On Mt. Everest, *we* are the Indy!!!Indy while a human, can have a heavy focus on a mythological creature ala Everest. In this case, Quetzalcōātl.
On Mt. Everest, *we* are the Indy!!!Indy while a human, can have a heavy focus on a mythological creature ala Everest. In this case, Quetzalcōātl.
Dinosaur is supposed to be go-away green because the box is intended to merge with the foliage if you happen to glimpse it from certain locations. It’s not canonically part of the Dino Institute. Theater in the Wild is painted a color that continues the greens from the facade because the entire structure is an on-stage theater. There’s nothing to hide.I know it's not the point of the post... but I'm surprised Nemo and Dinosaur use different shades of green... Dinosaur is what I would usually associate Goawaygreen with.
Dr Seeker is the indy on dinosaurOn Mt. Everest, *we* are the Indy!!!
On Mt. Everest, *we* are the Indy!!!
I know this is a joke, but this is actually one of my main aspects DAK IJA has to get right.
Animal Kingdom stories are about YOU going on an adventure. You are the main character. You play an active and foundational role in the plot. If DAK IJA is about Indiana Jones going on an adventure, and Indiana Jones is the main character of the ride, then it won't fit Animal Kingdom. Regardles of whether they plop an animal onto it.
The ride needs to play a lot closer to Everest than DL IJA. Its framing, perspective, and structure need to conform to DAK's narrative conventions, rather than Indy's.
Is that a written rule somewhere?
That's gonna make the Encanto attraction pretty hard to make fit in Animal Kingdom too, then, won't it? If the Madrigals are the main characters of the ride and we're just going through the scenes watching them a la Under the Sea, I mean.Animal Kingdom stories are about YOU going on an adventure. You are the main character. You play an active and foundational role in the plot. If DAK IJA is about Indiana Jones going on an adventure, and Indiana Jones is the main character of the ride, then it won't fit Animal Kingdom. Regardles of whether they plop an animal onto it.
We know this is not the format. It’s not a sequence of scenes from the film. It’s one scene from the film (the one with animals) teased apart into a longer scenario.That's gonna make the Encanto attraction pretty hard to make fit in Animal Kingdom too, then, won't it? If the Madrigals are the main characters of the ride and we're just going through the scenes watching them a la Under the Sea, I mean.
It is whatever Joe Rohde says it is but sadly he retired so now it is whatever the Marketing people say it is.Yes, but it also doesn't have to be. Themes aren't something that need to be spelled out to us by an author. They're underlying ideas that exist in art, which we can observe for ourselves.
Joe is still involved but not in a major capacity.It is whatever Joe Rohde says it is but sadly he retired so now it is whatever the Marketing people say it is.
Joe returned to the company. How much control he has over "his park" at this point is a valid question, but I would expect him to be involved in this Tropical Americas build.It is whatever Joe Rohde says it is but sadly he retired so now it is whatever the Marketing people say it is.
That's gonna make the Encanto attraction pretty hard to make fit in Animal Kingdom too, then, won't it? If the Madrigals are the main characters of the ride and we're just going through the scenes watching them a la Under the Sea, I mean.
It is whatever Joe Rohde says it is but sadly he retired so now it is whatever the Marketing people say it is.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Josh D'Amaro say something along the lines of that the ride takes place the day Antonio getting his gift and we would eventually end up in Antonio's room along with the Madrigals, which to me seems like the story of the Encanto attraction is going to expand upon that day in some way and not be a book report of the film.I'm still not convinced that the Encanto ride isn't just going to be a book report of the film. It takes place on the day Antonio got his gift... just like the whole film.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Josh D'Amaro say something along the lines of that the ride takes place the day Antonio getting his gift and we would eventually end up in Antonio's room along with the Madrigals, which to me seems like the story of the Encanto attraction is going to expand upon that day in some way and not be a book report of the film.
That doesn't necessarily mean the ride will focus on Antonio and his animal friends. It'll probably just be a generic tour of the house, seeing all the other Madrigals do their stuff, probably with a performance of "We Don't Talk About Bruno" thrown in for no reason, before we get to Antonio's room and then the ride ends.Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Josh D'Amaro say something along the lines of that the ride takes place the day Antonio getting his gift and we would eventually end up in Antonio's room along with the Madrigals, which to me seems like the story of the Encanto attraction is going to expand upon that day in some way and not be a book report of the film.
The day Antonio gets his gift is only the first act of the movieI'm still not convinced that the Encanto ride isn't just going to be a book report of the film. It takes place on the day Antonio got his gift... just like the whole film.
We have no way of knowing if they will focus on Antonio and the animals in a manner that is thematically cohesive with Animal Kingdom, but there is literally no reason for them to carve out the slice of the film they have said they’re extracting if they’re not at least trying to do so. Concern is not unwarranted, but your continued insistence that it will be something they’ve already said it’s not is kind of silly.That doesn't necessarily mean the ride will focus on Antonio and his animal friends.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.