If Thomas Staggs replaces Bob Iger...

Monoblanco13

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
I was wondering if Thomas Staggs was to replace Bob Iger would it mean good things for Disney Parks and Resorts? From what I have read about him he's very personable and currently the Chairman of the parks and resorts. Any professional opinions? Should I be excited for what may come in the following years? (Other than whats been announced already)
 

Monoblanco13

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Yea but under Iger if I'm not mistaken Disney acquired Marvel, Pixar, and Lucas Arts. We also received the current rendition of New Fantasyland. Avatar, Pixar and Starwars are coming to the parks. I am not defending him but what has he done wrong? I'm uneducated with what Iger has done wrong.
 
Last edited:

ToInfinityAndBeyond

Well-Known Member
Yea but under Iger if I'm not mistaken Disney acquired Marvel, Pixar, and Lucas Arts. We also received the current rendition of New Fantasyland. Avatar, Pixar and Starwars are coming to the parks. I am not defending him but what has he done wrong? I'm uneducated with what Iger has done wrong.

He's the face of a company that isn't doing things the way some people want them to be done. Beyond that, unless someone has some good inside information about what he has personally done (or hasn't done) I have no idea.
 

Monoblanco13

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
He's the face of a company that isn't doing things the way some people want them to be done. Beyond that, unless someone has some good inside information about what he has personally done (or hasn't done) I have no idea.

See that's what I thought. I know his main focus isn't the parks but changes are coming. I wonder if Staggs will take care of the parks better due to his current role?
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
I was wondering if Thomas Staggs was to replace Bob Iger would it mean good things for Disney Parks and Resorts? From what I have read about him he's very personable and currently the Chairman of the parks and resorts. Any professional opinions? Should I be excited for what may come in the following years? (Other than whats been announced already)
Staggs was just promoted to COO and is one of the top masterminds behind Eisner's later, awful years.
 

Monoblanco13

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
He brought back traditional animation... And then got rid of it again after only TWO MOVIES.

The only movie I could think of is the Princess and the Frog which still had CGI if I am not mistaken, whats the other?
Also that movie wasn't a box office hit no? If I remember correctly it didn't hit the numbers they wanted and Tangled did. Business prospective maybe its not profitable for these types of films anymore though I love the old school animation techniques.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
See that's what I thought. I know his main focus isn't the parks but changes are coming. I wonder if Staggs will take care of the parks better due to his current role?
Strategic Planning did not care for the parks. Staggs headed up Strategic Planning. Why should it be assumed that now he loves the parks because he looks good in photo ops and has the right quotes referenced?
 

Monoblanco13

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Strategic Planning did not care for the parks. Staggs headed up Strategic Planning. Why should it be assumed that now he loves the parks because he looks good in photo ops and has the right quotes referenced?

I unfortunately don't know any better and figured what better place to ask than on this forum.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
In what sense? All I know is he went from CFO to CHairman of Parks and Resorts due to Iger. Also that he's been within Disney since 1990.
He ran Strategic Planning, the group that overwhelmingly influenced almost every single decision Eisner made during that period.
 

Monoblanco13

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
He ran Strategic Planning, the group that overwhelmingly influenced almost every single decision Eisner made during that period.

Eisner gets a load of crap but my understanding is he did some good as well, didn't he bring us Star Tours and AE? I know about all the bad sequels.
 

P_Radden

Well-Known Member
Can someone enlighten me on how capex (right term?) decisions for parks and resorts works? What is the process from concept/need to approval to construction?

For example, all the things you read about on here that are complaints about WDW (such as lack of investing in Epcot's empty buildings, monorail conditions, DAK needing more E, D and even C tickets, blaw blaw blaw..), who is the man in charge of getting these things done? Is it up to Staggs because he is head of Parks and Resorts to request more money for WDW? Can Staggs say "Okay guys, the monorail system is in need of a major refurbishment/expansion, here is what it will cost, lets get it done." Or are his hands tied? Is it up to the board of directors how much money WDW gets and how it is split up and how it is spent? Can even Iger make those decisions?

I just want to understand how and why WDW seems to just get by on things (like empty buildings at Epcot) instead of setting the bar high as they have in the past. Who is overseeing WDW parks, who is the person that could really make a difference for WDW, if there even is a person?

Sorry if I am talking like an idiot. I know Disney is a corporation that is most concerned with its stock price/share holders etc, but I am genuinely interested in how things get done (or why they are not getting done) at WDW.
 

Monoblanco13

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Can someone enlighten me on how capex (right term?) decisions for parks and resorts works? What is the process from concept/need to approval to construction?

For example, all the things you read about on here that are complaints about WDW (such as lack of investing in Epcot's empty buildings, monorail conditions, DAK needing more E, D and even C tickets, blaw blaw blaw..), who is the man in charge of getting these things done? Is it up to Staggs because he is head of Parks and Resorts to request more money for WDW? Can Staggs say "Okay guys, the monorail system is in need of a major refurbishment/expansion, here is what it will cost, lets get it done." Or are his hands tied? Is it up to the board of directors how much money WDW gets and how it is split up and how it is spent? Can even Iger make those decisions?

I just want to understand how and why WDW seems to just get by on things (like empty buildings at Epcot) instead of setting the bar high as they have in the past. Who is overseeing WDW parks, who is the person that could really make a difference for WDW, if there even is a person?

Sorry if I am talking like an idiot. I know Disney is a corporation that is most concerned with its stock price/share holders etc, but I am genuinely interested in how things get done (or why they are not getting done) at WDW.

I'm with you I would like to know the same. I also wish there was something we could do about it other thn complain on boards, or for me try to talk to the surveyors around the parks.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom