MK Cars-Themed Attractions at Magic Kingdom

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
I am impressed the effort you put in to disparage me! Well done!.... also feels kind of creepy to me... ;)
It's super easy, barely an inconvenience. Search and multi-quote features of the forum software.

Just like we have a "like" button to indicate we agree with a post rather than everyone flood the threads with new posts that basically just say "ditto."
 

Incomudro

Well-Known Member
You don’t seem to be following the conversation

It's what they are choosing to do with it. Cars setting is "Contemporary" in an area that is not. If Disney had chosen to refresh with Brother Bear, actual Ranger Woodlore, Humphrey and the bears from the In the Bag animated short, Camp Woodchuck Donald & his nephews from Tokyo Disneyland, and / or to launch a brand new Frontier / Wilderness franchise "coming soon to a theater near you" or just for the Magic Kingdom, in a timeless setting, people would be feeling a whole lot better about a Frontierland refresh project.
In Disney's defense from a guy who hasn't been defending them: I don't believe this will really be a cars setting unless you are inside the land.
I hope I'm correct about that.
For me, I don't have an issue with that, as long as I'm not seeing the cars from the Frontierland side of the water - and hopefully not from the Haunted Mansion's perspective.
If I only see the cars from inside the land, I have no more issue with that than I do with singing bears and trumpet playing alligators.
Yes, I realize the time frame is completely different but I'm ok with that if it isn't a visual clash from the outside.
 

DisDude33

Well-Known Member
They've had almost a year to let it leak, to reassure people, that the water along the central corridor would remain. Why didn't anyone say something? People misreading concept art would have been an easy thing to remedy rather than let people simmer in angst unnecessarily.
But then they wouldn’t get to watch people simmer in angst unnecessarily and that just so happens to be a lot of top executives favorite hobby.
 

No Ticket!

New Member
They’re not which confirms that this particular version of the land is stepping away from being locked the wild west style that Frontierland has been stuck in for years.

Back when Disneyland and Magic Kingdom were built, the idea of a land based around the aesthetics and vibes of the wild western frontier and the time of cowboys and natives, that ideas was a novel one. It tapped in to an interest that many in the country had. In today’s world, though that idea is not novel.

Not only can you step into a frontier style land in multiple Disney parks, you can step into one in literally dozens and dozens of other amusement and theme parks around the country and even around the world. Today you even have some parks that are built completely around that idea.

Disneyland, and by extension Magic Kingdom, had its lands and attractions based around a lot of Walt Disney’s interests and ideations. A lot of those passions and interests of his have stood the test of time. His his love and interpretation of America’s frontier just hasn’t. When you’re running the busiest theme park in the world you can’t hang onto something solely because of what Walt was interested in.

You have a duty to respond to guests’ changing desires and attitudes. You have to take into account the unprecedented access that guest traveling to Magic Kingdom these days have to other experiences, and that includes other experiences, park lands, and attractions just like current Frontierland.

I understand people may not be comfortable with this change. But the wonderful news is that the Disney parks have grown much further beyond the boundaries at Disneyland and Magic Kingdom. There are traditional Frontierlands in Anaheim, Tokyo, and Paris for people to still enjoy. But with there now being so many parks around the world, Disney’s job—dare I say responsibility even—is to diversify them and create unique offerings for them.

I am not sold on every part of this project. While I have been in support of doing something else with the land that the Rivers of America sits on for years before this announcement, I have not necessarily been in support of that thing being Cars. While this breakdown of information does help to settle that idea with me more, I still think their execution is what matters the most, and there’s a lot of room from mistakes in that. On that front, I understand the skepticism.

However, I just really cannot for the life of me understand why anyone would see an overhaul of Frontierlsnd to be a bad thing. Magic Kingdom’s has needed it for decades. It has been tired and stagnant for my whole lifetime and beyond, and the same cannot be said for other versions.

It’s not as if this is the only Disney park in the world. If it was, I would understand why everyone would want it left alone. But you can get the classic Frontierland experience, (that are even better than Magic Kingdom’s) at multiple other parks around the world. I think it’s good that Magic Kingdom’s is the one that gets a change. We’ve all talked for years how Magic Kingdom seems to he the last castle park to ever be considered for something that is completely it’s own. It’s finally getting that, and it’s also addressing a longstanding area of issue with the park.

Whether or not this specific change is the right change I won’t know until it’s open and I can see it. But those who are totally closed off to the idea of something drastically different in the area entirely I feel are at this point refusing to look at the multiple valid reasons for it.

It may not turn out well. It may turn out great. We won’t know until we get there. But pretending Frontierland has been fine and dandy and without need of reinvention to me is just completely ignoring reality.
Well said Mr. Sullivan. I’m optimistic about the project and will withhold judgement until I see it.
 

Centauri Space Station

Well-Known Member
As long as they blow that whistle every 10 minutes. Maybe they think it would be a sad reminder of having a boat that moved around the river that guests could actually ride? I could see how it could make some sense to not include the docked riverboat initially and then bring it back years later where people will just be happy to see it again.
We don’t need this in MK, we have whistles from the ferry infront of the park with the seven seas lagoon
 

TheMaxRebo

Well-Known Member
Won’t tropical Americas have some rocks behind the casita to represent the mountains that keep them from the outside world?

Looks like some rock work but more covered with trees (but some rocks poking through)

1000005231.jpg
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
The original plan always included plenty of water.
Do you happen to know if this will still connect to Seven Seas Lagoon then? I have wondered for the last year how they could just disrupt the flow of water in the park. Perhaps they could have just buried the connections but it seemed strange to leave the Frontierland deck but limit water views just to…spite us?
 

Cliff

Well-Known Member
Well said Mr. Sullivan. I’m optimistic about the project and will withhold judgement until I see it.
If Glendale can assign this project to the team that built Epcot's "World Celebration" and "Dreamers Point" and Moana's Water attraction or maybe even the "Tiana's Bayou Mountain" team?...we should be in great shape. The "Avenger's Campus" team is another one of Imagineering's very best.

Yep, I got lot's of faith in today's current people in Glendale. I'm just glad they pushed out so many of their oldest, most experienced and expensive Imagineers. Y'know,...the ones that were grabbed by Universal and used to make Epic Universe. Those folks.

We are MUCH better off with the new and younger Imagineers, the ones that actually understand today's "modern audience", which is soooo important to every company today.
 

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
We don’t need this in MK, we have whistles from the ferry infront of the park with the seven seas lagoon

You’ve mentioned this a few times in regards to WDW in regards to having all those other bodies of water/ boats across the resort and I think it’s one of the best counter arguments I’ve heard. Disney would be wise to push that narrative a bit. At Disneyland losing the ROA would be absolutely soul crushing and all we’d be left with is the Pixar Pipe lagoon.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom