Lee
Adventurer
You mean the day when he didn't want his photo taken with Imagination behind him?He does talk to you about it when asked. I had a great chat with him about the current pavilion a few years back.
;-)
You mean the day when he didn't want his photo taken with Imagination behind him?He does talk to you about it when asked. I had a great chat with him about the current pavilion a few years back.
Yep. Came out nice.You mean the day when he didn't want his photo taken with Imagination behind him?
;-)
Last I saw, some of the insiders had basically said they they are keeping Tony on the west coast for the known future. The only other mention was actually (and this may be interesting with today's news) one person talking about a Tony Baxter attraction in Frontierland.Fantastic, any chance of Tony leading an overhaul of Imagination! and a return to it's former glory then?
Last I saw, some of the insiders had basically said they they are keeping Tony on the west coast for the known future. The only other mention was actually (and this may be interesting with today's news) one person talking about a Tony Baxter attraction in Frontierland.
Of course, all I am doing is relating hearsay here. I read both of these things here in these forums, so I can vouch for them only on the merit that folks tend to trust the info of the people saying it.
Let's hope that Tony's comments represent somewhat of a breakup of the logjam that might occur when plans to alter the pavilion are on the horizon. Can't think of many places in FW that have so much potential to be a standout attraction... instead of the distilled sideshow we have right now. Time for a re-imagination!Fantastic, any chance of Tony leading an overhaul of Imagination! and a return to it's former glory then?
Maybe if someone recommended that they put a Starbucks upstairs in the old image works while they reinstalled the original attraction we might get some movement on it.I've heard that too, these days I ask more in blind hope than expectation . I find it ironic that the man who created the original version of the attraction and John Lasseter are both known to dislike the current version and yet nothing is seemingly going to get done about it.
Don't blame them, blame the sharp pencil boys.I've heard that too, these days I ask more in blind hope than expectation . I find it ironic that the man who created the original version of the attraction and John Lasseter are both known to dislike the current version and yet nothing is seemingly going to get done about it.
Don't blame them, blame the sharp pencil boys.
How do we blame the sharp pencil boys when it would have been cheaper to keep the original?Don't blame them, blame the sharp pencil boys.
Contracts...How do we blame the sharp pencil boys when it would have been cheaper to keep the original?
Because that is a scenario that is not currently possible due to the fact that the boneheaded decision to replace it is now 14 year old history.How do we blame the sharp pencil boys when it would have been cheaper to keep the original?
Contracts... If they had any IMAGINATION they could have found a way to do an extensive rehab of the original (ie advanced AAs) and called it a "new" attraction.
That is not as silly a question as one might think!How do we blame the sharp pencil boys when it would have been cheaper to keep the original?
Don't! They could hear you! It will be your fault, you know... So, lets at least try to keep "ideas" like that on the DL and, hopefully, they won't be running off with them... Scary.Maybe if someone recommended that they put a Starbucks upstairs in the old image works while they reinstalled the original attraction we might get some movement on it.
I think one of the worst parts of today's Imagination is that it's conditioning kids and first-timers to think this is "EPCOT" and "Walt Disney World." That this is the best they can do, and what they should feel all excited and "magical" about.
He does talk to you about it when asked. I had a great chat with him about the current pavilion a few years back.
That could be true to an extent and man, would it be nice it that were true, but it seems to me with how close Tony and John are, it comes across (again, to me at least) that the relationship itself gives Tony a bit more clout to say what's on his mind without the fear of consequences. I mean, Tony saying things to people in the parks, he has to know its going to make its way out into the forum-sphere with his name attached.
Wasn't there someone who said that John rode Imagination once and when he got off he said something to the effect, "What are we going to do about this?"
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.