I'm standing by my statement. To me, it is painfully clear. Others may have a hard time seeing it, and that's okay. I totally respect whatever way you want to see it. If you're trying to understand why I see it as a train to nowhere, see my second message in this thread about the NYC subway. I think I made my point of view much clearer in the example I used.
The TTC isn't entirely "nowhere", as there is a refreshment stand there, restrooms, a small gift shop, and you can walk to the Polynessian from there. If the Poly wasn't witnin walking distance, it would be a total destination of nowhere!
"But where would MK guests park?"
The would park at the new structures built at the EC parking lot. By the way, the EC monorail station would be directly connected to the new parking structure. From there, guests would take the monorail directly to the MK, bypassing the TTC, but they could still park at the TTC, if they want to. They might want to because that area would become somewhere, a new development of hotels circled around what used to be the MK parking lot. These hotels would have their own parking structure connected to what used to be the TTC. The additional at EC also comes in handy because, we're pulling all the parking out from DHS, as well. From Central Parking (the former EC parking lot), you can walk to EC, take a monorail directly to the MK, or take an expansion spur to DHS. The former DHS parking lot would give that park new room to grow. AK connections would require a bit more planning, so everything stays as is for now.
