I've been thinking about the various complaints about Tomorrowland and the attractions they add to them, WDW and Anaheim mainly.
Paris doesn't have one, Tokyo is basically the same rides we had 30 years ago, and Hong Kong is pretty light with the exception of the new Iron Man ride. Shanghai is also pretty light on attractions.
Anaheim and WDW both had Tomorrowlands that were practically unfinished at park opening and took a few years to fully have enough of attractions to consider it a full land.
The Autopia/ Indy Motor speedway never felt futuristic in the parks either.
Those are just my thoughts when we consider the idea vs. reality of Tomorrowland.
Yes, there were definitely great parts to the various ones (monorail, peoplemover), but they seemed to always have something that didn't fit right.
Paris doesn't have one, Tokyo is basically the same rides we had 30 years ago, and Hong Kong is pretty light with the exception of the new Iron Man ride. Shanghai is also pretty light on attractions.
Anaheim and WDW both had Tomorrowlands that were practically unfinished at park opening and took a few years to fully have enough of attractions to consider it a full land.
The Autopia/ Indy Motor speedway never felt futuristic in the parks either.
Those are just my thoughts when we consider the idea vs. reality of Tomorrowland.
Yes, there were definitely great parts to the various ones (monorail, peoplemover), but they seemed to always have something that didn't fit right.