I know it sounds terrible, but I imagine it would be far easier to expand existing parks - and then charge more money for tickets - then build a 5th gate.
For example, capacity is too high at MK, too low at DHS. They could make MK substantially better through further expansion (maybe a TL thingy), but then just charge more for it. They could also make DHS better, charge the same, making it a worthwhile alternative.
In basic economics you can fix scarcity with prices. I know I know. I'm not saying it's a good idea, I'm saying it might be a strategy that will work for them.
Make MK a $120 park, DHS an $80 park.
Or, maybe just continue to raise all ticket prices.
Regardless, they can pour a 5th gate's worth of money into existing park expansions, and recover the cost via raised prices. This is easier than building parking/transportation/support infrastructure for a brand new park.
Think about it. All they need to do to charge more money is make more things "must-dos". Some of us will be priced out, but many of us will pay if it's truly "must-do".
So, I'd prefer cheaper tickets and 5 gates, but considering how hard AK was to get up and running (still a challenge) and how DHS has long lost its status as a full-day park, I can't imagine they'd build a 5th gate. Instead, make DHS and AK full-day parks, then update EPCOT and MK and charge more for these as the "premium" monorail parks.
I called it first...
___
EDIT: In other words, instead of periodic updates, or even major expansions, they pour money into the parks representing the equivalent of a 5th gate investment - but only to the 4 existing gates. Then they charge more. This would be for all intents and purposes our "5th gate" sans the extra gate.
For example, capacity is too high at MK, too low at DHS. They could make MK substantially better through further expansion (maybe a TL thingy), but then just charge more for it. They could also make DHS better, charge the same, making it a worthwhile alternative.
In basic economics you can fix scarcity with prices. I know I know. I'm not saying it's a good idea, I'm saying it might be a strategy that will work for them.
Make MK a $120 park, DHS an $80 park.
Or, maybe just continue to raise all ticket prices.
Regardless, they can pour a 5th gate's worth of money into existing park expansions, and recover the cost via raised prices. This is easier than building parking/transportation/support infrastructure for a brand new park.
Think about it. All they need to do to charge more money is make more things "must-dos". Some of us will be priced out, but many of us will pay if it's truly "must-do".
So, I'd prefer cheaper tickets and 5 gates, but considering how hard AK was to get up and running (still a challenge) and how DHS has long lost its status as a full-day park, I can't imagine they'd build a 5th gate. Instead, make DHS and AK full-day parks, then update EPCOT and MK and charge more for these as the "premium" monorail parks.
I called it first...
___
EDIT: In other words, instead of periodic updates, or even major expansions, they pour money into the parks representing the equivalent of a 5th gate investment - but only to the 4 existing gates. Then they charge more. This would be for all intents and purposes our "5th gate" sans the extra gate.