That coaster in Hollywood on the hillside looks like a lot of funFor those worried about IoA's attendance: Zelda makes the most sense.
For those worried about USFs attendance: F&F coaster replacing RRR, Ghostbusters replacing F&F, and Pokemon replacing Simpsons.
For a great new world: Wicked / Oz is a slam dunk at Epic.
They seem pretty intent on keeping F&F in the parks in some capacity, and a "bare support" coaster is the perfect ride system for it (outside a slot car style ride). Leave the dark rides/special effects for Ghostbusters and other IPs that deserve it.That coaster in Hollywood on the hillside looks like a lot of fun
But for gods sake…they should dump the fast and furious stupidity
Why build rides something so played out?
Fast and the furious is the dumbest thing since unsliced breadThey seem pretty intent on keeping F&F in the parks in some capacity, and a "bare support" coaster is the perfect ride system for it (outside a slot car style ride). Leave the dark rides/special effects for Ghostbusters and other IPs that deserve it.
I'm not a fan either, but a fast roller coaster is an obvious IP tie-in WIN. The real dumbest thing was designing an attraction with the name FAST and FURIOUS and not have the vehicle actually go fast (barely move)? I can't believe they signed off on it.Fast and the furious is the dumbest thing since unsliced bread
Fast and the furious is the dumbest thing since unsliced bread
I agree. Some properties are just not meant for a theme park. There is no whimsy. No magic. Just testosterone and cars.
I always feel like successful theme park experiences need some sort of fantastical element to them. Dinosaurs, Mummies, Magic, Cartoons … where the limits of our world don’t exist, etc.
Even if it’s “heightened reality” it worksI agree. Some properties are just not meant for a theme park. There is no whimsy. No magic. Just testosterone and cars.
I always feel like successful theme park experiences need some sort of fantastical element to them. Dinosaurs, Mummies, Magic, Cartoons … where the limits of our world don’t exist, etc.
Even if it’s “heightened reality” it works
What is that? Just really stupid catering to the lowest common denominator in the depths of the brain![]()
I'm not a fan either, but a fast roller coaster is an obvious IP tie-in WIN. The real dumbest thing was designing an attraction with the name FAST and FURIOUS and not have the vehicle actually go fast (barely move)? I can't believe they signed off on it.
That coaster in Hollywood on the hillside looks like a lot of fun
But for gods sake…they should dump the fast and furious stupidity
Why build rides something so played out?
They seem pretty intent on keeping F&F in the parks in some capacity, and a "bare support" coaster is the perfect ride system for it (outside a slot car style ride). Leave the dark rides/special effects for Ghostbusters and other IPs that deserve it.
Fast and the furious is the dumbest thing since unsliced bread
I'm not a fan either, but a fast roller coaster is an obvious IP tie-in WIN. The real dumbest thing was designing an attraction with the name FAST and FURIOUS and not have the vehicle actually go fast (barely move)? I can't believe they signed off on it.
Check the box office for the franchise, all you need to know.I agree. Some properties are just not meant for a theme park. There is no whimsy. No magic. Just testosterone and cars.
I always feel like successful theme park experiences need some sort of fantastical element to them. Dinosaurs, Mummies, Magic, Cartoons … where the limits of our world don’t exist, etc.
Check the box office for the franchise, all you need to know.
The front office does not care, they point to the BO and say "see people like this" and the edict comes down from on high to build somethingDoesn’t mean it makes good IP for theme park attractions. A show maybe, but a ride? Nah.
At least the coaster makes somewhat sense.
I think it actually does make a great IP for a theme park ride. Car-based attractions have been part of amusement parks since the very beginning, even Disneyland had Autopia. Universal just made a big mistake when they decided to bring the tram tour attraction to Florida which was already not that well received on the studio tour at USH and they are righting their wrongs.Doesn’t mean it makes good IP for theme park attractions. A show maybe, but a ride? Nah.
At least the coaster makes somewhat sense.
I think it actually makes more sense than those examples.Would be kind of like having:
And I'm not even counting M&Gs.
- Harry Potter in 3 parks
- Beauty and the Beast in 3 parks
- Little mermaid in 2 parks
- Nemo in 2 parks
- Frozen in 2 parks
- Lion King in 2 parks
- Muppets in 2 parks
- Star wars in 3 different areas of the same park
- Indiana Jones in 2 parks (coming soon)
- Toy Story in 2 parks
Nintendo the biggest IP they've had since Potter (and it could be argued this is a bigger IP). They would be smart to spread out the love.
Fast and the furious is the dumbest thing since unsliced bread
Does anyone have a building layout for SNW? I'm super interested to know if there would be any way for them to get a queue in/out of the bowser jr. challenge or toadstool cafe side. (Also yes I know the rumor is that is is going to be a concert venue or something... but let me dream, I don't want them using a new portal pad for a SNW expansion.Luigi's Mansion still makes the most sense for Epic. A Yoshi land too.
Zelda should be its own thing. Nintendo always made Zelda feel like the most special of all.
Universal is interesting. They took an abysmal failure of a movie and it’s become one of the most enduring (if not best?) theme park stunt attractions. If I’m not mistaken, they even recently built a Waterworld attraction at one of the overseas parks?That coaster in Hollywood on the hillside looks like a lot of fun
But for gods sake…they should dump the fast and furious stupidity
Why build rides something so played out?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.