Listen to this guy. He's right there in your head.
It's probably crowded in there.
Do we really expect them to do so now? LOL
I do not. I assume Disney does not either. Which is what I was asking about. Not if they're good or bad or whatnot, but why have a rule that's meaningless.
Its the cousin to the warning signs on attractions about heart conditions, pregnancy etc. its intended to shift liability. Its a second cousin to the signs everywhere in California disclosing that the state of California knows everything causes cancer.
There's a difference though, and one that likely makes this not as CYA as they would hope. The heart condition, pregnancy, and cancer risks are to the individual who is following or breaking the rule. As far as masks go, the individual protection component is exactly the same. So, I would agree that someone who goes to Disney, chooses not to wear a mask (vaccinated or not) and catches COVID, they're on their own.
However, half (or more depending on your thoughts) the mask protection is as source control. In that case the person at risk isn't the one breaking the rule but someone else who was counting on others to follow the rule. (Go ahead, laugh at that. For anyone expecting unvaccinated people to wear a mask, I've got some cheap Cinderella's reservations for you, I swear.

).
So, back to the large Coke on Test Track. If it splashes out of my hand as the ride moves an hits another car. It's the people in the other car that are impacted. They're going to be super mad and complain to Disney about the unpleasantness. Someone seated in a theater with unvaccinated people not wearing a mask is likely to be mad too. Probably not as mad as the Coke incident, since see above about expectations, but mad anyway.