MK Cars-Themed Attractions at Magic Kingdom

[TheMaxRebo]

I’ve never suggested that guests won’t like piston peak - if it’s well done (or even mediocre like 7 dwarves) guests will indeed enjoy it.

Guests would also like a rollercoaster to replace the jungle cruise and treehouse I’m sure.

At some point…. It ceases to be Walt Disneys Magic Kingdom. Not sure where that point is.

I think it will take a lot - and Piston Peak will potentially add to it not take away from it

Having visited a lot of other theme/amusement parks there is a ton separating Disney and the the rivers of America is not the only thing and if done right the end result could into distance itself from other options

It will be different but that doesn't mean worse and can mean better

 

[Animaniac93-98]

No, but it’s another in a list of questionable results, especially in the category of “they know this is important and really have to deliver.”

We've seen a lot of that in recent years, even for things that should have been straightforward and routine

(like the 2020 repaint of the castle)

 

[TrainsOfDisney]

Having visited a lot of other theme/amusement parks there is a ton separating Disney and the the rivers of America is not the only thing and if done right the end result could into distance itself from other options

This may come as a shock but many of us visit lots of other theme/ amusement parks.

Everything I’ve seen about Piston Peak reminds me of something Herschend would build. Which is fun - Herschend does great things. But it shrinks the gap for me that’s for sure.

 

[Chi84]

The argument is largely that the Rivers of America are vital to the thematic integrity, peace, tranquility and storytelling of an entire quadrant of the park. Even if you did not actually step foot on its attractions, you are interacting with its effect the entire time you waltz through Frontierland.

There may have been mild tolerance for adaptation or modification, but not removal. A physical barrier wall, no matter how potentially pretty it could be, is not an equivocal exchange.

Tantmount to London filling in the Thames or Paris the Seine. It’s not merely a matter of a disruptive modern building, it simply is no longer the same place.

It will be different.

 

[BrianLo]

It will be different.

Indeed. I have a very permissive line in the sand. But if this Cars attraction was being plopped in the DAK water amphitheater instead I might be willing to punch a throat or two.

(Dear Universe, I’m not suggesting that)

 

[JackCH]

Indeed. I have a very permissive line in the sand. But if this Cars attraction was being plopped in the DAK water amphitheater instead I might be willing to punch a throat or two.

(Dear Universe, I’m not suggesting that)

Personally I think this would be great in Showcase lagoon! As long as they landscape it so I don’t see Car elements from Germany or Japan

 

[phillip9698]

This may come as a shock but many of us visit lots of other theme/ amusement parks.

Everything I’ve seen about Piston Peak reminds me of something Herschend would build. Which is fun - Herschend does great things. But it shrinks the gap for me that’s for sure.

There is absolutely nothing at Dollywood, Silver Dollar City, or any of the other parks owned by Herschend that would approach Piston Peak if Disney does even their average standard rock work in the area.

Herschend wouldn’t even build a ride like this to begin with. They would just build another exposed steel coaster and call it a day.

Your comment couldn’t possibly be more disingenuous.

 

[TrainsOfDisney]

There is absolutely nothing at Dollywood, Silver Dollar City, or any of the other parks owned by Herschend that would approach Piston Peak if Disney does even their average standard rock work in the area.

Your comment couldn’t possibly be more disingenuous.

*with prettier rock work

There I fixed it, haha

 

[ChrisFL]

Saying Rivers of America and Tom Sawyer Island aren't worth much as most people only look at it and don't visit anything inside....................Cinderella Castle most people only look at too, and it would be revered even if it didn't have a restaurant inside and....do they still have the boutique thing?

Anyway my point is not everything has to be an attraction to add a great amount to the experience.

 

[TrainsOfDisney]

There is absolutely nothing at Dollywood, Silver Dollar City, or any of the other parks owned by Herschend that would approach Piston Peak if Disney does even their average standard rock work in the area.

so rather than mud slinging like the ATV’s are gonna do let’s discuss….

Family coasters.
I think firechaser at Dollywood is a better attraction than slinky dog.

Is 7 dwarves better than Bear Mountain because of the prettier rock work? What are your thoughts?

 

[James Alucobond]

Is 7 dwarves better than Bear Mountain because of the prettier rock work? What are your thoughts?

Better themed attraction, certainly. Better ride? Depends what you like.

 

[Architectural Guinea Pig]

At some point…. It ceases to be Walt Disneys Magic Kingdom. Not sure where that point is.

And yet, since when has it been Walt Disney's Magic Kingdom?

In my mind, Disneyland has always been Walt Disney's Magic Kingdom, and MK itself is America's Magic Kingdom. They each fulfill their own purpose, one is bound by history with its direct connections to Walt, and the other is bound by the ever-evolving ideals and imaginations of America.

Magic Kingdom is just as sacred as Disneyland in its own way. The point of MK is not to keep everything the same as it is, it's to grow and to change just like America, and change is what makes MK sacred.

 

[Brer Panther]

No, but it’s another in a list of questionable results, especially in the category of “they know this is important and really have to deliver.”

I recall everyone was saying the same thing about Tiana's Bayou Adventure, and look at how THAT turned out.

 

[Incomudro]

And yet, since when has it been Walt Disney's Magic Kingdom?

In my mind, Disneyland has always been Walt Disney's Magic Kingdom, and MK itself is America's Magic Kingdom. They each fulfill their own purpose, one is bound by history with its direct connections to Walt, and the other is bound by the ever-evolving ideals and imaginations of America.

Magic Kingdom is just as sacred as Disneyland in its own way. The point of MK is not to keep everything the same as it is, it's to grow and to change just like America, and change is what makes MK sacred.

That's the point?

 

[solidyne]

I recall everyone was saying the same thing about Tiana's Bayou Adventure, and look at how THAT turned out.

Yes, it's a common refrain, sung with tones of forgiveness and short-term memory loss. I first took note of it in the lead-up to Galaxy's Edge.

 

[EricsBiscuit]

And yet, since when has it been Walt Disney's Magic Kingdom?

In my mind, Disneyland has always been Walt Disney's Magic Kingdom, and MK itself is America's Magic Kingdom. They each fulfill their own purpose, one is bound by history with its direct connections to Walt, and the other is bound by the ever-evolving ideals and imaginations of America.

Magic Kingdom is just as sacred as Disneyland in its own way. The point of MK is not to keep everything the same as it is, it's to grow and to change just like America, and change is what makes MK sacred.

Change does not make anything “sacred.” What makes MK important is quality. Change for the sake of change is pointless. Change is only an improvement if what comes after is better than what was there before. As others have mentioned, once you change something enough, it is no longer the same.

 

[EricsBiscuit]

Calvin Coolidge once said "It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones." The same applies to the replacement of classic theme park attractions.

 

[𝐌𝖆𝖓 𝖎𝖓 𝐖𝖊𝖇]

Change for the sake of change is pointless.

This isn't That.

 

[EricsBiscuit]

This isn't That.

The post I was quoting said change makes the park “sacred.” Change in and of itself is not a good thing.

 

[𝐌𝖆𝖓 𝖎𝖓 𝐖𝖊𝖇]

The post I was quoting said change makes the park “sacred.” Change in and of itself is not a good thing.

Change in and of itself is change. Neither good nor bad. But I see your point.