ISTCNavigator57 said:Yes, Disney is in talks with the AZA to get pandas for the Expedition: EVEREST area starting fall of 2005--it takes a long time for the AZA to approve such placements, especially when the zoological facility in question would like breeding pairs. I hope they get them...they could make them visible both to guests walking around Asia and guests in line for Everest![]()
ISTCNavigator57 said:Yes, Disney is in talks with the AZA to get pandas for the Expedition: EVEREST area starting fall of 2005--it takes a long time for the AZA to approve such placements, especially when the zoological facility in question would like breeding pairs. I hope they get them...they could make them visible both to guests walking around Asia and guests in line for Everest![]()
ISTCNavigator57 said:All zoological facilities need special approval from the AZA to get breeding pairs, as they are selected in a way to best promote genetic variation among the endangered species in question. It would also look very bad if Animal Kingdom went against the AZA and lost their accreditation...I could see the animal rights people jumping on something like that...
speck76 said:Going against the AZA and losing accreditation are two very different things.
speck76 said:Sure, but it is not automatic.
Since most zoos are public owned, and do not have the money riding on them like DAK does, I am sure at some point, DAK will have to do what is best for business. Let's say the AZA does not approve a certain animal or exhibit for DAK, but it makes good business sense for DAK to have such an exhibit or animal.....what is going to win out in the long run...money or pleasing the AZA?
xfkirsten said:Unfortunately, I have to agree with you there. Disney can still make money without the AZA's seal of approval. But IMHO, if the AZA takes accreditation away from a zoo, there is something SERIOUSLY wrong with their animal care. I personally would not return to DAK if that were to happen, and would be very vocal about that. Unfortunately, I know all too well how much of the public could care less if there was conditions that bad. The Miami Seaquarium is proof of that.![]()
-Kirsten
speck76 said:Oh, I am not talking about losing accreditation because of bad animal care....Disney could never let that happen...PR nightmare. The discussion was about getting AZA's approval for a breeding pair of Pandas. Disney has exhibits that seem to be much larger than most zoos, and from what I have read, AZA's rules for enclosure size are not very good, and out of date.
Disney may need to aquire animals without getting approval from the AZA...that is what I was talking about.
![]()
NSCMC said:I actually learned recently (from a Final Jeopardy question of all things) that China determines where pandas get to live. They have final approval of what zoos (or nahtazus) will get to have pandas. Of course Jeopardy could be wrong...but it makes sense. I think until the panda breeding programs outside of China take off, the only real source for pandas will be China itself. Again - consider the source - and that all my info comes from a foggy memory of what Alex Trebek said a few weeks ago
But I agree that having pandas at AK would be great.
NSCMC said:I actually learned recently (from a Final Jeopardy question of all things) that China determines where pandas get to live. They have final approval of what zoos (or nahtazus) will get to have pandas. Of course Jeopardy could be wrong...but it makes sense. I think until the panda breeding programs outside of China take off, the only real source for pandas will be China itself. Again - consider the source - and that all my info comes from a foggy memory of what Alex Trebek said a few weeks ago
But I agree that having pandas at AK would be great.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.