James Alucobond
Well-Known Member
Old Faithful Inn is not a ski chalet.When I think of Frontierland I immediately think of a ski chalet
Old Faithful Inn is not a ski chalet.When I think of Frontierland I immediately think of a ski chalet
Disney did not stop the retheme of DCA's Tower of Terror, nor the retheme of GMR due to a cry from the fanbase. Or attempts at petitions.Once again deluded myself. I thought Disney would use tariffs or some other excuse to cancel the demolition of ROA. Use current events as cover to get out from under the bad press. Maybe focus on the villains land instead of becoming a villain.
Disney did not stop the retheme of DCA's Tower of Terror, nor the retheme of GMR due to a cry from the fanbase. Or attempts at petitions.
This will be no different for weal or woe.
I read his post differently. There is nothing "positive" about this. Sure, it's a concrete sign. It's an affirmative sign. It's a measurable sign. It's a likely sign. But it's not a "positive" sign that this project is moving forward.You keep talking like this is not happening, and it clearly is. Could you please stop, unless you have some evidence that this project is abandoned.
Disney doesn't like the past so therefore Disney destroys.I don't know why anyone thinks Disney wants an excuse to cancel the demolition of ROA. Disney wants to demolish the ROA, it's that simple.
I'd imagine they'd classify it more like Fantasyland. It's all Fantasyland but there is also "Enchanted Forest" outside of the castle walls.Previously, there's been a back and forth over whether this is still Frontierland, or, by having this "mini-land" it is its own land and thus, not part of Frontierland.
Disney has not called it a "land" officially AFAIK.
There is a story floating around that the Country Bears were to be changed to a Toy Story puppet show and it was fans who forced Disney to update and keep Country bears.Disney did not stop the retheme of DCA's Tower of Terror, nor the retheme of GMR due to a cry from the fanbase. Or attempts at petitions.
This will be no different for weal or woe.
Totally agree, this is so stupid. So wrong. But it will sell LLsThis is so stupid. So wrong.
And that's all Disney cares about.I think Len meant "positive" in the sense that it is positively (affirmatively) confirmed. Value-neutral.You are incorrect. I just fixed Len's post to say is a sign they're moving forward.
To say destroying RoA a positive thing is subjective. Its positive for some but not for all.
OK Yes, I admit permits for the project trailers have been filed. and construction on the project trailers will begin in 2025.
RoA, TSI and the riverboat will probably be destroyed eventually, but a person can dream, cant they?
You know you're right!I think Len meant "positive" in the sense that it is positively (affirmitavely) confirmed. Value-neutral.
I think so. "Positive sign" means "it is likely to be." It doesn't necessarily mean "good thing."You know you're right!
Like I am positive this Cars thing will be a huge mistake![]()
I don't have any recollection of Old Faithful Inn in the Cars movies... I saw snow and something that ;looked like a ski chalet... Glad it is not a ski chalet... Still doesn't feel like the right location for the IP... So can we look forward to a Beauty and The Beast ride set in Tahiti? I mean it was settled by French planters.....Old Faithful Inn is not a ski chalet.
IIRC, it's called the Grand Fusel Lodge in Planes: Fire & Rescue, but it's based on Old Faithful Inn and located in the Cars equivalent of Yellowstone.I don't have any recollection of Old Faithful Inn in the Cars movies... I saw snow and something that ;looked like a ski chalet... Glad it is not a ski chalet... Still doesn't feel like the right location for the IP...
It's the only way to reach and repair the sewer. Reminds me of EPCOT getting torn up. So yes, I think they want to do some extensive digging there come what may.I don't know why anyone thinks Disney wants an excuse to cancel the demolition of ROA. Disney wants to demolish the ROA, it's that simple.
Didn't you hear @wdwmagic that all pending Disney projects have been cancelled due to the tarrifs or because the ideas are unpopular with the fandom here? /sYou keep talking like this is not happening, and it clearly is. Could you please stop, unless you have some evidence that this project is abandoned.
Details at https://www.wdwmagic.com/attraction...-future-cars-themed-land-at-magic-kingdom.htmWhere does it say these trailers are for the Cars project? Could it, technically, be for the Villains project? Or even if it IS for Cars, wouldn't the trailers be in the same place if they moved Cars further back and kept the RoA?
Technically they could be for Villians and not cars. But that seems like .01% chance.Where does it say these trailers are for the Cars project? Could it, technically, be for the Villains project? Or even if it IS for Cars, wouldn't the trailers be in the same place if they moved Cars further back and kept the RoA?
Disney absolutely does not want an excuse to cancel, they WANT to destroy RoA!I don't know why anyone thinks Disney wants an excuse to cancel the demolition of ROA. Disney wants to demolish the ROA, it's that simple.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.