Perhaps that should be the new inscription over the main portal into the park?This new park can't be everything to everyone. That is just not how life works.
Yeah I mean good point, what do people expect? To not pay $100 to slow roast like a raisin over a slow ride with mostly just seeing what you can already seen in the land? People are just unreasonable!Some people have unrealistic expectations. This new park can't be everything to everyone. That is just not how life works.
To all who enter this park, please note that we do cannot cater to everyone. We cater to only the EPIC people. People who like FAST rollercoasters and being internally cooked to a crisp 425 internal. If you don't like that, then SCRAM. (we can't handle more than 15k people a day anyway)Perhaps that should be the new inscription over the main portal into the park?
Best thing they could do is fast track a couple indoor C-tickets to open ASAP.
It is Epic Universe, not toddler world. This isn't the MK and they aren't Disney. Nor should they try to be. If someone wants chill, family dark ride experiences, this isn't the park for them.
It is Epic Universe, not toddler world. This isn't the MK and they aren't Disney. Nor should they try to be. If someone wants chill, family dark ride experiences, this isn't the park for them.
Google reviews have a 4.2 rating for Epic,
It's for younger Millenials and Gen Z definitely.It’s an interesting question — who is Epic for? It’s not really for the kids (outside of the Mario kids), nor is it for the top thrill-seekers in the way Islands kinda is. It’s not for anyone like my mom who likes the calmer rides and doesn’t want to be violently shaken on Monsters or Ministry.
Is it just for the theme park heads, like us? It’s kinda seeming like it.
There are many strong elements to Epic, but this is not a family park.Universal is absolutely trying to cater to families...
It's not a family park yet Universal advertised 2/4 of the lands with children as the main actors showing them off?There are many strong elements to Epic, but this is not a family park.
If you think it is, put together a day of activities that a family with kids aged 4, 7, and 10 can do together for an eight hour visit that would justify the $750 admission fee.
I’d think it differs from land to land and is each portal is mostly geared towards fans of the IPs they’re based on. Now there are age demographics too. Please note that none of the following is intended to be offensive or genalizing. These are guesses about how universal sees it. Super Nintendo world is geared toward kids teenagersand adults who are nostalgic for the brand. Harry Potter is geared towards millennials and to a lesser extent whole families. How to train your dragon apparently has a decent sized gen z fan base but more realistically it’s supposed to be the parks Toy Story land with its ride lineup. Dark universe is the tricky one. I would imagine it’s mostly geared towards goths and younger monsters fans. I imagine that it’s going to be the most popular with passholders because it’s almost an original ip land which passholders tend to like.It’s an interesting question — who is Epic for? It’s not really for the kids (outside of the Mario kids), nor is it for the top thrill-seekers in the way Islands kinda is. It’s not for anyone like my mom who likes the calmer rides and doesn’t want to be violently shaken on Monsters or Ministry.
Is it just for the theme park heads, like us? It’s kinda seeming like it.
A family with young children could easily spend all day in SNW and Berk alone. It is most definitely a family oriented park, just like every other park in Orlando.There are many strong elements to Epic, but this is not a family park.
If you think it is, put together a day of activities that a family with kids aged 4, 7, and 10 can do together for an eight hour visit that would justify the $750 admission fee.
It technically is a family park. Other than Monsters, Stardust Racers and Dragon Racers Rally, every attraction is 40" and above.There are many strong elements to Epic, but this is not a family park.
If you think it is, put together a day of activities that a family with kids aged 4, 7, and 10 can do together for an eight hour visit that would justify the $750 admission fee.
There is something to consider, the other major Orlando Parks have around for a long time, and Epic Universe had its grand opening last month. Also Google Reviews didn't get its start before 2007.Google reviews have a 4.2 rating for Epic, the lowest for any of the major Orlando parks. By comparison the other two Universal parks have a 4.7. SeaWorld has a 4.4. The lowest WDW park is Hollywood Studios with 4.6.
The general public doesn’t think in terms of “wow today Epic sucked but so would my day at MGM if I’d been there in 1989.”There is something to consider, the other major Orlando Parks have around for a long time, and Epic Universe had its grand opening last month. Also Google Reviews didn't get its start before 2007.
What I'm getting at rest of the theme parks were first open before Google reviews existed. I'm pretty sure if Google Reviews existed in 1989, Disney MGM Studios would've got low ratings in its first month after Grand opening.
The fact is when DHS was called Disney MGM Studios back in 1989, the park only had Studio Backlot Tour, Indiana Stunt Spectacular, Superstar Television, The Monster Sound show, and the great movie ride during the park's grand opening. I know Backlot Tour was much longer in 1989, but doesn't excuse the amount of attraction DHS started out for May of 1989 grand opening.
Don't mention Star Tours to me because that attraction didn't open till December of 1989. The fact is Epic Universe had more attractions during its grand opening than DHS did for its grand opening in May of 1989.
If were basing these "reactions" off Google reviews I wouldn't say a 4.2/5 is very split, that means the reviews are mostly positive.The general public doesn’t think in terms of “wow today Epic sucked but so would my day at MGM if I’d been there in 1989.”
Opening a new park and getting very split reactions like this is not good brand management in 2025.
Plenty of the rave reviews are from people who went during previews and the first few days. More recent reviews seem to have a lot of 1-2 stars. Have to say the wordy canned Universal responses to those (sorry to hear, state-of-the-art technology, contact us at etc) have gotten to be laughable.If were basing these "reactions" off Google reviews I wouldn't say a 4.2/5 is very split, that means the reviews are mostly positive.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.