I like that he’s a moment just outside the attic.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$Perhaps the space inside of where this roof was located contains something that caused issues, something that wasn't a problem at DL.
I will take the new bride if it means moving HBG into a better place but I am not really a fan of the new DL Attic and it's story (or lack thereof.)At least they're aware of the controversy. The hope now is that with enough complaints and the prospects of a new bride for Orlando all is not lost for their Attic reunion. Unlikely, but it's not zero.
I wish they’d left him out of the WDW version entirely. I’ve never understood the appeal, and the controversy that’s been generated by his placement just isn’t worth it.
Same. He’s pretty cool. Inasmuch as he’s distracting, your glance is drawn away from a floating candelabra. That gag is already featured at the start of the ride.I’m personally not bothered at all by the WDW placement. You see him, he does his thing, and you move on.
Same. He’s pretty cool. Inasmuch as he’s distracting, your glance is drawn away from a floating candelabra. That gag is already featured at the start of the ride.
I find him too cartoony and modern. I know he’s based on original designs, but he just doesn’t harmonise with the other figures.I think the way he currently exists in the WDW version detracts from the ride rather than enhancing it.
I'm of the opinion that they just shouldn't have done it at all. (If they couldn't do it right) Would rather he not exist in MK's Mansion. There's also no reason (other than $) why they couldn't have made a lighter weight and smaller footprint version.HMF tipped me off that the HBG discussion was waking up again over here and suggested I stop by. So yeah, pretty much everything I wanted to say about the WDW HBG I've said at the Long-Forgotten blog, but the main issue that forced the placement where he is, is money. The thing is HEAVY and needs a sturdy place big enough for both the figure and a place behind him where they can scoot him in for repairs. At DL they beefed up the flooring, etc., on the attic porch and the gable behind him, which they could have done at WDW also, but the budget wouldn't allow for both the figure itself AND the substructure work, so the EH tableau was the only feasible alternative. Apparently the floor there was either sturdy enough or was more easily strengthened. The Imagineers weren't happy about the placement and went out of their way to give a "read" to the ghost that could be shoehorned into the 3-act play that is the HM. Muddy footprints pointing to and away from the door, lots of baggage, etc. = He's not part of the retirement community but a recent interloper (or party crasher, if you will) just now moving in, and therefore he avoided the curse or the cosmic sticky wicket, or whatever it is that has all the others stuck and in need of Leota's help.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.