News Disney Lakeshore Lodge (Project 89 - Development near Fort Wilderness)

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
The only resort buildings that could arguably need work to that extent are the two they don't have problems filling up - Poly and Contemporary. Elsewhere, the concrete construction of all the expansion resorts is easy to maintain and will last many more decades.
It’s more the other way around. The original modular steel system of the Contemporary and Polynesian provides a consistency, uniformity and adaptability not found in the subsequent resort buildings.
 

PREMiERdrum

Well-Known Member
It’s more the other way around. The original modular steel system of the Contemporary and Polynesian provides a consistency, uniformity and adaptability not found in the subsequent resort buildings.
Adaptability for sure, but there are issues with both complexes that thus far have only partially been dealt with. Regardless, they have lots and lots of life left.
 

mattpeto

Well-Known Member
I’d be really shocked if the 60B doesn’t include plans on a logistics enhancement at WDW. The skyliner has been a massive hit, and has improved the guest experience of 1 moderate and 2 values, and more importantly allowed Disney to charge more per night.

A new DVC project can partially fund this logistical improvement, like it did with the Riveria. If MK adds a 2nd entrance, a skyliner station from Reflections makes some sense. But not sure what else they would connect on that side, and probably will just stick with an added boat launch.

Still with the investment mostly focused on AK in the near term, this is the time to add a station that connects AKL, Coronado and AK finally. They could add All Stars and BB too on that hub.

They just need a new DVC out that way to help fund it.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
Surprised they keep wanting to build new resorts when it’s hard to fill what they have now and the “value” of DVC isn’t what it used to be

We’re still going to need 2-3 more Riviera’s, or 3-5 more Poly Towers or 6-8 more Grand Floridian wing conversions before the DVC train hits the end of the line.

There is an end point though! Maybe 2038/39 is the last ‘new’ DVC product.
 

Kittlesona

Active Member
They can’t. People have bought a deeded interest in a specific resort. There are Florida timeshare laws that they have to follow.

Now when the 2042 resorts expire they can do what they want with them.
This is an interesting point that I’m surprised there isn’t more speculation about. Right now those 2042 resorts are essentially “guaranteed” to be “sold-out.” What the heck are they going to do this all this excess inventory in 2042 when they currently have large sections of various resorts mothballed?
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
This is an interesting point that I’m surprised there isn’t more speculation about. Right now those 2042 resorts are essentially “guaranteed” to be “sold-out.” What the heck are they going to do this all this excess inventory in 2042 when they currently have large sections of various resorts mothballed?

Old Key West will be mostly shifted to 2057. There’s lot of estates they are now acquiring.

I assume Vero and Hilton head will be divested. Boulder Ridge is quite small and Beach Club/Boardwalk are quite desirable. They’ll have a lot of points, but plenty of time to sell them.

Where they’ve screwed themselves is later on. Saratoga heading directly into Animal Kingdom Lodge AND Old Key West 3 years later. None of those resorts move cash rates well at that level of volume.
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
Old Key West will be mostly shifted to 2057. There’s lot of estates they are now acquiring.

I assume Vero and Hilton head will be divested. Boulder Ridge is quite small and Beach Club/Boardwalk are quite desirable. They’ll have a lot of points, but plenty of time to sell them.

Where they’ve screwed themselves is later on. Saratoga heading directly into Animal Kingdom Lodge AND Old Key West 3 years later. None of those resorts move cash rates well at that level of volume.
Could Saratoga / OKW be razed/repurposed to a Golden Oak type development?
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
This is an interesting point that I’m surprised there isn’t more speculation about. Right now those 2042 resorts are essentially “guaranteed” to be “sold-out.” What the heck are they going to do this all this excess inventory in 2042 when they currently have large sections of various resorts mothballed?
I took a look at the way Disney factors in available rooms. It’s not clear, but the annual reports quantifies “available room nights (in the thousands).” These reports also caveat that this does not include rooms utilized by DVC members.

So, what happens when all those contracts expire? Does the room inventory revert back to Disney resorts?
 

CastAStone

5th gate? Just build a new resort Bob.
Old Key West will be mostly shifted to 2057. There’s lot of estates they are now acquiring.

I assume Vero and Hilton head will be divested. Boulder Ridge is quite small and Beach Club/Boardwalk are quite desirable. They’ll have a lot of points, but plenty of time to sell them.

Where they’ve screwed themselves is later on. Saratoga heading directly into Animal Kingdom Lodge AND Old Key West 3 years later. None of those resorts move cash rates well at that level of volume.
Bingo. OKW will be 65 years old though and will likely meet my friend Mr Bulldozer.

If SSR was expiring today, I think they’d bulldoze it too and create an integrated DVC into a new area of Disney Springs, kinda how GCH is more or less integrated into DTD. But will major retail destinations still exist in 2054? 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

I also think they’ll bulldoze BW and build something new there; it will buy time as they sell BCV2 and BRV2, but also it will allow them to build a property that actually makes coherent sense, has indoor accessible dining, and is optimized for its absolutely prime location between DHS and Epcot (with significantly bigger rooms, for example).

We’ll see, but no one and I mean no one would build BW today the way it’s laid out, it violates like every principle of good design.
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
Shhhhhhh!

Some of us enjoy being on the monorail and paying only paying AKL/WL prices.
My family watching you from one of the towers:
1715470869394.jpeg
 

Sectorkeeper71

Well-Known Member
It’s possible?…len would have a better opinion.

My thought is what the complete mishandling of APs (more on that later) has done is reduce the frequency of repeat visits by their core clientele in more damaging fashion

I know DVCs that now burn points on room sizes they don’t need for less trips.

Or go for 5-7 days and get 2 or 3 days of tickets.
this is exactly what my parents do now. Growing up, it was economical to be able to get APs for the family and then get two trips in one year span on those passes. Now? Forget it.

They go for 4-5 days now vs 6-7. 3 or 4 park days vs 6 or 7 back in the day.

Hell, on my honeymoon which was on my parents gifted points, the wife and I did 4 park days out of a total of 8 spent there.
 

Unbanshee

Well-Known Member
@sndral brought to our attention that the addresses in the recent Balfour Beatty permit are a match for a permit that they filed in 2019 which we are pretty sure was for the Reflections project.

Is it possible that it was misinterpreted in 2019? The list reads more like a series of cabins than a new hotel structure

Edit: I forgot that there was a cabin element to that project. Carry on
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom