GE to keep Universal - For Now

Lynx04

New Member
Original Poster
Just read this:

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/business/orl-bizuniversal13011305jan13,1,6289293.story?coll=orl-business-headlines&ctrack=1&cset=true

GE to keep Universal -- for now
The company has pledged not to sell its stake in the resort for at least another year.
By Sean Mussenden | Sentinel Staff Writer
Posted January 13, 2005


General Electric Co. has locked itself into the volatile theme-park business for another year, promising not to sell its share of Universal Orlando at least until 2006, according to company documents.
The industrial giant became a co-owner of the two-park resort last year when NBC -- a GE subsidiary -- merged with the entertainment unit of Vivendi Universal in a $14 billion deal.
Under an old agreement between GE and Blackstone Group -- the New York private-equity firm that owns the other half of Universal Orlando -- either company could have bought out the other's share after Feb. 1, 2005.
A new agreement, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, will prevent both companies from selling their stakes to each other -- or to another company -- until after Jan. 1, 2006.
After completing the merger in May, GE executives talked favorably about Universal's worldwide theme-park business. Months earlier, they had raised the possibility of selling the parks, citing an industrywide travel slump.
Analysts and company insiders predicted at the time that GE, a tightly managed company, would not have the stomach for the capital-intensive and fluctuating theme-park business. The parks would eventually go up for sale, they said.
The new agreement -- and the fact that the Orlando parks are poised to turn their first profit in four years -- has done little to alter that sentiment.
"My guess is still that GE will eventually sell," said longtime media analyst Harold Vogel, owner of Vogel Capital Management, a venture-capital and trading fund in New York. "But they're in no rush to do it."
The extended agreement will give Universal Orlando another year to improve its financial health, making it more attractive to potential suitors, analysts said.
The parks have been in the red since 2000, losing $87 million in 2001, and $52 million in 2002 and again in 2003, according to company financial statements. As the tourism industry began to recover in 2004, the parks got on track to turn a profit for the first time in years.
Full 2004 numbers are not yet available. Through the first three quarters of 2004, the parks made $24 million; they lost $33 million during the same period in 2003, according to company filings.
It's not apparent what Blackstone or GE will do next year. An NBC Universal spokesman could not be reached for comment Wednesday.
"It's very unclear what will happen at that point. Clearly, we're committed to holding it for a longer term," Blackstone spokesman John Ford said.
Local park officials said the agreement, filed last month as part of a restructuring of Universal Orlando's debt, indicates that both companies are pleased with the turnaround.
"Now we need to focus on the future and growing our business," Universal Orlando spokesman Tom Schroder said.
Sean Mussenden can be reached at smussenden@orlandosentinel.com or 407-420-5664.



Any thoughts???
 

Legacy

Well-Known Member
Good. GE keeping the parks could be a sign of exploratory growth. With the 50th going on down the road, it is very possible that Universal will see a large numbers jump. Combined with the new Fear Factor show ( :brick: ), this could be a productive enough year to persuade GE is keep the parks a while longer (at least until 2008, after the Jeep Safari is built at IoA).

But if they do sell, Blackstone Group would be a great company for full ownership.
 

Lynx04

New Member
Original Poster
Just a question of curiosity, why would you want the Blackstone Group to own 100%? What do they bring to the table?
 

Legacy

Well-Known Member
Lynx04 said:
Just a question of curiosity, why would you want the Blackstone Group to own 100%? What do they bring to the table?
For one, they at least are interested in the themepark industry. They funded half of IoA, and look at the success that was (critically, not so much numbers-wise). Because they really seem to enjoy it, I would rather have them own it than a company that doesn't really care.
 

Lynx04

New Member
Original Poster
I would agree 100%. Now the question is, do they have any interest in owning 100%, or are they trying to jump ship as well?
 

Legacy

Well-Known Member
Lynx04 said:
I would agree 100%. Now the question is, do they have any interest in owning 100%, or are they trying to jump ship as well?
For some reason I don't think they would. Being initial investors in IoA (I would think) would lead them to want to old out on it, at least until it looks like there is no chance. With the tourism industry turning, Universal really starting to compete and brighter outlook for themeparks in general, I think they would be foolish to drop the investment.

But you can never tell.
 

AndyP

Active Member
Its true, Universal may see visitor numbers increase this year because of Disney (obviously not in the same scale as Disney increase). Hopefully this will give the urge for more investment.Everyone knows the tourism industry is currently recovering and getting stronger. Especially with the weak dollar to the pound, lots of Florida adverts on over here in the UK :D
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom