Pixar profit soars on home video revenue

cherrynegra

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Pixar profit soars on home video revenue

GARY GENTILE, AP Business Writer

Thursday, November 11, 2004

Pixar Animation Studios reported higher third quarter earnings Thursday on home video sales of its five animated films, most notably last year's hit "Finding Nemo."

Pixar, the maker of "Monsters, Inc." and "Toy Story," reported net income of $22.4 million, or 38 cents per share for the quarter ended Oct. 2, compared with $13.2 million, or 23 cents per share in the same period last year.

The results beat the estimates of analysts surveyed by Thomson First Call, who had expected earnings of 24 cents per share.

Revenue rose to $44.5 million, compared with $30.2 million in the same period last year.

Pixar, based in Emeryville, Calif., released its sixth feature film, "The Incredibles," earlier this month. The movie earned $70.3 million in its opening weekend. Results from that film were not included in the third quarter.

"Pixar is now six for six and we are hard at work on 'Cars,' our studio's seventh feature film," Pixar chief executive Steve Jobs said in a statement.

The company said that, based on expected theatrical revenue from "The Incredibles," it expects its full year profit to be in a range from $2.10 per share to $2.20 per share.

Jobs also took a shot at this weekend's main competition, "The Polar Express," a computer animated tale from Warner Bros. Preliminary estimates show the movie earned $2.6 million on Wednesday, its opening day in theaters, compared to about $4.6 million for "The Incredibles," which is in its second week.

"Fortunately, 'The Incredibles' derailed 'The Polar Express' its first day out of the station," Jobs said in a conference call with analysts.

Pixar's next film, "Cars" will be released by The Walt Disney Co. next year. It is the last film under a contract between the two companies. Pixar has been talking to other film distribution companies about a new deal that would have Pixar finance and own its films and pay a studio a set distribution fee.

Now, Disney covers half the financing for each Pixar film and keeps 50 percent of the profits, plus a distribution fee.

Jobs said the company is not in serious negotiations for a new deal with any studio and is waiting, in part, until Disney names a new chief executive to replace Michael Eisner, who is retiring in 2006. Disney's board has said it expects to name Eisner's successor by June.

"As observers, it looks like Disney seeking a new CEO could have several outcomes, one of which is musical chairs among the other studios," Jobs said. "So who knows where people are going to end up?"

Jobs said Pixar does not need to have a new deal in place until next year.

He also said Pixar is considering releasing its films in the summer rather than the holidays, a move that would mean an 18-month release delay to make the change. Pixar now releases one film each year.

Summer movies seem to make more money, Jobs said, and it is better to release home video for the holidays -- after a summer theatrical run -- than to follow a holiday release with home video in the spring.

For the first nine months of the year, Pixar reported net income of $86.5 million, or $1.46 per share, compared with $40.9 million, or 72 cents per share in the same period last year.

Revenue for the first nine months was $164.6 million, compared with $97.7 million in the same period last year.

Shares of Pixar rose $2.68 to $79.94 at the end of regular trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market. They gained another 3.8 percent, or $3.06, in the extended trading session.
 

Indy95

New Member
Jobs really seems to know where his company's going, and he put his mouth where his money was. I mean, who's to argue with him when you've doubled a competitor's earnings for Wed., even though "Incredibles" has been out a week longer? This is the kind of man we want running the WALT Disney Company!!
 

disneymoc

Active Member
This may seem odd, but I have always wondered why Pixar hasn't released a video comprising some of their best shorts. This would be something they can call their own and not worry about having the Disney name plastered all over it.

What do you guys think?
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom