Honestly I despite Pirates of the Caribbean and wouldnt be upset it it was bulldozed tonight. I want discounts on booze, $10 preferred parking, actual passholder gifts that are not cheaply made plastic magnets, the passholder room discount is joke. A value for still at least $105?? Ridicoulous. Also where is the passholder lounge at WDW? Oh right nowhere because they do not care!!!!!! I'll admit I'm just "over" disney for moment. There is truly nothing that interests me personally that I can get excited for. Some stupid land based on an overrated and not that good movie franchise at Studios doesn't cut it
Remember though everything is very personal.Honestly I despite Pirates of the Caribbean and wouldnt be upset it it was bulldozed tonight. I want discounts on booze, $10 preferred parking, actual passholder gifts that are not cheaply made plastic magnets, the passholder room discount is joke. A value for still at least $105?? Ridicoulous. Also where is the passholder lounge at WDW? Oh right nowhere because they do not care!!!!!! I'll admit I'm just "over" disney for moment. There is truly nothing that interests me personally that I can get excited for. Some stupid land based on an overrated and not that good movie franchise at Studios doesn't cut it
Yah clearly what I said in my post if you could read
it's all personal. I find nothing of interest right now and that's okay. I've been going every year for 10 years so a break is fine. Next year when Runaway Railway, Rat, and IllumiNations 2.0 opens, I'll ne excited again. Until then I'll be a gold AP
Disney or any company that has repeat customer can find themselves caught between a rock and a hard place. Every one wants the things that benefit them. I travel with seniors so preferred parking makes my life easier.Yah clearly what I said in my post if you could read
Because its boring, in my opinion of course
It goes beyond that. A scant few movies transcend, but most movies (even animation) are invariably grounded in the time that they are produced. As such, they become dated.
No I'm not; that's not even a small part of what I wrote; you're just making up nonsense to post in an attempt to make it seem like you have a point when all you really want to do is to distract attention away from points you don't like but for which you don't have a legitimate response.
Far far less so than your replies to those comments you don't like. You're reckless and aimless in that regard.
Me liking them has nothing to do with it. They were not examples of what we were talking about. Again, what we were talking about was you having demonstrated over and over that you are utterly unwilling to see past your own personal preferences to what could be a broader reality that justifies not doing what you personally want done.
Fair enough, but I wonder if you are able to hold to that.
Why would you even think that anyone would care one bit about your suggestions about what they should post about? That seems like yet another desperate attempt by you to control the discussion so you don't have to encounter comments you don't like but for which you have no legitimate response. So let's turn it around... why don't you take your own advice? Just post that you like things and don't like things and leave the "economist routine" to those of us with knowledge, experience and most importantly, a broad and mature perspective about business.
How do you account for the 30+ years of online posts within which I have regularly and consistently put self-centered curmudgeons in their place whenever they seek to put their own personal preferences over the professional expertise, experience, knowledge and access to research data that some business' managers - any business' managers - have? My point is as it has always been - that it is fine to say what one personally likes or does not like, but when people start inflating the importance of their preferences into some kind of conclusion about the decisions made by a business then they're being ridiculously egoistic, irrational and childish.
It isn't, and this highlights another aspect of this: Anthropomorphizing businesses is another indicator of what I've been talking about, and another reflection of being unable to cogently differentiate between one's preferences (likes and dislikes) and the broader reality of the commercial transactions between themselves and the businesses with which they engage.
Did you miss the part where he claimed to be a internet cop doing “citizens arrests” on chat boards?
No one claimed anyone was infallible, so basically you're lying about what I said, clearly indicating you have no legitimate response to a comment you didn't like. How about when you start typing in a lie you stop and think that perhaps that's an indication that you have gone too far and should step away from the discussion?
I said nothing about being "a internet cop" or about "defending the sanctity" of anything. So you've labeled yourself as yet another poster stooping to lying about what I've said to cover up the wholesale failure of your argument.Did you miss the part where he claimed to be a internet cop doing “citizens arrests” on chat boards?
Though the original could've used some plussing here and there, it was a well-composed original story with live choreography and gorgeous costumes. Then the actor budget cut left the show running with loop holes and parts missing. Then eventually all of it was chopped for an IP-based show(which can work if done well) that was thrown together in a rush and doesn't even use half of the tech capabilities... It's just kind of telling about the decisions being made...
No, truly, if you have to stoop to lying about what another poster posted, then truly you need to rethink posting that.
Then why did you post this reply?
Disney isn't my friend. As a matter of fact, the problem seems to be that several posters in this thread think that it should be their friend.
