mickEblu
Well-Known Member
I think some people put too much stock in catering to a very small age group. Most kids reach 4 feet at like 6 to 8 years old. They so quickly go from toddlers who nap in a stroller and meet characters to kids who wish they were tall enough for the more thrilling rides. Disney is in almost zero danger of losing families with very young kids, but they’re in increasing competition for slightly older kids and beyond, so it makes sense to mostly add thrilling-ish rides especially because they’re easier to advertise anyway.
There’s already a solid amount for little kids between Little Mermaid, Toy Story Mania, Web Slingers, the Ferris wheel, 2 Cars rides, and 6 other pier rides.
Not a bad point but when you're in it and you're the one that has one or more kids under 48 or 40 inches its rough not really not worth buying annual passes for that kind of park. Now at DCA that doesn't matter as much because you have Disneyland across the way but at USH for example it's a huge issue as you practically have nothing to do there other than the Tram Tour (which you can only really do once in a while), SLOP and the Kung Fu Panda show. The bigger issue at DCA for me is not that there isn't enough for kids to do per se. It's that there isn't enough for kids under 40 inches to do that appeal to me too.