More Disney Acquisitions?

jrriddle

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Maybe the Muppets were only the first step.

Merrill Lynch: Is another Disney bidder on the horizon?

The siege of the Magic Kingdom may not be over yet.

Merrill Lynch, the New York brokerage house, has issued a research report suggesting multiple scenarios in which the Walt Disney Co.could be acquired by Comcast Corp., or enter a three-way deal involving Liberty Media and Interactive Corp. -- or do some acquiring of its own, in an effort to become less attractive to unwanted suitors.

That's the strategy employed by Disney in 1984, when Saul Steinberg launched a hostile takeover bid for Disney. Disney subsequently acquired Arvida, the sprawling land and development company.

Disney has rejected the Comcast bid. And Comcast has backed away from offering more than the roughly 9 percent premium its own bid would bring Disney shareholders.

Merrill Lynch suggests that if Comcast continues to stand firm on its bid price, another bid for Disney will be forthcoming. Merrill casts doubt that media giants Time Warner or Viacom would be interested, but says one possible deal could involve Liberty Media, John Malone's high-powered cable concern turned holding company, and Interactive Corp., a media firm in which Liberty has an equity interest.

In yet another scenario, Merrill considers the likelihood that Disney will launch a preemptive strike, buying a company of its own. Among those speculated to be viable candidates: Yahoo!, Pixar and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.
 

JBSLJames

New Member
Originally posted by jrriddle
MGM and Pixar make sense, but Yahoo?

Sure. That is basically what goofy says many times in every movie he is in. . . YAHOO.

I still look for Disney to buy MGM. It would be nice if they waited until MGM bought Pixar...
 

xfkirsten

New Member
I suppose Yahoo makes sense to me, in a way. It's like the deal with the Go Network. Once Disney has control of it, they can integrate it as part of their online media.

-Kirsten
 

jrriddle

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Originally posted by xfkirsten
I suppose Yahoo makes sense to me, in a way. It's like the deal with the Go Network. Once Disney has control of it, they can integrate it as part of their online media.

-Kirsten

But wasn't the Go purchase a huge fiasco?
(love that word...fiasco...)
 

jrriddle

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
So I did a little digging around.
Apparently any MGM movies prior to 1986 belong to Warners.
Kinda takes a bit of the luster off of aquiring MGM.
BTW does that mean for The Disney/MGM theme park Disney pays royalties to Warner Bros not MGM for the use of the characters?
 

lebernadin

New Member
Yahoo makes sense, its one of the largest portals on the web and would fit in well marketing/integrating ABC.com, disney.com and especially espn.com
 

TURKEY

New Member
Yahoo makes sense. The CEO of Yahoo is already being mentioned as a replacement for Eisner.

If Disney aquires Yahoo, let Eisner stay on for the year or two left of his contract to groom the Yahoo CEO to be the CEO of Disney.
 

Woody13

New Member
Originally posted by turkey leg boy
If Disney aquires Yahoo, let Eisner stay on for the year or two left of his contract to groom the Yahoo CEO to be the CEO of Disney.

Sounds like a good plan to me.
 

jrriddle

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
What does everyone think of a Pixar takeover by Disney?
It seems far fetched but I would have said the same about the Muppets a week ago.
Besides, it could be Eisner's last chance to stick it to Jobs.
 

wdwmaniac

Member
Yahoo makes no sense. Since the cost is high and why would Disney want to get into a market against Microsoft. It makes more sense to make alliances.

PIXAR and MGM buyout at once I think would make sense and I think Disney would be able to offer TW for the 1986 Movies since TW is in debt.
 

jrriddle

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Originally posted by wdwmaniac
PIXAR and MGM buyout at once I think would make sense and I think Disney would be able to offer TW for the 1986 Movies since TW is in debt.

It would be a good move if they did make an offer to Warner's.
Maybe even better than buyng MGM. Get the library, skip the name.
 

wdwmaniac

Member
Originally posted by jrriddle
It would be a good move if they did make an offer to Warner's.
Maybe even better than buyng MGM. Get the library, skip the name.

I think MGM is like Disney you just can't buy one part you should keep the whole company together. MGM is a famous name like the Wizard of OZ and Gone with the Wind with a litte help like they are planning with the Muppets Disney could turn them around and bring back the MGM name to it's good old days. Maybe the best would be MGM and Miramax together. MGM got the name and Miramaxs seems to make the nomianted movies (except this year).
 

wdwmaniac

Member
as another way of getting Warner to sell the rights of MGM's movie would be using the Hobbit rights. Since UA owns Disturb. rights to this mult. million film a deal would be great for both sides.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom