I’ve noticed Mix Magic does not use the Fantasyland launchers, only the main site and the 9 line.

The_Bellringer

Active Member
Original Poster
Are they doing this for a reason? Maybe trying not to close Fantasyland during the Fireworks?

Also, where exactly IS the 9 line? I can only see the main pad a little NW of toontown on a map. Not the 9 line.
 

The_Bellringer

Active Member
Original Poster
If they're not using the Fantasyland pyro- then you hit the nail on the head. I'd bet good money it's cause operations got sick of having to close a bunch of rides for a 10 minute show.
I agree. I also think with SWL opening, they can’t afford to close an entire land anymore.
 

Darkbeer1

Well-Known Member
Yes, a big part of it is cost savings, not only in less closures, but less fallout, and therefore less safety zones both on stage and backstage. That requires less labor, and more onstage being open allows better guest flow.

The new show was to address a few things. One was a desire to have a show that could operate 7 nights a week, even on slow weeknights. (The city of Anaheim limits the amount of days High level fireworks can be used). Also the financial end, a slow day show has to be fairly inexpensive to run. Also weather, this time of year you can have forced cancellations due to rain and/or wind. This show allows the non-fireworks show segments to operate on those days. Also, you can operate it after 10 PM, due to the fact Firework permits prevent them from being used after 10, even mid show.

So money and operations had major influence over the new event.

And expect it to be the norm. Major fireworks in peak summer, and more multi-media events the rest of the year.
 

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
Yes, a big part of it is cost savings, not only in less closures, but less fallout, and therefore less safety zones both on stage and backstage. That requires less labor, and more onstage being open allows better guest flow.

The new show was to address a few things. One was a desire to have a show that could operate 7 nights a week, even on slow weeknights. (The city of Anaheim limits the amount of days High level fireworks can be used). Also the financial end, a slow day show has to be fairly inexpensive to run. Also weather, this time of year you can have forced cancellations due to rain and/or wind. This show allows the non-fireworks show segments to operate on those days. Also, you can operate it after 10 PM, due to the fact Firework permits prevent them from being used after 10, even mid show.

So money and operations had major influence over the new event.

And expect it to be the norm. Major fireworks in peak summer, and more multi-media events the rest of the year.

Sounds like a good deal to me. Unfortunately, the show sucks.
 

The_Bellringer

Active Member
Original Poster
Yes, a big part of it is cost savings, not only in less closures, but less fallout, and therefore less safety zones both on stage and backstage. That requires less labor, and more onstage being open allows better guest flow.

The new show was to address a few things. One was a desire to have a show that could operate 7 nights a week, even on slow weeknights. (The city of Anaheim limits the amount of days High level fireworks can be used). Also the financial end, a slow day show has to be fairly inexpensive to run. Also weather, this time of year you can have forced cancellations due to rain and/or wind. This show allows the non-fireworks show segments to operate on those days. Also, you can operate it after 10 PM, due to the fact Firework permits prevent them from being used after 10, even mid show.

So money and operations had major influence over the new event.

And expect it to be the norm. Major fireworks in peak summer, and more multi-media events the rest of the year.
Sounds smart tbh. I think Disneyland can’t afford to close 2 entire lands every night in peak season. Especially when SWL opens.

Also, where is the 9 line located? I can’t find it on a map anywhere.
 

D.Silentu

Well-Known Member
While I'm sure it was Star Wars that forced their hand, I'm glad that the Fantasyland closures will soon be a thing of the past. It appears that lazers and projection mapping are becoming the substitutes for the in park fireworks. I appreciate that they're using these to create new destinations spread throughout the park for fireworks viewing; I remember a time when Tomorrowland was my favorite spot to do so. This Mickey show may be underwhelming, but I am encouraged by the infrastructure that they are setting for all future shows.
 

Ismael Flores

Well-Known Member
i just wish they had added more props since fireworks will not be used often. how anout more of those themed inflatables and more lasers to really make it feel like a dance party.

also seems like this show will concentrate only mainstreet and IASW mall so the crowds will be awful once fireworks are not used. not enough projevtion areas in hub area and no viewing near the river of America.
 

SuddenStorm

Well-Known Member
The fireworks that will have an impact on SWL are the ones from the main site, not the ones from Fantasyland

Yes, but with the added demand SWL is expected to bring, they really can't afford to be shutting down Fantasyland for an hour or so each night for fireworks. Every attraction and show in that resort will need to be firing on all cylinders.
 

Disneysea05

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
Yes
I wonder what is the distance between the launch site and the small world mall and the launch site and open air guest areas in Galaxies Edge?
 
Last edited:

Timothy_Q

Well-Known Member
Yes, but with the added demand SWL is expected to bring, they really can't afford to be shutting down Fantasyland for an hour or so each night for fireworks. Every attraction and show in that resort will need to be firing on all cylinders.
Well, it would make more sense to close Fantasyland than SWL, if they were to keep doing fireworks.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom