Don’t forget Dr. Doom. The park is loaded with exciting and well-themed attractions-many for a mature audience which makes it so popular.
It has 5 lands. The huge coaster is it's own "land". If you didn't want to look at the coaster as being a land, then you could consider it part of the hub and call that a land as it's more than just a *normal* hub (It has a carousel, after all).I'm also hoping this park doesn't open with just 4 lands. I understand wanting to have space left for expansion, but that is overdoing it. A new park should still have 5 lands minimum. Hopefully they just excluded some big things from the concept art because the details are not set in stone yet.
That was a very different era. Without the Internet, people couldn’t obsess over press conference and try to discover details that weren’t revealed.The press conference is basically the equivalent of
View attachment 395366
Which had about the same level of detail as this one did. In short, officially remove the veil of secrecy to move along government entities a bit better (streamlining permitting and road/general infrastructure). It wasn't really about announcing details to vacationers. I'd expect a permit storm very shortly (if it hasn't already and just hasn't filtered out to permitting sites yet)
I don’t really think it is picking. I was just agreeing it is a stupid name. Epic is such an overused word.
Edited: darn double negative haha.
It’s no doubt good for Orlando as a whole. Competition, more jobs, a totally new park, but the overall park design choice seems lackluster. What you and other in this niche Universal subForum fácil to understand is that it’s fair to be both happy for something and criticize aspects. This park is no DisneySea, EPCOT Center, Animal Kingdom, or even castle style parks. Besides the Monsters World—which I am ecstatic about, it feels less continuous than IOA in terms of IP-lands.
It’s no doubt good for Orlando as a whole. Competition, more jobs, a totally new park, but the overall park design choice seems lackluster. What you and other in this niche Universal subForum fácil to understand is that it’s fair to be both happy for something and criticize aspects. This park is no DisneySea, EPCOT Center, Animal Kingdom, or even castle style parks. Besides the Monsters World—which I am ecstatic about, it feels less continuous than IOA in terms of IP-lands.
They could have integrated the hotel into a land ala DisneySea, perhaps into Monsters World. The land could be a gritty version of London, transition to sorcery (Fantastic Beasts), and then to Dragons. On top of that, like the MK which is easier to do than say a DisneySea (where the park transports you to various ports of calls) or EPCOT (where you are literally visiting the world’s fair) the lands can feel less connected while aesthetically flowing into each other.
I think pulling a Shanghai Disneyland would have worked best for this park. Instead of dead ending each land, they could flow into each other. In addition, a large hub like Epic Worlds will have (or improved, Shanghai) could make the park feel more like you are visiting the park EPCOT style.
I however still think this will still be a fun park to visit, but there are significantly better design choices that could be done for the same money. I just feel that as a Universal fan we can demand the best.
Heck, even the disjointed mess that both Hollywood Studios and Universal Studios have at minimum the Hollywood aspect ‘kinda’ connecting them together. And Hollywood Boulevard flows so well into Sunset and then the Tower of Terror as a magical weenie. That level of storytelling continues through the ride. The icon of this park is going to be what? A nice but unthemed looking hotel? Guess they’re pulling an IOA.
On that note, IOA has a proper act opening to the park, and a generic lake tied the lands together in a more logical fashion. I’m really not digging this new park’s dead end style. It’s like you are visiting for the IP and for for the theme park itself. It just seems off.
Frankly, Nintendo is one of two IPs which I think can anchor an entire park, and it could even be done DisneySea style with all the lands flowing into each other and transporting you there; it is also difficult to relate Nintendo to other themes.
What Universal fails to realize at the moment is that it doesn’t matter about the IP, it matters about the theming, quality of rides, service, food, and the connection the storytelling makes to the guest. Nobody cares about Avatar, yet it’s almost a Potter-level success. You give people a good product, they will come, and not all IP integration is the same.
See Above^^
I wouldn’t count Dudley Do Right Dueling Dragons, as E-tickets. Even Hulk is a stretch since I can go to my local Six Flags and have more of the same. Though the trifecta of Spider-Man, Forbidden Journey, and Kong are quite strong. Hagrid is a good ride, but sparsely themed for an E-ticket of today’s standards.
It’s no doubt good for Orlando as a whole. Competition, more jobs, a totally new park, but the overall park design choice seems lackluster. What you and other in this niche Universal subForum fácil to understand is that it’s fair to be both happy for something and criticize aspects. This park is no DisneySea, EPCOT Center, Animal Kingdom, or even castle style parks. Besides the Monsters World—which I am ecstatic about, it feels less continuous than IOA in terms of IP-lands.
They could have integrated the hotel into a land ala DisneySea, perhaps into Monsters World. The land could be a gritty version of London, transition to sorcery (Fantastic Beasts), and then to Dragons. On top of that, like the MK which is easier to do than say a DisneySea (where the park transports you to various ports of calls) or EPCOT (where you are literally visiting the world’s fair) the lands can feel less connected while aesthetically flowing into each other.
I think pulling a Shanghai Disneyland would have worked best for this park. Instead of dead ending each land, they could flow into each other. In addition, a large hub like Epic Worlds will have (or improved, Shanghai) could make the park feel more like you are visiting the park EPCOT style.
I however still think this will still be a fun park to visit, but there are significantly better design choices that could be done for the same money. I just feel that as a Universal fan we can demand the best.
Heck, even the disjointed mess that both Hollywood Studios and Universal Studios have at minimum the Hollywood aspect ‘kinda’ connecting them together. And Hollywood Boulevard flows so well into Sunset and then the Tower of Terror as a magical weenie. That level of storytelling continues through the ride. The icon of this park is going to be what? A nice but unthemed looking hotel? Guess they’re pulling an IOA.
On that note, IOA has a proper act opening to the park, and a generic lake tied the lands together in a more logical fashion. I’m really not digging this new park’s dead end style. It’s like you are visiting for the IP and for for the theme park itself. It just seems off.
Frankly, Nintendo is one of two IPs which I think can anchor an entire park, and it could even be done DisneySea style with all the lands flowing into each other and transporting you there; it is also difficult to relate Nintendo to other themes.
What Universal fails to realize at the moment is that it doesn’t matter about the IP, it matters about the theming, quality of rides, service, food, and the connection the storytelling makes to the guest. Nobody cares about Avatar, yet it’s almost a Potter-level success. You give people a good product, they will come, and not all IP integration is the same.
See Above^^
I wouldn’t count Dudley Do Right Dueling Dragons, as E-tickets. Even Hulk is a stretch since I can go to my local Six Flags and have more of the same. Though the trifecta of Spider-Man, Forbidden Journey, and Kong are quite strong. Hagrid is a good ride, but sparsely themed for an E-ticket of today’s standards.
It’s pretty clear that the hotel is connected to the hub which has an overall steampunk/discovery theme...
And while IOA is a great park, its layout is not one of its strong suits imo. It’s just a giant circle, which makes it impossible to go from FJ to Hulk, JPRA to Seuss, etc without walking at least half of the park. Not to mention the lagoon which just sits there unused. I much prefer this hub and spoke layout.
In 1999 when IoA opened I would definitely say that a Duelling inverted coaster (Dragons) would count as a flagship attraction at any theme park, Hulk as well. Just because you can get almost as good doesn’t mean they aren’t E ticket, they would be E at Six Flags too.
Also if Dudley Do-Right isn’t and E then Splash isn’t either.
Frankly, Nintendo is one of two IPs which I think can anchor an entire park, and it could even be done DisneySea style with all the lands flowing into each other and transporting you there; it is also difficult to relate Nintendo to other themes.
The giant circle is my biggest pet peeve about IOA. It's the same pet peeve I have about Epcot, but at least boat transport is available part of the day.
Interesting tweet
Does that mean potentially they will have Jurrasic World/Park over two parks?
Interesting tweet
Does that mean potentially they will have Jurrasic World/Park over two parks?
It hasn't been announced yet but you can see them clearing land and putting in pilingsHadn't realised that a Jurrasic coaster was going into IOA, my bad!
This has the potential to knock everyone's socks offThe hub/spine is celestial/space themed and the hotel is part of that theme. The hub/spine is also considered it's own land and will have several attractions that reinforce the theme. Like the carousel may be astrology/constellation themed and the dueling coaster rocket themed. The hub/spine is your Celestial Highway that you travel on to get to all these fantastic worlds.
The park will open with more than 9 attractions. Berk alone has a dark ride, a family coaster, a Mack Splash Battle, and duel Sky Flyers. Nintendo has Mario Kart, Yoshi, and Donkey Kong. Monsters is rumored to have a Kuka based dark ride, a walk-thru, and a large scale stage show. And Fantastic Beasts is rumored to have a Ministry of Magic dark ride and second attraction. Along with the carousel and coaster in the hub. I am sure that there are a couple that I missed. Like speculation that the Space Fantasy coaster from Osaka may be included in the hub.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.