MrPromey
Well-Known Member
Is there any reason to believe those weren’t the biggest expansions at the time?
Depending on the metric, not at all. Most acreage? Absolutely in at least one instance* but that's never what they're solely implying when they say that and they know it.
They like to play loosely with the meaning of words, just like when Iger said that 7DMT was the first attraction that was guest facing on all sides.
Not to get too political but it's like when people want to argue over what technically constitutes "war plans" as a way of avoiding the true point - obviously, saying Disney's tone-deaf marketing is a lot less important would be an understatement. As a fan and consumer, it's just annoying.
My point was basically, don't be surprised if "biggest expansion in park history" ends up amounting to an e-ticket, a c/d ticket and a lot of retail which barely constitutes calling something a "land" in the traditional sense while technically being true that it does create a lot of underutilized sprawl in the park at a level never seen before there.
*SWL, for sure although NFL is up for debate since much of that space had previously been part of 20k leagues before being taken away and another major chunk was Mickey's Tune Town with much of the original infrastructure staying as a part of the "new" land. Then, in terms of attraction count with what had been lost there previously and what was closed to add, the net gain isn't nearly that impressive unless there is a time limit on when something goes from being permanently closed without replacement to virgin guest facing space for development.
Last edited: