We now have dedicated board for Star Wars: Galactic Starcruiser info, tips, reviews and questions. Go to the Star Wars: Galactic Starcruiser board
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.You can use your Twitter or Facebook account to sign up, or register directly.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="colliera" data-source="post: 540269" data-attributes="member: 5096">Market MaturityWhile CG productions of some sort have been around since the time of TRON fully CG features as produced by Pixar are still evolving and the entire CG market is in a fast growth period and will be for a few more years before it levels out. Pixar is without a distribution channel but having to give up 67% of the profit is still too high. Granted Disney shared the production costs and provided the distribution but as Disney always has done with it's creative talent their contribution's worth amounted to nothing. Oh the corporate Disney likes to market how creative and magical they are and charge the high dollar for it but actual compensation to the talent has historically been poor.While Walt lost his creative product (Oswald the Rabit) to his distribution channel at least Jobs sees it for what it's worth. Walt built his own distribution channel with Buena Vista. Jobs has already been down that road with Apple.Should he create his own new distribution channel? Not when a new deal would get him one alreadly in place. Warner is just part of the puzzle. Time Warner HBO is what he would really have at his disposal. If it becomes Sony then its Sony Columbia.  Fox while perhaps the weaker of the three and willing to give up more to Jobs is also News Corporation. All three are multi-nationals that a reach beyond plush toys.What business is/should Pixar be in? If it's what the parks became under Pressler/Harris then maybe he should be talking to the Gap.</blockquote>

Verification