I'm a pretty avid photographer, but I've done so under a pretty tight budget. I'm 25 and I grew up in a family where everything outside of daily life was considered a waste of money... wake up, go to work, come home, eat dinner, shower, bed... do it all over again. My parents, and my entire family for that matter, had zero hobbies, period.
I went to school, worked hard... am gainfully employed but am certainly handicapped by significant undergrad debt.
I feel that I have done some amazing work with what little I actually have. I am extremely pleased with my Nikon D80 body but my lenses don't make the cut. I have a 50mm 1.8 Nikon lens which I think is one of the best bangs for your buck in the photo world. I'm looking for a versatile, fast, crisp and sharp wide-zoom lens but where do I draw the line? The lenses are EXPENSIVE! Where do you draw the line? Especially if you are simply a hobbyist or amateur photographer?
I went to school, worked hard... am gainfully employed but am certainly handicapped by significant undergrad debt.
I feel that I have done some amazing work with what little I actually have. I am extremely pleased with my Nikon D80 body but my lenses don't make the cut. I have a 50mm 1.8 Nikon lens which I think is one of the best bangs for your buck in the photo world. I'm looking for a versatile, fast, crisp and sharp wide-zoom lens but where do I draw the line? The lenses are EXPENSIVE! Where do you draw the line? Especially if you are simply a hobbyist or amateur photographer?