AdventureHasAName
Well-Known Member
Of course you did. You plainly stated what you think she should have done (as did I). That is a recommended course of action.I didn’t recommend any course of action.
Of course you did. You plainly stated what you think she should have done (as did I). That is a recommended course of action.I didn’t recommend any course of action.
The way I interpreted this is:The great thing is, all those kids under 12 need a parent to also buy a ticket to take them to see SW.
It's great Disney makes movies they want to make and that make their Stakeholders happy.
It would also be great if they also made movies that are profitable to make their Shareholders happy too.
We've seen it a bunch. RDJ as iron Man, Evans as cap... Lots of questions and criticism of the choices. The big difference is competent filmmaking. People have always looked at these types of characters with a critical eye. Its up to the people making the film to prove those people wrong. The problem is, it sure doesn't seem snow white has done that. And even if it was great and Zegler was a standout performance, her comments kneecapped any chance of people saying, wow she was great, I got that one totally wrong.I can only imagine how heated this would have gotten had the internet been around back in the 80's when this was announced:
Actually I don't remember all that much outrage. I remember some people scratching their head a bit. but all in all the excitement for batman 89 was fever pitch by me. It was nothing like what's happened with snow white.Does anybody here remember the outrage when Michael Keaton was announced to play Batman in the 1989 film? It was brutal.
"New songs, some added scenes, a couple new characters people will love. I'm not sure what I'm allowed to share because Disney has sworn us to secrecy to maintain the surprises!"And the followup question would have been, "Yeah but how is it going to be different or is it going to be the same?".
And if the question is dodged again it'll come across as if she is hiding something, and that would have been a different kind of drama that people would have jumped at and lost their mind about.
You assume that Shareholders care how much they spent on their latest movie. I never really see one question at any shareholder meeting or earnings call from anyone complaining the movie budgets are too high.The could make both Stakeholders and Shareholders happy if they had control of their movie budgets.
We know they know how to control budgets - See their theme park business.
Sounds like Disney World circa-2025The way I interpreted this is:
Little girls love it.
Dads hated it.
Moms tolerate it because it made the little girls happy.
No I just explained what she did (answer direct questions) and why she did it (the purpose of questioning is to elicit answers).Of course you did. You plainly stated what you think she should have done (as did I). That is a recommended course of action.
And we've all seen how well that goes over when stuff like that is said for an MCU film."New songs, some added scenes, a couple new characters people will love. I'm not sure what I'm allowed to share because Disney has sworn us to secrecy to maintain the surprises!"
Did Disney swear her to secrecy to maintain the surprise? If not, wouldn’t that have been a lie?"New songs, some added scenes, a couple new characters people will love. I'm not sure what I'm allowed to share because Disney has sworn us to secrecy to maintain the surprises!"
I'm willing to bet there is a non-disclosure clause in the contract of every Disney actor. I have no idea what it covers or doesn't cover.Did Disney swear her to secrecy to maintain the surprise? If not, wouldn’t that have been a lie?
Do you know what a non-disclosure clause is? Your statement makes no sense.I'm willing to bet there is a non-disclosure clause in the contract of every Disney actor. I have no idea what it covers or doesn't cover.
For what its worth all the parents, but mom and dads alike, at my screening last night looked like they were into the movie. And all the kids were under 12, so that fits with what was said in the Deadline article (the one I original quotedThe way I interpreted this is:
Little girls love it.
Dads hated it.
Moms tolerate it because it made the little girls happy.
Shareholders care about making a profit you know this.You assume that Shareholders care how much they spent on their latest movie.
“But she called the prince a stalker!”"I hate actors because they are so fake."
"I hate this actor because she isn't fake enough."
I don’t think it’s outrage, I think people make hard choices on what movies they see at the theater.I do not understand being outraged.
When I see Disney do what I know is a mistake I just laugh and shake my head.
I will admit, I get a little sad for the loss of the castle lights at Christmastime, the Osborne lights and the loss of RoA, TSI and the riverboat but there is nothing to be done but to laugh and shake my head again.
Disney is gonna do what Disney's gonna do and there is nothing we can do to stop it.
The Prince makes out with a corpse. That has to count for something.“But she called the prince a stalker!”
This is the prince who doesn’t have a name and isn’t in the film long enough to invoke the stalking laws.
He shows up, Snow White looks and him and it’s true love. Presumably the guy in the remake has to work at least a little harder. Apparently that’s offensive.
Come on, guys. How little effort are you willing to expend in the name of true love?![]()
Shareholders care about the overall profitability of the company, not individual movies. As long as the overall entertainment division is profitable, which it has been, they don't care if movies go over budget.Shareholders care about making a profit you know this.
If Disney could control their movie budgets they could make the movies they want and keep their Stakeholders happy and at the same time keep their Shareholders happy by making movies that are profitable.
Right I forgot that he “saves” her by kissing her. Didn’t even have to slay a dragon.The Prince makes out with a corpse. That has to count for something.
I don’t know? Ask my wife. Why do many women love that scene? What makes it so iconic?“But she called the prince a stalker!”
This is the prince who doesn’t have a name and isn’t in the film long enough to invoke the stalking laws.
He shows up, Snow White looks and him and it’s true love. Presumably the guy in the remake has to work at least a little harder. Apparently that’s offensive.
Come on, guys. How little effort are you willing to expend in the name of true love?![]()
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.