News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District

[MisterPenguin]

Well... this is new...

PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENT​

Part A: Policies​

​

INTRODUCTION​

​

In accordance with the legislative intent expressed in Florida Statutes §§163.3161(10) and 187.101(3) that​

governmental entities respect judicially acknowledged and constitutionally protected private property rights;​

each local government shall include in its comprehensive plan a property rights element to ensure that​

private property rights are considered in local decision making. This element fulfills that requirement. It is​

divided into two major sections. The “Policies” component, Part A, contains goals, objectives, and policies.​

The “Supporting Data and Analysis”, Part B, provides background on the element.​

​

GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES​

​

GOAL​

The Central Florida Tourism Oversight District will respect judicially acknowledged and​

constitutionally protected private property rights.​

​

Objective 1​

In accordance with Florida Statues §163.3177(6)(i), the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District shall​

consider the following rights in local decision making:​

​

Policy 1.1: The right of a property owner to physically possess and control his or her interests in the​

property, including easements, leases, or mineral rights.​

​

Policy 1.2: The right of a property owner to use, maintain, develop, and improve his or her property​

for personal use or for the use of any other person, subject to state law and local​

ordinances.​

​

Policy 1.3: The right of the property owner to privacy and to exclude others from the property to protect​

the owner’s possessions and property.​

​

Policy 1.4: The right of a property owner to dispose of his or her property through sale or gift​

 

[MisterPenguin]

Just FYI: The minor parks are the two water parks and ESPN Zone.

 

[MisterPenguin]

I like how all the stats of the number of guests are taken from AECOM and not from WDW itself, which could, if they wanted to, provide more exact and more recent figures.

LOL

 

[MisterPenguin]

 

[MisterPenguin]

The new Comprehensive Plan has been published by CFTOD! Some notable changes!

https://www.oversightdistrict.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/6-27-2025-BOS-Packet-FINAL.pdf

View attachment 866460

Going thru the maps and explanations, the short story is that outside the dark green, everything else is buildable... with varying degrees of difficulty.

Also, the Comprehensive Place leans heavily in stating that they're running out of room to 'sprawl.' So, look forward to higher density builds (e.g., new hotel towers v. spread out buildings).

NE of RoA, all that land up to the railroad tracks, and beyond to the canals, is buildable. IOW, the current lay down yards *could* be part of Villains Land, or, some future expansion.

 

[wdwmagic]

Walt Disney World's Future Could Still Include a Fifth Park, New Planning Document Reveals​

Walt Disney World's Future Could Include a Fifth Park, New Planning Document Reveals

Walt Disney World's Future Could Include a Fifth Park, New Planning Document Reveals

www.wdwmagic.com

 

[osian]

Well I wish they'd hurry up and get started. I'll be over 80 by 2045.

 

[John park hopper]

I'll believe I when I see it

 

[bmr1591]

I wonder if they’d use untapped land or if they’d tear down Wide World of Sports, where some infrastructure is already in place. I’m also curious what theme they’d strive toward that would inevitably become an IP hodge podge. Or maybe that would be the theme.

 

[DisneyRoy]

Minor in size or minor in amusements? They could do two boutique and one mega park with that description.
But I read this forum and know TDO can never build another park in WDW so all the speculation is just bytes in the wind

Can't? Or won't?

 

[rle4lunch]

20 years for a 5 year project. Good luck WDO.

 

[monothingie]

Bob Igerland confirmed!

It will be a glorious 500 acre theme park dedicated to all Disney CEOS but really only Bob Iger.

 

[Bocabear]

I can only imagine the extremely expensive, attraction-light, shopping-heavy value engineered park they will develop in 2035...It will be like a new Disney Springs with an outrageous entry fee, a carousel and small rollercoaster and 25 meet and greets.

 

[TheMaxRebo]

View attachment 866473

View attachment 866475

View attachment 866476

I don't think I want to visit a Magic Kingdom with the average attendance of 76,942 people

 

[Figments Friend]

Instead of building a new park, they should take a real look at the properties they already have and invest in improving and expanding those.

-

 

[JohnD]

If they're anticipating a fifth gate, can they rethink Cars Land and put it somewhere else while retaining ROA? "If you can dream it, you can do it."

 

[JohnD]

Instead of building a new park, they should take a real look at the properties they already have and invest in improving and expanding those.

-

They are. If you define "improving and expanding" as bulldozing ROA and installing Piston Peak instead. Not against Villains Land as that would be on the opposite side of the RR tracks.

 

[Rhinocerous]

If they're anticipating a fifth gate, can they rethink Cars Land and put it somewhere else while retaining ROA? "If you can dream it, you can do it."

I can't dream it. It has been beaten out of me.

 

[danlb_2000]

Keep in mind that the allowance for a 5th gate has been in the comprehensive plan since at least 2010. Inclusion in the plan means the plan "supports construction of that gate", NOT "we plan to build that gate"

 

[Rhinocerous]

This is ultimately a meaningless distinction, but is the plan based on 'what the property can support' or 'the direction we want to develop towards'?