• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

News The Walt Disney Company Board of Directors Extends Robert A. Iger’s Contract as CEO Through 2026

rio

Well-Known Member
I think what is attributable to Napster and the file sharing networks is that they forced the equation to change fundamentally.

Bands toured to support the record in the hopes it would lead to more record sales. Now bands put out some type of music or bill themselves as a legacy act so that they can go on tour.

I remember tickets costing $12. Now $1200.
Your conflating two different things. If artists could've gotten away with charging $1200 30 years ago they would've done so.
 

LSLS

Well-Known Member
I think what is attributable to Napster and the file sharing networks is that they forced the equation to change fundamentally.

Bands toured to support the record in the hopes it would lead to more record sales. Now bands put out some type of music or bill themselves as a legacy act so that they can go on tour.

I remember tickets costing $12. Now $1200.
Bands didn't really make much off album sales, they have always relied on touring/merch to make their money. Sure, someone like Metallica selling 40 million made money, but the vast majority made all their money touring. In fact, even Metallica made a lot less than you'd expect up until like 1995 when they sued and settled with Elektra. Honestly, I haven't been around the industry in decades so I can't tell you why ticket prices have hit the levels they have, but the bands relying on tours isn't a new phenom based on the decline of physical media.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
No, trust me, Comcast isn’t free! We get Netflix & Peacock included with our cable TV & HS internet service…
Your cable fee paid for your WWE programming. It isn't free. Your service pays for WWE content out of the monthly subscriber fee. Companies love to make it sound like your getting something free, but it's all bundled into your monthly bill.

Since you're paying your service for WWE programming and they aren't showing it any more, you should ask for a rebate.
 

Smiley/OCD

Well-Known Member
Your cable fee paid for your WWE programming. It isn't free. Your service pays for WWE content out of the monthly subscriber fee. Companies love to make it sound like your getting something free, but it's all bundled into your monthly bill.

Since you're paying your service for WWE programming and they aren't showing it any more, you should ask for a rebate.
First off, it’s not MY WWE, I just used it as an example…of course it’s all bundled into our monthly statement. I just opined that we received Netflix & Peacock included as a “perk” of keeping the cable & internet service. My original post had to do with the addition of WWE to ESPN+…whether it would have an impact ( positive or negative) on their subscribers…as a longtime Disney World attendee, I know FULL WELL that you don’t get “somethin’ for nothin’”
 
Last edited:

Smoky

Active Member

It’s cute everyone thinks Bob is actually leavin
I feel like there's two likely outcomes here:

A. Bob makes another Chapek tier hire out of personal spite for people liking Josh and expecting him to get the job
B. Bob doesn't actually retire and clings to power for years to come

I'm starting to think that there's absolutely no way this gets resolved in an orderly way that benefits the company OR the consumers.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member

"D’Amaro’s increasingly public profile has left insiders with the distinct impression that he is the favorite.."

Oh.. ""insiders"" have an ""impression."" Must be true!!!



It’s cute everyone thinks Bob is actually leaving.
He left once before. It has happened. Thinking it can't happen is denying history.
 

eddie104

Well-Known Member

monothingie

The Most Positive Member on the Forum ™
Premium Member
"D’Amaro’s increasingly public profile has left insiders with the distinct impression that he is the favorite.."

Oh.. ""insiders"" have an ""impression."" Must be true!!!




He left once before. It has happened. Thinking it can't happen is denying history.
He never left. He was still employed as a special consultant per the terms of his contract. Most of the C-Suite ran almost everything through him even when he stepped aside as chairman. He never gave up his office.

You're dealing with a person who named a building after himself...there is no actual separation from the company at this point. If he could get away with it, he'd rename TWDC, The Bob Iger Company.
 

Dranth

Well-Known Member
He never left. He was still employed as a special consultant per the terms of his contract. Most of the C-Suite ran almost everything through him even when he stepped aside as chairman. He never gave up his office.

You're dealing with a person who named a building after himself...there is no actual separation from the company at this point. If he could get away with it, he'd rename TWDC, The Bob Iger Company.
I don't even disagree with much of the complaints about Iger, but he did leave. He left the company completely when he stepped down from the board. No office, no subordinates, no decision making, nothing.

Iger is still retired and sitting at home today if Chapek wasn't an incompetent clown.
 

monothingie

The Most Positive Member on the Forum ™
Premium Member
I don't even disagree with much of the complaints about Iger, but he did leave. He left the company completely when he stepped down from the board. No office, no subordinates, no decision making, nothing.
Wrong.

His employment contract made him a consultant to the company for a period of 5 years after his official separation. Bob I. never gave up his office with the shower in it to Bob C.
Iger is still retired and sitting at home today if Chapek wasn't an incompetent clown.
Chapek was not a dummy, saying that is just a lazy argument. We can disagree with his approach and ideas, but he worked hard to get to where he was. His biggest fault was he refused to just be a figure head for Bob I, and got kneecapped as a result.
 

Dranth

Well-Known Member
His employment contract made him a consultant to the company for a period of 5 years after his official separation. Bob I. never gave up his office with the shower in it to Bob C.
Which he was never called in for after he stepped down from the board. He was gone.

Chapek was not a dummy, saying that is just a lazy argument. We can disagree with his approach and ideas, but he worked hard to get to where he was. His biggest fault was he refused to just be a figure head for Bob I, and got kneecapped as a result.
I didn't say he was dumb, I said he was incompetent and a clown.

Chapek got that position because Iger kept firing all the competent people who could replace him. In no way was he selected because he was an amazing candidate, he was the only one and that is 100% on Iger. Maybe he would be a great CEO at certain companies, but the man was an accountant that displayed little empathy and personality, which makes him a terrible choice for CEO at a company like Disney.

In just two years Chapek managed to p-off most of his work force, drive Imagineering into the ground, purposely lie to and go against the board which directly lead to a fight with the state of Florida and the loss of RCID, p-off Wall Street, put a hospital architect in charge of Imagineering, put an accountant in charge of the studios, oversaw the stock getting more than cut in half and that is all without even getting into what he did at the parks.

Bottom line, if Chapek didn't make a series of comically bad mistakes, he would still be CEO right now.
 

monothingie

The Most Positive Member on the Forum ™
Premium Member
Which he was never called in for after he stepped down from the board. He was gone.


I didn't say he was dumb, I said he was incompetent and a clown.

Chapek got that position because Iger kept firing all the competent people who could replace him. In no way was he selected because he was an amazing candidate, he was the only one and that is 100% on Iger. Maybe he would be a great CEO at certain companies, but the man was an accountant that displayed little empathy and personality, which makes him a terrible choice for CEO at a company like Disney.

In just two years Chapek managed to p-off most of his work force, drive Imagineering into the ground, purposely lie to and go against the board which directly lead to a fight with the state of Florida and the loss of RCID, p-off Wall Street, put a hospital architect in charge of Imagineering, put an accountant in charge of the studios, oversaw the stock getting more than cut in half and that is all without even getting into what he did at the parks.

Bottom line, if Chapek didn't make a series of comically bad mistakes, he would still be CEO right now.

VnQ2CNW.gif
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Which he was never called in for after he stepped down from the board. He was gone.


I didn't say he was dumb, I said he was incompetent and a clown.

Chapek got that position because Iger kept firing all the competent people who could replace him. In no way was he selected because he was an amazing candidate, he was the only one and that is 100% on Iger. Maybe he would be a great CEO at certain companies, but the man was an accountant that displayed little empathy and personality, which makes him a terrible choice for CEO at a company like Disney.

In just two years Chapek managed to p-off most of his work force, drive Imagineering into the ground, purposely lie to and go against the board which directly lead to a fight with the state of Florida and the loss of RCID, p-off Wall Street, put a hospital architect in charge of Imagineering, put an accountant in charge of the studios, oversaw the stock getting more than cut in half and that is all without even getting into what he did at the parks.

Bottom line, if Chapek didn't make a series of comically bad mistakes, he would still be CEO right now.

I don’t think it’s really hard to reconstruct how chapek “got the job”
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom