copcarguyp71
Well-Known Member
Yup...I agree with that BUT the other post that was quoted in my own post made it sound like 63 people were the only ones who were against it. It was a convenient misuse of data and I really needed to point that out. Those of us against it really have no choice but to ride the wave and see what happens but I stand by my thoughts that overlays and dumbing down of intelligently designed attractions are nothing more than a diversion from the issue of lack of true ground breaking re-investments in pre-existing attractions.
Sorry to rant...at the end of the day we agree to disagree...
Sorry to rant...at the end of the day we agree to disagree...