Is it less than $17B?What I think would save the ROA is just how expensive it would be to fill it in.
Is it less than $17B?What I think would save the ROA is just how expensive it would be to fill it in.
Depends if they fill it with singles or hundredsIs it less than $17B?
Recently released picture of DesertLand...
View attachment 778436
Tho it looks deserted, it is full of kinetic energy. But you won't see it. Just trust the narrative!!
Exhaustion and dehydrationWe at Disney can't wait to see the great stories our guests will create in this magical space. You are the story!
There isn’t one. They’re not restrained by how much land they have like they were in Anaheim. It wouldn’t save them much money either. They would lose needed capacity for years.What’s the point of filling in ROA?
The most I see them doing is shortening the ROA and adding in the beautiful canyon area with the water falls that they did for DL, well that's what I hope they would do, also it would give more people a reason to go on the riverboat and RR.There isn’t one. They’re not restrained by how much land they have like they were in Anaheim. It wouldn’t save them much money either. They would lose needed capacity for years.
It won’t matter. Every body of fresh water in FL has snakes and gators. They crawl and get everywhere. I have a lake behind me and a lake across the street. Once had a gator come knocking on my glass door in the middle of the night! Insane. The gator catcher was a 5’6” blond lady who was tough as nails and caught the thing while multiple deputies stood by in amazement. It was truly a sight to behold. Anyways, the water system at WDW is all carefully connected.They don’t have to eliminate it completely, but here is one guess why they might want to cut it off from the greater resort water system: Better alligator control.
This is why I will never live in Florida.It won’t matter. Every body of fresh water in FL has snakes and gators. They crawl and get everywhere. I have a lake behind me and a lake across the street. Once had a gator come knocking on my glass door in the middle of the night! Insane. The gator catcher was a 5’6” blond lady who was tough as nails and caught the thing while multiple deputies stood by in amazement. It was truly a sight to behold. Anyways, the water system at WDW is all carefully connected.
Well did you invite him in? Maybe he just wanted to warm up a bitIt won’t matter. Every body of fresh water in FL has snakes and gators. They crawl and get everywhere. I have a lake behind me and a lake across the street. Once had a gator come knocking on my glass door in the middle of the night! Insane. The gator catcher was a 5’6” blond lady who was tough as nails and caught the thing while multiple deputies stood by in amazement. It was truly a sight to behold. Anyways, the water system at WDW is all carefully connected.
ETA: the gator was easily between 5’-6’, not the biggest but still large!
They don’t have to eliminate it completely, but here is one guess why they might want to cut it off from the greater resort water system: Better alligator control.
ROA takes up as much space as all of TSL, including the TSMM buildings. That's 7 Haunted Mansions.What’s the point of filling in ROA?
umm... technically...It won’t matter. Every body of fresh water in FL has snakes and gators. They crawl and get everywhere. I have a lake behind me and a lake across the street. Anyways, the water system at WDW is all carefully connected.
You are only thinking of land availability. However, you have to account for the loss of access to maintenance for the Lilly Bell with the expansion north of BTMRR. If they lose that, then you might as well either dock the boat permanently and convert to restaurant(which I believe was one rumor that was floating around), and then potentially convert TSI to some other. So losing the ROA would give full access and more space for whatever they may be adding to do it.There isn’t one. They’re not restrained by how much land they have like they were in Anaheim. It wouldn’t save them much money either. They would lose needed capacity for years.
Unfortunately it's not just Florida. We have blondes here as well.This is why I will never live in Florida.
I'm not convinced they're willing to spend the money to fill in the ROA. That's a lot of expensive work just to get to a blank slate, from which they'll then build new stuff.You are only thinking of land availability. However, you have to account for the loss of access to maintenance for the Lilly Bell with the expansion north of BTMRR. If they lose that, then you might as well either dock the boat permanently and convert to restaurant(which I believe was one rumor that was floating around), and then potentially convert TSI to some other. So losing the ROA would give full access and more space for whatever they may be adding to do it.
I don't fully disagree. However, how you "hide" or allow the out exit for Lilly Bell and build and tie in expansion north could be just as challenging or expensive. Who knows.I'm not convinced they're willing to spend the money to fill in the ROA. That's a lot of expensive work just to get to a blank slate, from which they'll then build new stuff.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.