'Pooh' suit put under further review

mkt

When a paradise is lost go straight to Disney™
Premium Member
Original Poster
'Pooh' suit put under further review
By Russ Britt
5:15 PM ET Oct. 19, 2002

LOS ANGELES (CBS Marketwatch) -- A second accounting team is expected to be appointed within days on a case in which Walt Disney Co. is accused of withholding millions of dollars in royalties over the cartoon character Winnie The Pooh.


Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Ernest Hiroshige on Friday set aside his June order that would have forced Disney to fork over $200 million in royalties.

Stephen Slesinger Inc., which owns a portion of the rights to the honey-loving character, had called for a second, independent review of the case. Hiroshige had determined the first accountant, Gursey, Schneider & Co. of Los Angeles, conducted a biased review of the case.

Gursey, Schneider had determined that Disney owed Slesinger only a few thousand dollars.

"It was an outrageous result," said Bonnie Eskenazi, an attorney for Slesinger. She said Disney convinced the accountants to simply not factor in data for which there was no record. These records were destroyed by the company, Eskenazi said.

Daniel Petrocelli, Disney's attorney, could not be reached for comment, nor could the company. But Petrocelli told Reuters the company expected to prevail in the case.

In June, Hiroshige, developed a formula that would have forced Disney to pay $200 million. At that time, the judge called for a new accountant to review the case.

Certain rights to Pooh were sold by author A.A. Milne to Slesinger in 1930. In 1961, the Milne and Slesinger families reached an agreement with Disney that gave the entertainment company licensing rights.

Eskenazi said that in 1983 those rights were renegotiated, as the Slesinger family called for the company to stop commingling royalty allotments for Pooh with Disney's own characters such as Mickey Mouse. She said the company then would give a disproportionate amount to its own characters, thus shortchanging Pooh.

"Even though they promised in that agreement to stop doing it, they kept doing it," Eskenazi said.

Disney bought out the Milne family's rights for Pooh two years ago for $350 million, Eskenazi said.

Over the years, Disney has produced three Pooh feature films, an animated television series and markets children's merchandise featuring the characters created by Milne.

A key task of the new accounting review will be to determine the amount of royalties based on those sales.
 

pheneix

Well-Known Member
Let's see, after paying off the original investigators does anyone think Disney even has a chance of this judge ruling in favor of them? Dsney should have just gave the poor saps their money and moved on.
 

tenchu

Well-Known Member
On a slightly different subject, does anyone know what royalties Disney pay the use of the Peter Pan characters?

I believe the rights are legally owned by a childrens hospital in London.
 

tenchu

Well-Known Member
This was in the news a while ago.

A classic tale
By MOLLY GLENTZER
Copyright 2002 Houston Chronicle


The boy who refused to grow up turns 100 this year. Author J.M. Barrie introduced Peter Pan in his 1902 book, The Little White Bird. Although Peter didn't show up until Chapter 14, he obviously made an impression.

Barrie quickly expanded the familiar tale in which Wendy, Michael and John accompany Peter to a Neverland teeming with American Indians, pirates, fairies and mermaids before coming home to grow up.

The full story first appeared as a play in 1904. It made Barrie so rich, he donated his Peter Pan rights to London's Great Ormond Street Hospital for Sick Children.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom