Animaniac93-98
Well-Known Member
The DLP river is not 55 years old and in need of extensive maintenance.
What extensive maintenance would be required to continue operating WDW's Rivers of America?
The DLP river is not 55 years old and in need of extensive maintenance.
Except that DLP's river is incorporated into Big Thunder Mountain thanks to the track gong under it.That DLP is adding to its version of the RoA at least partially undermines the argument that the RoA is an underutilized space.
100%. Also missing the fact that the French market is different to WDW’s. AFAIK DLP is one of those parks that see a lot of people from France who go multiple times so having their walkthroughs and areas to relax make more sense for the less busy grindset that once in a lifetime/once in a decade WDW travelers go throughNot really. The situations are entirely different. The DLP river is not 55 years old and in need of extensive maintenance. DLP does not have significant issues with park capacity. The company has no intentions of massive investment in DLP. So even if their river suffers the same issues of lack of utilization there is no pressing need or desire to address that.
It doesn’t feel as messy as Florida and California. Philharmagic is the only true issue.Paris continues to stay winning as the best castle park! (Even if they also have the Tomorrowland problem, but all Tomorrowlands do)
So? There might be limits on what could be placed directly above the track, but it doesn’t require the water to be present.Except that DLP's river is incorporated into Big Thunder Mountain thanks to the track gong under it.
It also doesn’t require water to surround it - they could fill in the majority if they wanted to.So? There might be limits on what could be placed directly above the track, but it doesn’t require the water to be present.
The “extensive maintenance” line is such a trope. MK has far lower hanging fruit to expand park capacity than replacing the RoA.Not really. The situations are entirely different. The DLP river is not 55 years old and in need of extensive maintenance. DLP does not have significant issues with park capacity. The company has no intentions of massive investment in DLP. So even if their river suffers the same issues of lack of utilization there is no pressing need or desire to address that.
It’s funny that no one can give a straight answer. They performed massive maintenance just a few years ago on the river which they also seem to forget.What extensive maintenance would be required to continue operating WDW's Rivers of America?
Just pointing out a fact that part of the theme of DLP's BTM is that it is on an island in the middle of the river, including a splashdown section into the water. The water is part of the reason that it is the best version of BTMSo? There might be limits on what could be placed directly above the track, but it doesn’t require the water to be present.
Fair. I’d personally also replace Buzz and maybe Star Tours, because they don’t match aesthetically. Bring back Timekeeper (maybe keep the bones of Buzz and do a Timekeeper shooting ride with a steampunk/Verne aesthetic) and replace PhilHar with a Sci-Fi show.It doesn’t feel as messy as Florida and California. Philharmagic is the only true issue.
I’m betting you’ve never been involved in the maintenance of the River and the attractions/infrastructure in and around it.The “extensive maintenance” line is such a trope. MK has far lower hanging fruit to expand park capacity than replacing the RoA.
It’s funny that no one can give a straight answer. They performed massive maintenance just a few years ago on the river which they also seem to forget.
The Rivers of America is part of the theme and the central focus of the spatial of organization of Frontierland and Liberty Square.Just pointing out a fact that part of the theme of DLP's BTM is that it is on an island in the middle of the river, including a splashdown section into the water. The water is part of the reason that it is the best version of BTM
What extensive maintenance? It’s a simple concrete pad.I’m betting you’ve never been involved in the maintenance of the River and the attractions/infrastructure in and around it.
I’m assuming the lower hanging fruit you’re referring to is the speedway. Which while partially true is not really equivalent.
They did perform maintenance a few years ago. It was largely limited to necessary track work for the riverboat that could no longer be put off. It looked extensive so the draining but the work was not major. Much more work needed to be done but was not because they already knew this was coming.
What extensive maintenance? It’s a simple concrete pad.
So? It’s not holding anything up. It doesn’t even need a solid bottom.Its concrete slabs on a sand base. They move.
So? It’s not holding anything up. It doesn’t even need a solid bottom.
Everything about the WDW resort is complicated. We somehow went from building the vacation kingdom of the world on top of a swamp to not being able to maintain a simple canal? (When much larger navigable bodies of water exist all over the property).I’m betting you’ve never been involved in the maintenance of the River and the attractions/infrastructure in and around it.
So? It’s not holding anything up. It doesn’t even need a solid bottom.
I never said anything about “not being able to maintain” the river and impacted attractions and infrastructure. Of course they could be maintained.Everything about the WDW resort is complicated. We somehow went from building the vacation kingdom of the world on top of a swamp to not being able to maintain a simple canal? (When much larger navigable bodies of water exist all over the property).
But none of that matters - they could have easily included a new / fixed canal in the plans with or without cars and Villians. Smaller, yes, but it could still exist.
People were talking about why DLP's rivers are getting an update and not WDW's. I was just providing a reason. I can't be bothered to get into another debate about why I'm ok with WDW's RoA going as it just gets shouted down on here.The Rivers of America is part of the theme and the central focus of the spatial of organization of Frontierland and Liberty Square.
Structurally they are different as the Rivers of America has a completely concrete base. The big advantage is that lets you easily maintain its form and edge. It’s also less desirable a medium for living organisms. The guide rail could be on something like a narrow pad or individual piers.It's just for the riverboat's guiderail to have something to attach to correct?
Otherwise the RoA is structurally the same as the Seven Seas Lagoon, to which it is connected.
Both are man made bodies of water that do not support or sit over other structures or are dependent on them.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.