HK Mulls Building 2nd Park Next To Disneyland

speck76

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
October 27, 2004 6:02 a.m.

HONG KONG -- The Hong Kong government Wednesday said it is considering building a second theme park in the territory, which could complement or compete with the Disney park which is to open in late 2005.

Hong Kong Disneyland, which is under construction on Lantau Island, is a central part of Hong Kong's effort to make itself a more enticing destination for tourists from mainland China and elsewhere. But the latest proposal shows that the government could well invest in other major attractions to draw visitors.

Peggy Chau, a spokeswoman for the Housing, Planning and Lands Bureau, said a second theme park on Lantau "is one of the options we will consider." Located to the west of Hong Kong Island, Lantau Island is home to Hong Kong's airport, but much of it is undeveloped or reserved for country parks.

"It is at a very early stage," she said. "It would be one to two years at least before any plan is put forward," given the time needed for gauging public reaction and follow-up analysis and planning, Chau said.

In a briefing paper sent to the legislature this week, the government listed a number of possible new tourism projects on Lantau Island. One site was marked as a "possible theme park."

Other proposed attractions included a golf course and resort on the northeast part of the island, and another resort on the southern end. There were also smaller-scale options for drawing tourists, such as setting up a museum, preserving a traditional fishing village as an attraction, building bicycle paths and watersports facilities, and expanding trails and camping in existing parks.

In an interview with the Chinese-language Sing Tao Daily published Wednesday, Financial Secretary Henry Tang said a second theme park would help Hong Kong accomodate a greater number and variety of visitors.

"If people between their teens and 30s who don't have families go to Disneyland with their friends, after once or twice, they might not want to go there every time," the paper quoted Tang as saying.

Tang was also reported to have said the government is approaching three U.S. theme park companies about coming to Hong Kong: Six Flags Inc. (PKS), the Universal Studios unit of General Electric Corp.'s (GE) NBC Universal, and Warner Bros. Studios, a unit of Time Warner Inc. (TWX).

Tang and his press secretary were traveling Wednesday, and his office said no one was available to confirm the reported remarks.

The government is the majority investor in the US$3.5 billion Hong Kong Disneyland project, meaning that Hong Kong taxpayers are paying for most of the needed infrastructure. Walt Disney Co. (DIS) owns 43% of the project.

Hong Kong is to launch a formal consultation process later in 2004 to gauge public response to the various proposals for developing Lantau Island, including the possible second theme park, Chau said.

-By Andrew Batson, Dow Jones Newswires; 852-2802-7002; andrew.batson@dowjones.com
 

jrriddle

Well-Known Member
I'm guessing that Disney has a 2nd park planned (I believe on of the maps floating around the net shows that it still has to be reclaimed - it's still just water right now), but if they are being approached by Warners, 6-Flags, etc. I guess that it may not be a Disney Park being talked about in this article.
Hey competition is good right?
 

DarkMeasures

New Member
Competition is good.

It keeps park expansion constantly going.
It keeps prices down.
It keeps guests on vacation longer.

It is good, though the extra money would probably fare better in advancing HK Disneyland which needs the money. At least the Chinese are more willing to buy American products than the French.
 

cherrynegra

Well-Known Member
Oh suuuuuuuurrrre. Now they discuss a second park going in after the attractions for HK are already announced and the park is nearing completion. And if competitors set up shop then they have a leg up because they'll be able to see how well or not the HK park does and plan accordingly. However, I wouldn't put it past Disney pride to make sure another park didn't go up too close to them.
 

Hobnail Boot

Well-Known Member
Oh good God. Actually FINISH Hong Kong Disneyland first before even considering a second theme park. HKDL couldn't keep me there for more than half a day, so maybe they should focus on that little problem before thinking about a second park.
 

DarkMeasures

New Member
I forgot where I read it but it seems the other park would literally be right next to HKDL. It seems that the other park would take up the 2nd phase space....

Now that would be a horrible thing for the Chinese Government to do. Forcing the competition so close to each other would ruin the magic for both parks, even a Six Flags park.
 

WDWGarden

New Member
The second phase piece of the HKDL site is quite definately a Disney park. Absolutley not another company. I think this article is talking about a possible alternate site on Lantau Island, which is relatively undeveloped compared with most of HK.
 

DarkMeasures

New Member
gardabble said:
Personally, I'd rather see Ocean Park get developed into Six-Flags rather than putting in a competing Disney on Lantau Island.

So you would rather see a perfectly good park get destroyed by Premier parks?

Anyway, Premier Parks sold off all their foreign parks as well as a good amount of American Parks. Because of that there is another 2 Cedar Fair parks in close proximity to each other.
 

cherrynegra

Well-Known Member
Oh God no!! I think Ocean Park can do well on their own without having Premier Parks interfering. Trust me!! You don't want Six-Flags running Ocean Park.
 

gardabble

New Member
cherrynegra said:
Oh God no!! I think Ocean Park can do well on their own without having Premier Parks interfering. Trust me!! You don't want Six-Flags running Ocean Park.
Once a magapark moves into the neighborhood, the competing park also wants to be a megapark too. This is what the management of Ocean Park wants, these guys want to convert their theme park to a resort to offer hotels and spas. The reason why I say six-flags should be part of Ocean Park is mainly because Ocean Park has only had about 5-6 thrill rides. Their attractions already resembles close to it but Ocean Park definitely weak on attractions in my opinion.
 

netenyahoo

New Member
I think competition is great, but would two Disney parks and another park relatively close together be good? It would be really crowded I think.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom