-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
MK Cars-Themed Attractions at Magic Kingdom
- Thread starter wdwmagic
- Start date
Ayla
Well-Known Member
They are getting rid of the Jungle Cruise.
SoFloMagic
Well-Known Member
Couldn't agree more. Give me europe or asia any day. Yet thousands see disney world as the holy grail of vacations.
I agree. But they were never going to redo the island. If they make it cool, the rafts dont have the capacity for the interest. At some point you're building a bridge and getting rid of the steamboat anyway. And then you've got that massive space tied up for a walk through attraction.
Andrew C
You know what's funny?
It is a rite of passage for many Americans, and they will only go once. Doesn't mean they don't do other "once in a lifetime" trips.
Disstevefan1
Well-Known Member
Disney's desire to destroy it is greater than their desire to keep it.
We must all keep in mind, Disney will do what is in their best interest, not what's in the best interest of the park or the guest. As many has said, its a business.
SoFloMagic
Well-Known Member
Gusey
Well-Known Member
Because opening a new ride for the Magic Kingdom next to the All-Star Resorts (undeveloped land on property) makes complete sense. Just make Walt Disney World one big theme park with one entrance fee, then they can build attractions on all that undeveloped land and say its part of Magic Kingdom.
People saying that RoA/TSI are underutized space that can be redevloped for more popular Magic Kingdom attractions are taking into consideration the potential places around the Magic Kingdom where expansion could happen with minimal impact. Of course, it would be great if they used up all the expansion plots already, but then there would be no expansion plots in 10 years time and they'd have to replace what's already in the park. It's just an inevitable part of the theme park industry that attractions have a shelf life and if they don't get updated, they close and (for the most part) get replaced
Raineman
Well-Known Member
One could argue that the Cars attractions do not need to be placed in/around MK, especially given the trend of thematic integrity being not as vital as it was before. Cars Land would work well at DHS-some people think ROA/TSI is underutilized space and don't care if it's removed; I could say the same thing about the Indy Stunt show at DHS. And I've seen similar statements to yours regarding expansion plots, so I'll ask-what are they being saved for? Why do they need all of them to still be available in 10 years, or 15 years, or 20 years? And they have already been replacing existing areas/attractions even with the expansion plots still available.
Bocabear
Well-Known Member
I would much rather see them overhaul the mess of Tomorrowland in a good and meaningful way, reactivate the old Alien Encounter space with something new, Boot the Monsters over to DHS, replace that woith something that fits the theme of the land and add another new attraction to the Galaxy Theater expansion space... Also the Speedway seriously needs something to make it feel like it belongs in a Disney park... Tomorrowland really needed to be fixed before they move forward with another expansion...
solidyne
Well-Known Member
erasure fan1
Well-Known Member
That's very true. But I'd rather see that than replacing attractions while there are open spots. Especially in Florida, they need extra capacity. I'm more of a cross that bridge when we come to it guy on this topic.
Bocabear
Well-Known Member
In 20 years when they need new expansion plots they will undoubtedly just replace an existing attraction....they are doing that now when they still have room to expand without removing attractions.....and quite frankly thay have 4 parks all in need of additional capacity... some more than others... They really need to address those before tearing out more existing attractions.....
Fox&Hound
Well-Known Member
You have to consider the business of running a theme park. They don't want to use all of their underdeveloped land right away. They want to build on that land every ten years or so, bringing guests back to discover the joys of the parks. The guests who have been away for some time. Imagine if they had used them all 20 years ago and we were looking at Atlantis attractions, Great Mouse Detective Land, and Oliver and Company the ride. I think their approach makes sense. TSI is underutilized and even if we are sad to see the island and surrounding water go, I have hopes they will build something really impressive.
Gusey
Well-Known Member
But if they only focused on the other 3 parks, people would be saying MK doesn't get anything new. Investment in the parks are literally on rotation, with only AK getting less consistent investment. Since New Fantasyland opened in 2012, here are each parks major new offerings:
- MK: 7 Dwarfs (2014), Tron (2023), Tiana's (2024), Cars (2029?) Villains (2030?) - 5
- Epcot: Frozen Ever After (2016), Ratatouille (2021), Guardians (2023), Moana/Epcot Spine (2023) - 4
- HS: Toy Story Land (2018), Star Wars Galaxy's Edge (2019), MMRR (2020), Monsters (2028?) - 4
- AK: Pandora (2017), Tropical Americas (2027) - 2
TrainsOfDisney
Well-Known Member
Most of us are armchair imagineers - I know I’ve studied the business and operations of theme parks and entertainment businesses.
The magic kingdom is the worlds #1 most visited theme park. It has not been developed well. There is so much potential.
Did new fantasyland take the plot that was going to be used for fire mountain? Cause if not, a Villians attraction could be built there.
And then Moana by Adventureland. And the Main Street theatre. Let’s do that first please!
UNCgolf
Well-Known Member
I personally would be completely on board with replacing Jungle Cruise; I don't think it's a good attraction and they could add so much (probably multiple rides, dining, and shopping) in its footprint. I'd want the one at Disneyland to remain as Walt's attraction, but would happily dump the MK version (assuming the replacement was actually good -- certainly not anything related to the Incredibles).
Last edited:
UNCgolf
Well-Known Member
Probably -- the biggest issue is that anything they build there is going to need to be fully themed from almost every direction because nearly everything will be guest facing inside the park.
Disgruntled Walt
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- No
If they get rid of the Jungle Cruise AND the RoA, that would be awful. And I love the temple scene in MK's Jungle Cruise...it's really unique!
Agent H
Well-Known Member
I understand that you personally don’t like the jungle cruise but I would wonder why they would do that when there’s a perfectly good expansion area between it and pirates.