Go_Bears_80
New Member
If AD and Tokyo are paying will they get the cream of the imagineering crop and leave the B team for internal projects?
Another assumption or projection with no basis in reality. People will be assigned based on need.
If AD and Tokyo are paying will they get the cream of the imagineering crop and leave the B team for internal projects?
The only parts of WDI that seem to keep stable headcounts (relatively) are DLE and Muppets.Not true and there are plenty of imagineers' stories to back this up that are widely available on the internet... people getting pulled from WDW and Disneyland to work on Paris, Tokyo etc. Unless you really actually think they'd invest in more imagineers just to keep the numbers the same, you'd be sorely mistaken.
Depends on what you include, but Test Track 3.0, Zootopia, the Monsters show, and the Villains show could potentially get bundled in there.
Shows are not attractions... Different category.Wasn't thinking about shows, although they would fall under the attraction banner.
Shows are not attractions... Different category.
Actually it was a question, that’s why I ended the sentence with a question mark.Another assumption or projection with no basis in reality. People will be assigned based on need.
The lands themselves would typically have their own dedicated team. So a project team for the land and each attractions (depending on scope) with a smaller leadership team guiding them all together.Encanto, Indiana Jones, Villains 1, Villains 2, Cars 1, Cars 2, Door Coaster, Tropical Americas Carousel, Muppets Coaster... what are the other 3 for WDW?
I think the Snow White, Dopey, and Sneezy figures are new as well.The Evil Queen/Hag is a new animatronic. It definitely wasn't in Snow White's Scary Adventures.
If AD and Tokyo are paying will they get the cream of the imagineering crop and leave the B team for internal projects?
I think the word you're looking for is "question."Another assumption or projection with no basis in reality.
Yes, those memes are resurfacing because of this deal.Isn't Abu Dhabi where Garfield kept trying to mail Nermal to?
Lets break down this.Nice try at the black and white logical fallacy but no, of course they will continue to do projects all over the place regardless, but they should at minimum be making a decent effort to plus up and expand WDW, and the most visited park on earth, before embarking on an entire new park imo. Also, let's not forget they are boasting that this new park will have the best technology out of all of their parks, which definitely means they do not see any path forward to making the most visited park and theme park resort destination on earth anywhere close to competing with this park...
Its going to be a place we (and i assume the remainder of the US demographic) visit maybe when traveling to the area on business, or as a once/twice in a lifetime type trip. Its not going to be competing for the average US customer base.
That's likely another decent market. I will be honest i hate lay overs and will choose a direct flight if at all possible, price/times notwithstanding so i have a blind spot for that one.I think they are also going after the ‘layover market’. The Middle East has become a key hub for travel between Europe and Asia/Australasia. It’s replaced a lot of the traffic which used to go via Hong Kong / Singapore and Abu Dhabi, Qatar, Dubai etc have spent a lot to build world class airlines
Being able to break your trip between say London and Sydney to spend a few days at the new resort could tip people to travel via AD rather than via somewhere else. Good synergy with the resort and Etihad both effectively being owned by the AD government
The lands themselves would typically have their own dedicated team. So a project team for the land and each attractions (depending on scope) with a smaller leadership team guiding them all together.
I took that to mean that Pueblo Esperanza, Monstropolis, the Villains’ Lair, and all of their associated facilities and entertainment are effectively another attraction each, which is actually less generous than, say, just listing a single entertainment offering separately.He said there were a dozen announced new attractions, though -- I didn't take it as related to how many specific teams were working on things.
Is this a common thing that people do? I haven't personally take a multi-night layover to break up a long trip, but I could see the appeal.I think they are also going after the ‘layover market’. The Middle East has become a key hub for travel between Europe and Asia/Australasia. It’s replaced a lot of the traffic which used to go via Hong Kong / Singapore and Abu Dhabi, Qatar, Dubai etc have spent a lot to build world class airlines
Being able to break your trip between say London and Sydney to spend a few days at the new resort could tip people to travel via AD rather than via somewhere else. Good synergy with the resort and Etihad both effectively being owned by the AD government
I know alot of people going from East Coast to Hawaii who break up the trip with a stop over in CA (actually 2 of my college roomates did it this year, and Disneyland was the layover stop before getting to the islands, so i could see it.Is this a common thing that people do? I haven't personally take a multi-night layover to break up a long trip, but I could see the appeal.
If I was flying from East Coast to Hawaii I would avoid at all costs a stopover in Vegas.I know alot of people going from East Coast to Hawaii who break up the trip with a stop over in CA (actually 2 of my college roomates did it this year, and Disneyland was the layover stop before getting to the islands, so i could see it.
When we were buy we tykes on our first trip to to Disney Land, we did a stop over in Arizona, see some family, grand canyon, then a stop over in vegas, and then Disney Land. Made for a fun trip even if we too young to actually do anythign in vegas.If I was flying from East Coast to Hawaii I would avoid at all costs a stopover in Vegas.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.