Here is a nice little article from Forbes.
http://www.forbes.com/business/energy/feeds/ap/2005/03/16/ap1886451.html
Question Disney on Hong Kong
03.16.2005, 01:12 AM
Lawmakers on Wednesday questioned The Walt Disney Co.'s 20-year option to buy a 54-hectare (130-acre) site near Hong Kong Disneyland, saying the government should consider letting other theme parks use the land.
"From Hong Kong's standpoint, it doesn't necessarily have to be Disneyland. Other than Disneyland, there are many other theme parks popular in the world," opposition lawmaker Sin Chung-kai said at a legislative hearing on Hong Kong Disneyland, due to open Sept. 12.
Disney has the first claim to the site up to 2019. The option can be extended up to 10 years if visitor numbers hit 8 million.
Commissioner for Tourism Eva Cheng defended the arrangement, saying it was necessary to secure the Disney deal.
"If Disney knew there would be a different theme park nearby, it would have affected Disney's decision to build Hong Kong Disneyland at the time. This is fair," she said.
She said the government hopes to launch talks with Disney on exercising its land option soon.
However, Hong Kong media last year quoted Financial Secretary Henry Tang as saying that the government has approached three other U.S. theme park companies about coming to Hong Kong - Six Flags Inc., Universal Studios, and Warner Bros. Studios - a subsidiary of Time Warner Inc.
The 125-hectare (310-acre) Hong Kong Disneyland is a joint venture between Disney and the Hong Kong government, but local taxpayers are footing most of its US$3.5 billion (euro2.6 million) price tag. Critics have questioned whether Hong Kong got a good deal.
Cheng said the government will test the park and its transportation infrastructure ahead of the scheduled opening by inviting tour operators and Hong Kong residents to visit.
Separately, government engineering official Yip Sai-chor told lawmakers the government has nearly finished processing 30,000 cubic meters (1.05 million cubic feet) of toxic mud from a shipyard cleared for Disneyland's construction. The waste was treated at an island off Hong Kong, prompting at least one protest.
It would be interesting to see another park to try to compete, but with half the property size as HKDL, it would obviously be difficult. Since the additional land is not that large (enough for one more park and a two or three hotels) I would rather have Disney buy the land.
I would rather see Universal build a resort on 300 acres of land with in a 10 mile radius like in orlando. However since Universal isn't very certain in keeping their US parks and their quick dump of the park in Spain, I do not see this as a likely possibility.
http://www.forbes.com/business/energy/feeds/ap/2005/03/16/ap1886451.html
Question Disney on Hong Kong
03.16.2005, 01:12 AM
Lawmakers on Wednesday questioned The Walt Disney Co.'s 20-year option to buy a 54-hectare (130-acre) site near Hong Kong Disneyland, saying the government should consider letting other theme parks use the land.
"From Hong Kong's standpoint, it doesn't necessarily have to be Disneyland. Other than Disneyland, there are many other theme parks popular in the world," opposition lawmaker Sin Chung-kai said at a legislative hearing on Hong Kong Disneyland, due to open Sept. 12.
Disney has the first claim to the site up to 2019. The option can be extended up to 10 years if visitor numbers hit 8 million.
Commissioner for Tourism Eva Cheng defended the arrangement, saying it was necessary to secure the Disney deal.
"If Disney knew there would be a different theme park nearby, it would have affected Disney's decision to build Hong Kong Disneyland at the time. This is fair," she said.
She said the government hopes to launch talks with Disney on exercising its land option soon.
However, Hong Kong media last year quoted Financial Secretary Henry Tang as saying that the government has approached three other U.S. theme park companies about coming to Hong Kong - Six Flags Inc., Universal Studios, and Warner Bros. Studios - a subsidiary of Time Warner Inc.
The 125-hectare (310-acre) Hong Kong Disneyland is a joint venture between Disney and the Hong Kong government, but local taxpayers are footing most of its US$3.5 billion (euro2.6 million) price tag. Critics have questioned whether Hong Kong got a good deal.
Cheng said the government will test the park and its transportation infrastructure ahead of the scheduled opening by inviting tour operators and Hong Kong residents to visit.
Separately, government engineering official Yip Sai-chor told lawmakers the government has nearly finished processing 30,000 cubic meters (1.05 million cubic feet) of toxic mud from a shipyard cleared for Disneyland's construction. The waste was treated at an island off Hong Kong, prompting at least one protest.
It would be interesting to see another park to try to compete, but with half the property size as HKDL, it would obviously be difficult. Since the additional land is not that large (enough for one more park and a two or three hotels) I would rather have Disney buy the land.
I would rather see Universal build a resort on 300 acres of land with in a 10 mile radius like in orlando. However since Universal isn't very certain in keeping their US parks and their quick dump of the park in Spain, I do not see this as a likely possibility.