Seems to good to be true to me
I guarantee you DHS will be the next park to see new things (and probably quite a few) followed by Epcot. Inside info? No...but everything points that way.I think a lot of people's non reaction or meh reactions stem from being disappointed so long in really nothing new. And it also seems that it stems from things being taken away and less being added.
They also take forever to do anything and knowing why (to stretch out the cost) makes it somewhat annoying and takes a little bit of the excitement out of things. Such as knowing Avatarland is coming since 2011 and won't be in the parks until 2017. I can understand being meh about that.
I do think they're trying. I see a lot of improvements, some refurbs are better than others, some of their 'entertainment' offerings could be better.
And also, a lot of the updates they did in the early 2000s were just very meh and unexciting as a whole. Stitch? Nemo? Figment? All somewhat blah attractions.
I do give them credit where credit is due. Festival of Fantasy is a major step up from their parades. But then you have parades in the other parks cut. It's like nothing can be added without taking something away. So I get the lackluster reactions. I do think focusing so much on what's taken away lessens the excitement for anything new.
And plus everyone has different tastes. So some updates and refurbs, people just aren't going to like them.
I think Rivers of Light is a huge step in the right direction for Animal Kingdom.
And once I see them saying we'll see updates and new rides for Epcot and DHS, I'd say many will see that as a step in the right direction.
I see a lot of negativity towards the hub re-do at the MK, and I'm all for preserving certain aspects of the parks, but honestly, it sounds like a huge step in the right direction. More fountains, more trees, more flowers, more walkways. I know losing some water around the hub and castle isn't very popular, but I think the MK deserves a large, expansive, impressive hub.
All that aside, can Disney PLEASE invest in Epcot and DHS! And can they please stop stretching every project out for years on end?
With every thing that Universal is doing I hope so!
All they would have to do to gain more of my attention is to spend less time/money on the resorts, espeically DVC. I know work is being done in the parks but not enough for my liking.
They're not; what is bad is when they put money into DVC that could be spent on something else, ie: more rides, when they already have plenty of properties.Why the dislike for DVC? I can see no harm is does, it brings revenue to WDW which is a good thing IMO.
What as I missing?
They're not; what is bad is when they put money into DVC that could be spent on something else, ie: more rides, when they already have plenty of properties.
This. Plus, they could knock out a DVC in no time, but drag their feet on attractions.They're not; what is bad is when they put money into DVC that could be spent on something else, ie: more rides, when they already have plenty of properties.
Is there reference material that spurred this post or is it just rhetorical?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.