Universal Orlando exec vows to go more eco-friendly

NemoRocks78

Seized
Original Poster
Universal Orlando exec vows to go more eco-friendly
Scott Powers | Sentinel Staff Writer
November 6, 2007

Universal Orlando jumped into the green theme-park movement Monday, a little behind Walt Disney World and SeaWorld Orlando, though Universal officials vowed to quickly become an industry leader.

As part of a larger initiative begun Sunday by corporate parents NBC Universal and General Electric Co., Universal Orlando pledged to leave what President Bill Davis called the "smallest environmental-impact footprint possible."

First up in the new "green is Universal" campaign: The resort has converted all mobile engines to run on either ethanol or biodeisel fuel.

Company officials also promised the resort will increase its recycling and energy-conservation efforts, move toward lower-toxicity cleaners and solvents, and explore the use of solar energy and almost any other environmentally friendly option that appears viable.

"We will focus on becoming the greenest resort possible," Davis said.

Many of the programs Universal highlighted Monday are not new to the company. For example, Universal has been recycling for years. But Davis said the urgency of the commitment is new.

The resort's pledge should not surprise many in the industry, because the green movement is catching on in tourism and among tourists. SeaWorld Orlando and its parent company, Busch Entertainment Corp., which also owns Busch Gardens Tampa Bay, have long declared that conservation is one of the basic themes of its parks. So has Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, at least for Disney's Animal Kingdom. And in recent months, Disney has accelerated its environmental efforts for everything from its hotels to its bus fleet, and it recently promoted two influential executives to newly created environmental jobs.

"Consumers want green tourism," said Ady Milman, theme-park business professor for the University of Central Florida's Rosen College of Hospitality Management.

Milman cited a recent online survey by the travel Web site Orbitz, which used MarketTools' Zoomerang panel of 320 adults who are regular travelers, to measure environmental interests.

"Over two-thirds of those polled placed importance on the eco-friendliness of a destination," Milman said.

Universal Orlando, which includes two theme parks, the CityWalk night-life and shopping district, and three major resort hotels, is recycling everything from restaurant cooking oils to cardboard. The resort also is replacing or updating items from chillers and hydraulic motors to lightbulbs with higher-efficiency alternatives. Like Disney and Busch, Universal also has given environmental and conservation programs a place in the corporate hierarchy, putting David Winslow, an engineering director, in charge of a new office of environmental sustainability.

Davis and Winslow said they intend to explore doing much more in the parks and with CityWalk businesses and the resort's affiliated hotels. Some things, they acknowledged, are bigger challenges. Theme parks are by nature high-energy operations, full of bright lights, fast and powerful rides, and tens of thousands of people who daily consume products and services and create waste.

"We're going to get as far as we can as fast as we can," Davis said. "Some things we're going to make great progress [with], and it's going to come very quickly -- low hanging fruit. Other things will take a little longer."

Other theme-park companies are not standing still. SeaWorld, for example, is about to introduce biodegradable food-service plates, containers, cups and flatware in its employee-dining areas -- then, if it works, in its restaurants. Disney is rapidly addressing waste, energy use and toxic-chemical use throughout its hotels and parks. On Monday, the giant resort announced that the state has designated two more Disney destinations, Disney's Wilderness Lodge and the Fort Wilderness Resort and Campground, as part of Florida's "Green Lodging" program. That puts at least 11 of Disney's 22 hotels and lodges in the program.

Winslow said many of the programs make sense financially. Higher-efficiency lights and motors have higher capital costs but bring quick returns in the form of lower operating costs. That's not necessarily true with alternative fuels yet, he said, but the cost is close enough that the environmental benefits make their use a "no contest" decision.

Consultant Dennis Speigel, president of Cincinnati-based International Theme Park Services, also noted that choosing the environmentally sound alternative "is not only good practice, it's good publicity."


Scott Powers can be reached at spowers@orlandosentinel.com or 407-420-5441.
 

Pumbas Nakasak

Heading for the great escape.
Well as a theme park is not vital in sustaining life perhaps this means he intends to close?

Im sick of this save the planet bollocks, I know its important but untill they can agree some common ground I dont want to be force fed someones opinion and debate stiffling retoric.

Ok Im calm
 

CBOMB

Active Member
Being green, and eco -friendly makes for good P.R., hardly anything other than that. If they want to be really eco-friendly close the park. Let it grow back wild, the gators could always use some more swamp land.. Less consumption of water, electricity, and all those other nasty man-made chemicals that you need to run a park. Now all of you nature first folks don't come in here, and start calling me names.
 

BSikor

Active Member
Universal has been green for some time now. They only operate their attractions at 50% to sell more of their Express Passes errr I mean save the planet. :brick:

Yeah right. It angers me to go there (I only go because my friend has an AP so I got one too, 2 years for price of one) When they are running only one side of the loading platform on the mummy to sell more passes by making the wait double as long (They say they aren't staffed yet I've seen one person load both sides so they are lying) One side on E.T. One train instead of 2 or 3 on the coasters. Its sickening. :mad:

Every corner you turn, they are trying to make a buck off you. Regular parking or Preferred? Preferred or Valet? ______!
 

Michael72688

New Member
Universal has been green for some time now. They only operate their attractions at 50% to sell more of their Express Passes errr I mean save the planet. :brick:

Yeah right. It angers me to go there (I only go because my friend has an AP so I got one too, 2 years for price of one) When they are running only one side of the loading platform on the mummy to sell more passes by making the wait double as long (They say they aren't staffed yet I've seen one person load both sides so they are lying) One side on E.T. One train instead of 2 or 3 on the coasters. Its sickening. :mad:

Every corner you turn, they are trying to make a buck off you. Regular parking or Preferred? Preferred or Valet? ______!

Ok first off, if you hate it that much dont go. Second, I work at Universal and can promise you then entire resort is extremely understaffed, especially in the not so fun to work areas like food. As for the Mummy, yes one person can load both platforms, however, you still need at least 2 extra people to operate that extra side.
 

Hakunamatata

Le Meh
Premium Member
Well as a theme park is not vital in sustaining life perhaps this means he intends to close?

Im sick of this save the planet bollocks, I know its important but untill they can agree some common ground I dont want to be force fed someones opinion and debate stiffling retoric.

Ok Im calm

Im right there with you. I still havent been able to get any of the dooms dayers to tell my how the last "ice age" came to an end without the assistance of my SUV.....
 

BSikor

Active Member
Ok first off, if you hate it that much dont go. Second, I work at Universal and can promise you then entire resort is extremely understaffed, especially in the not so fun to work areas like food. As for the Mummy, yes one person can load both platforms, however, you still need at least 2 extra people to operate that extra side.

Sorry to offend. I like Universal but it is very clear that they try to milk you for a couple extra bucks at every turn. I know they have to do this because they are competing with Disney. As for the Mummy, I didn't know. Its just the impression that the guests are given. I know someone who works in attraction for Universal and he informed me that Universal does things like that to increase its waits. How do you explain them running only one train on Dueling Dragons last week on a very slow day when the line should have been only about 10 minutes, it was over 45? Why do they send every other car out of the same loading platform in E.T. empty when the wait is 30 minutes? Yes, I know they are understaffed like most of the attractions in town but Universal does things to make their waits longer in hopes of selling more Express Passes.

I'm not doubting you, I'm just stating my observations and perceptions.
 

AndyP

Active Member
Sorry to offend. I like Universal but it is very clear that they try to milk you for a couple extra bucks at every turn. I know they have to do this because they are competing with Disney. As for the Mummy, I didn't know. Its just the impression that the guests are given. I know someone who works in attraction for Universal and he informed me that Universal does things like that to increase its waits. How do you explain them running only one train on Dueling Dragons last week on a very slow day when the line should have been only about 10 minutes, it was over 45? Why do they send every other car out of the same loading platform in E.T. empty when the wait is 30 minutes? Yes, I know they are understaffed like most of the attractions in town but Universal does things to make their waits longer in hopes of selling more Express Passes.

I'm not doubting you, I'm just stating my observations and perceptions.

Maybe it's less to do with Express Passes but due to it being slower season they run at less than full capacity to reduces costs. It makes sense, and I'm sure they don't continually run at 100% at Disney either by the way.

Plus if they did run everything at full capacity in the low seasons, customers would get round so quickly they would complain they weren't getting value for money, or go home early and spend less in the parks. And at the end of the day, it is a business.
 

Michael72688

New Member
Sorry to offend. I like Universal but it is very clear that they try to milk you for a couple extra bucks at every turn. I know they have to do this because they are competing with Disney. As for the Mummy, I didn't know. Its just the impression that the guests are given. I know someone who works in attraction for Universal and he informed me that Universal does things like that to increase its waits. How do you explain them running only one train on Dueling Dragons last week on a very slow day when the line should have been only about 10 minutes, it was over 45? Why do they send every other car out of the same loading platform in E.T. empty when the wait is 30 minutes? Yes, I know they are understaffed like most of the attractions in town but Universal does things to make their waits longer in hopes of selling more Express Passes.

I'm not doubting you, I'm just stating my observations and perceptions.

I will completely agree with the fact that Universal tries harder to get every penny out of every customer, much more so than Disney. The biggest reason for this are the attendance numbers, Disney can obviously pull in a lot more people this way they dont have to make as much money off of things like food and beverage or extra perks. Hopefully Universal will start to make some changes when it comes to the way they do things. I'm not going to lie Universal is by far my favorite resort in Orlando but they have a long way to go if they want to become real competition, it doesnt just revolve around the kind of rides or entertainment they offer and hopefully they realize this sooner rather than later.
 

BSikor

Active Member
Maybe it's less to do with Express Passes but due to it being slower season they run at less than full capacity to reduces costs. It makes sense, and I'm sure they don't continually run at 100% at Disney either by the way.

Plus if they did run everything at full capacity in the low seasons, customers would get round so quickly they would complain they weren't getting value for money, or go home early and spend less in the parks. And at the end of the day, it is a business.

Yes and no. When I worked giving tours on LWTL, yes, somedays we wouldn't have many boats on the canal because we didn't have people because it was going to be slow. But also it didn't create a false wait. As an annual passholder to both Disney and Universal I can go to MGM and ride RNR and walk on with no line and then stop and Universal with the same low guest count and wait 30 minutes to ride Dueling Dragons because they only have one train on each track. That's all I'm saying. I like Universal, they're not Disney, but I like it, I just don't like their practices.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom