MK Cars-Themed Attractions at Magic Kingdom

Incomudro

Well-Known Member
This has nothing to do with being jammed with rides. That wasn’t the point.

Even in 1971 they would have removed attractions if they weren’t popular enough to justify keeping them.

The point you were replying to was that Disney world exists to make money. Always has and always will. How has and will continue to evolve.
Disney back in the day recognized that maximization all there was to the parks.
That's why when you entered Disney Land or World, you got an experience outside any you had ever had before.
There were exciting things, and there were calm and relaxing aesthetics as well.
 

peter11435

Well-Known Member
Disney back in the day recognized that maximization all there was to the parks.
That's why when you entered Disney Land or World, you got an experience outside any you had ever had before.
There were exciting things, and there were calm and relaxing aesthetics as well.
And you still do and there still are…
 

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
Outside of boards like these the vast majority of people I know are very excited about this change.
I mean…. You seem pretty enthusiastic about the change so they may be feeding off of that. Many of my friends in the steam train and antique vehicle community (of all ages) are sad.

But that of course misses the point…. Ideally Disney parks have something for everyone. Ragtime piano and steam trains for me…. And Winnie the Pooh and princesses for others!
 

TheMaxRebo

Well-Known Member
I mean…. You seem pretty enthusiastic about the change so they may be feeding off of that. Many of my friends in the steam train and antique vehicle community (of all ages) are sad.

But that of course misses the point…. Ideally Disney parks have something for everyone. Ragtime piano and steam trains for me…. And Winnie the Pooh and princesses for others!

Well, as I said before, enthusiastic is too strong ... But maybe - though often just share without knowing my thoughts or when I just tell them what is happening they say "oh, so nothing of consequence lost"

Personally I think they are underselling it

But I do think for a majority of guests this change will be a net positive
 

Brer Panther

Well-Known Member
At this point, I would just replace Stich with... Stitch? and make it a better show. First off, scrap the chilli dogs, if you need a smell make it bubblegum as a funny nod to how people said they don't sell gum in the parks for a reason.
Honestly, if they're gonna close the Laugh Floor what with Monstropolis being added to Hollywood Studios, maybe they could put a clone of the "Living Character" Stitch show they have in Tokyo, Paris and Hong Kong in that theater.

As for the Stitch's Great Escape space... I have no idea. Elio's underperforming so I doubt it's gonna be THAT.
The Coco ride seemed cool.
Wasn't it gonna be another Soarin'?
 

Centauri Space Station

Well-Known Member
This has nothing to do with being jammed with rides. That wasn’t the point.

Even in 1971 they would have removed attractions if they weren’t popular enough to justify keeping them.

The point you were replying to was that Disney world exists to make money. Always has and always will. How has and will continue to evolve.
They did remove the Swan boats after operating for just 8 years.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom