MK Cars-Themed Attractions at Magic Kingdom

Disstevefan1

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
AidenRodriguez731 said:
Source: I made it up.

There are FAR easier ways to make money off LL's than this plan. Now merch + LLs, this will sell a boatload but I still think this is them trying to update Frontierland into a new narrative about exploring the American Wilderness and kinda matching "Fort Wilderness" in a way.
Click to expand...
I was half kidding.

Every move they make will now take into consideration LL.

Getting rid of RoA, TSI, the riverboat, gets rid of a maintenance cost for something that brings in zero LL money.

Forget that beauty, theme, tranquility, this is A Business!

Besides that, Disney wants to erase TSI, Liberty square, HoP, Frontierland eventually anyway.
 
Animaniac93-98

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
TrainsOfDisney said:
Is cars land at DCA a money making machine?
Click to expand...

Cars Land is the best attraction in DCA.

Even if the revenue from the shops and eateries in that land don't make a ton of money on their own, the existence of the land is probably a large driver in park attendance, which is important in and of itself.

I think people are taking the success of Cars Land and extrapolating what it did to DCA to believe any Cars attraction or land would be an equal success at another Disney park. We know that's not the case with the two Cars rides at Disney Studios Paris, but even if the two at Magic Kingdom are not as bad, Magic Kingdom is already the most visited theme park in the world and this Cars addition won't have as large a focus on retail/dining.

It comes down to the belief that new rides sell LL and merch. I think that varies based on what's ultimately built.

Cosmic Rewind benefits from being the only coaster in that park, Tron the most intense in MK.

This Cars ride may be the breakout family hit that Seven Dwarfs Mine Train is, or maybe it won't. That's the risk they're taking.
 
WaltWiz1901

WaltWiz1901

Well-Known Member
Brer Panther said:
Pandora only has two rides, Toy Story Land has three but one of them was already there, New Fantasyland only added two actual attractions (three if you consider Enchanted Tales With Belle an attraction, though it's basically just an updated version of the Storytime With Belle thing they already had in Fantasyland)... are they just cheaper than we thought or do they think two new attractions is enough?
Click to expand...
moreso what I bolded. the "7.3 attractions per guest per day" model that shaped opening-day Walt Disney Studios and Hong Kong Disneyland apparently hasn't died, and the many, many systems/services/whatever that NextGen/MyMagic+ spawned have only exacerbated the problems with using said model as a guide for adding/"adding" new attractions

it has nothing to do with being cheap - this is the same company whose waste and ridiculously layered bureaucracy (or is it Imagineering's specifically?) bounce between doing a simple reskin/overhaul for relatively cheap and building grandiosely phoned-in misfires for millions if not billions
 
Bocabear

Bocabear

Well-Known Member
Carsland at DCA works so well because it is a fully realized immersive themed land....to a location we all know from the Cars movie...it is also full of eye candy and clever nods to the film, gorgously done with an amazing big attraction and a couple smaller...with many shops and QS options. I do not know the location for this new Cars attraction, it was not in a Cars movie, there has been talk of a second attraction, but nothing for sure... Villainsland we know even less about...but we do know we will have a gigantic mess in a large quadrant of the park that will drag on for literally years and years...
 
Raineman

Raineman

Well-Known Member
Bocabear said:
Carsland at DCA works so well because it is a fully realized immersive themed land....to a location we all know from the Cars movie...it is also full of eye candy and clever nods to the film, gorgously done with an amazing big attraction and a couple smaller...with many shops and QS options. I do not know the location for this new Cars attraction, it was not in a Cars movie, there has been talk of a second attraction, but nothing for sure... Villainsland we know even less about...but we do know we will have a gigantic mess in a large quadrant of the park that will drag on for literally years and years...
Click to expand...
And, it won't even just be the visual mess of construction walls-the sounds of construction will add to the mess. Instead of hearing the whistle on the riverboat or hearing "Maaark Twaaaain", we'll get to hear the magical sounds of construction equipment and power tools. The sound element of theming in Frontierland/Liberty Square may be just as important, if not more important, to that part of the park than anywhere else.
 
Disstevefan1

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
Casper Gutman said:
You know that part in the old Roadrunner cartoons where the Coyote had run off the cliff but hasn’t looked down yet?
Click to expand...
Iger is a SUUUUUUPER GEEEENIUS
CoyoteIger.jpg
;)
 
Last edited:
D

DCBaker

Premium Member
T

thomas998

Well-Known Member
flynnibus said:
Some income - yes.. but you also described labor intensive stuff that isn't high volume and doesn't run continuously all day, every day, virtually on its own.

Getting an attraction that can sell ILL just prints money. Let's do some super crude math. Take something with 1400 Riders per hour.. give 30% to LL.. let's round down for the non-paid in there too.. so let's say 25% of capacity being sold. That's 350 people /hr paying $20 to ride. Assuming just 13hrs of operating a day.. that's 91k a day. That's over 33 million a year for basically no extra cost over running the ride you are doing anyways. A 300 million dollar ride can pay for itself OUTRIGHT in less than 10yrs.. on an attraction you hope will last 20+years. Nevermind all the other revenue streams like merch, etc a ride generates. That kind of 'free money' will make any exec drunk with to repeat that formula.
Click to expand...
Well... if it is anything like the Radiator Springs at DL they better find a way to keep the crowds of people that pay to ride it and don't get to happy, because I remember quite well the first years of the ride at DL... It was craptastic at best. some days the downtime was as great as the operating time.... I still have nightmares of the 90 minute line that took nearly 5 hours to get through... ride would run for 1 or 2 cars, then shut down for 5 or 10 minutes... If they have those same teething pains it will create way more bad will than anything else. No one likes to pay for something only to find it isn't available.
 
Charlie The Chatbox Ghost

Charlie The Chatbox Ghost

Well-Known Member
AidenRodriguez731 said:
To me, especially with this. It's more about exploring the different regions/biomes of Western American (by Western I do mean specifically past the original 13 colonies. Everything currently announced fits into that descriptions as we are exploring a little town in Tennesse (Frontierland shops/CBMJ), then moving out into the Bayous of Louisiana, Crossing the deserty expanse of Arizona before finally turning to explore the Redwood Forests/Geyser state parks of California/West Coast. If we are a SLIGHTLY generous with BTM's timing, you can even line up the dates of each attraction slowly increasing. CBMJ explitcly takes place in the early 1900s, Tiana's in around 1920-1930s, Big Thunder can actually take place at any time after the 1900s seemingly since the town is already abandoned and the founder of the Mining Company is seemingly long dead anyway, and then Cars can take place obviously more towards the present.
Click to expand...
The Country Bears have to be 1928 at the earliest, as 1928 is when Ursus H. Bear died, and sometime after then, his grandson Henry took over the role of master of ceremonies. CBJ was meant to emulate the vaudeville of Marc Davis’s youth, so I’d say it’s no later than the 30s, even if a good chunk of the songs are from the 60s. If Tiana’s is in the 30s the timeline still works!
 
Charlie The Chatbox Ghost

Charlie The Chatbox Ghost

Well-Known Member
Agent H said:
I think The new show has to set at least after 2013 because that’s when frozen come out and I think fixer upper is the newest song in the show.
Click to expand...
The new show never acknowledges the songs are from movies, it treats them as just any old song like the other shows treated their songs, so for all we know, in the world of the Country Bears it could be any time period. The show features electric guitars, meaning it would be 1932 at the earliest, and likely the 50s-60s as that’s when they really became common. Given Ursus is still born in 1848, the show can’t be too modern with Henry still being his grandson. Ursus lived to 80, and Henry seems to be no older than 40. Assuming Ursus had his kid at 25 and that kid had their kid at 25, we’d land at 1938. But given Romeo is meant to be an Elvis type, and Trixie’s outfit is definitely more modern…. Urgh. Maybe the bears exist in a weird space time vacuum where Ursus died in 1928 but they’re all still young in the late 1900s or even 2000s.

I’m thinking too much about bear lore, I need to sleep lmao.
 
Agent H

Agent H

Well-Known Member
Charlie The Chatbox Ghost said:
The new show never acknowledges the songs are from movies, it treats them as just any old song like the other shows treated their songs, so for all we know, in the world of the Country Bears it could be any time period. The show features electric guitars, meaning it would be 1932 at the earliest, and likely the 50s-60s as that’s when they really became common. Given Ursus is still born in 1848, the show can’t be too modern with Henry still being his grandson. Ursus lived to 80, and Henry seems to be no older than 40. Assuming Ursus had his kid at 25 and that kid had their kid at 25, we’d land at 1938. But given Romeo is meant to be an Elvis type, and Trixie’s outfit is definitely more modern…. Urgh. Maybe the bears exist in a weird space time vacuum where Ursus died in 1928 but they’re all still young in the late 1900s or even 2000s.

I’m thinking too much about bear lore, I need to sleep lmao.
Click to expand...
The ancient god that is the thunderbird is manipulating time itself?
 
Last edited:
TheMaxRebo

TheMaxRebo

Well-Known Member
Charlie The Chatbox Ghost said:
The new show never acknowledges the songs are from movies, it treats them as just any old song like the other shows treated their songs, so for all we know, in the world of the Country Bears it could be any time period. The show features electric guitars, meaning it would be 1932 at the earliest, and likely the 50s-60s as that’s when they really became common. Given Ursus is still born in 1848, the show can’t be too modern with Henry still being his grandson. Ursus lived to 80, and Henry seems to be no older than 40. Assuming Ursus had his kid at 25 and that kid had their kid at 25, we’d land at 1938. But given Romeo is meant to be an Elvis type, and Trixie’s outfit is definitely more modern…. Urgh. Maybe the bears exist in a weird space time vacuum where Ursus died in 1928 but they’re all still young in the late 1900s or even 2000s.

I’m thinking too much about bear lore, I need to sleep lmao.
Click to expand...

I think they are just trying to make the area more "timeless" vs being set in a specific time period. Still that feeling of exploration of the Americas but not in a specific time

Which is similar to the other lands (other than Main St, though even that has a Castle at the end of it as the weenie) - but Adventureland is in the "past" but Jungle Cruise, Carpets, Pirates, would all be different times. And tomorrowland is in the "future" (or retro future) but Mosters, Space Mtn, Carousel of Progress, etc are all at different times.
 
A

AidenRodriguez731

Well-Known Member
Charlie The Chatbox Ghost said:
The new show never acknowledges the songs are from movies, it treats them as just any old song like the other shows treated their songs, so for all we know, in the world of the Country Bears it could be any time period. The show features electric guitars, meaning it would be 1932 at the earliest, and likely the 50s-60s as that’s when they really became common. Given Ursus is still born in 1848, the show can’t be too modern with Henry still being his grandson. Ursus lived to 80, and Henry seems to be no older than 40. Assuming Ursus had his kid at 25 and that kid had their kid at 25, we’d land at 1938. But given Romeo is meant to be an Elvis type, and Trixie’s outfit is definitely more modern…. Urgh. Maybe the bears exist in a weird space time vacuum where Ursus died in 1928 but they’re all still young in the late 1900s or even 2000s.

I’m thinking too much about bear lore, I need to sleep lmao.
Click to expand...
Honestly I like the joke idea/head cannon that the Bears in universe created the songs that would eventually become the Disney songs and Romeo's outfit inspired Elvis's outfit/style later on. Just feels like a funny way of doing it.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom