Eisner Has Much to Say to Successor

speck76

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Eisner Has Much to Say to Successor
By Claire Hoffman
Los Angeles Times
5/27/2006

In Thursday's installment of the CNBC talk show "Conversations With Michael Eisner," shot at Spago restaurant in Beverly Hills, the former Walt Disney Co. chief executive welcomed the man who replaced him last year as the leader of the Burbank entertainment giant: Bob Iger.

"Its kind of odd for me to interview my successor," Eisner, 64, said right off the bat. Then, he proceeded to do much of the talking — and a little chiding. First, Eisner made it clear that he thought the jury was still out on whether Iger's biggest move since taking the job — the acquisition of Pixar Animation Studios for $7.4 billion — would prove financially sound.

"Everybody thinks I had a strained relationship with Steve Jobs…. Quite the opposite," Eisner said of Pixar's former chief. "My issue with Steve Jobs was only about money."

The implication was clear: Maybe Iger spent too much. "It probably will work out," Eisner added. "There are occasions when you spend a lot of money and the quality starts to evaporate that it doesn't work out. So it is a big bet."

The 55-year-old Iger, who moments earlier had indicated that he believed Pixar would help reinvigorate Disney's animation division, didn't flinch.

With folded hands and tight smiles, the two men talked briefly of Iger's determination to bring Disney into the digital age. Then Eisner got personal, asking about the difficult period at the end of 2004 and beginning of 2005, when Iger was waiting for Disney's board to decide whether to give him the top job.

Speculating that "the process … must have been for you a nightmare," Eisner told Iger that "it was clear you were going to get it in the end, at least to me, but … you had to sit there and watch the board interview in front of you all these candidates who weren't as qualified as you were."

"You did something in a million years I couldn't do," Eisner continued. "You kept your cool. For a year! I would have told everybody off."

Iger still kept his cool, betraying not a hint of emotion.

"It was not clear to me what the outcome would be," he responded, adding that he considers patience a virtue. "But it worked out all right."

The conversation ended when Eisner took off what he said was his favorite Mickey Mouse tie and gave it to Iger, who was already wearing a striped blue cravat.

"I'm now really out of Disney," Eisner said. "That's it. My tie is gone. I still have my Mickey Mouse underwear, but that's not here."

"Boxers or briefs?" Iger asked, playing along.

"Both," Eisner said.
 

Computer Magic

Well-Known Member
It has to burn Eisner ego that Iger landed Pixar. Was it worth 7.6 billion, I think so. But time will tell after a few more movies are released.
 
Eisner has a lot of company from many analysts when he speculates that Disney paid too much for Pixar.

In fact, I'm guessing that given the accelerated stock buy-back the Company has set forth, even Iger and the board agree to some extent.
 

Computer Magic

Well-Known Member
ThreeCircles said:
Eisner has a lot of company from many analysts when he speculates that Disney paid too much for Pixar.

In fact, I'm guessing that given the accelerated stock buy-back the Company has set forth, even Iger and the board agree to some extent.
Eisner knows all to well what its like to over pay for something...
 

speck76

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
I think the value of Pixar is hard to compute....

Pixar itself will not "pay for itself"....but if you add the revenue that it will bring in, and also add what Disney potentially would have lost had Pixar gone with another studio, and WDFA had the major competition....it gets close...
 

Computer Magic

Well-Known Member
speck76 said:
I think the value of Pixar is hard to compute....

Pixar itself will not "pay for itself"....but if you add the revenue that it will bring in, and also add what Disney potentially would have lost had Pixar gone with another studio, and WDFA had the major competition....it gets close...
I agree. It's the Total Ownership not just the cost of Pixar
 

DarkMeasures

New Member
I think the people from Pixar who were brought in are the best part of the deal and could help Disney earn millions.

I mean Steve Jobs does have both the Apple 2 and the iPod under his belt.
 

MickeyTigg

New Member
speck76 said:
"Everybody thinks I had a strained relationship with Steve Jobs…. Quite the opposite," Eisner said of Pixar's former chief. "My issue with Steve Jobs was only about money."

Right...is this why Jobs wouldn't even talk to Eisner and the minute Eisner's sorry butt is out the door Jobs is on the phone with Iger about a possible deal.

You just keep thinking that Mike.

Talk about denial.
 
TiggerRPh said:
Right...is this why Jobs wouldn't even talk to Eisner and the minute Eisner's sorry butt is out the door Jobs is on the phone with Iger about a possible deal.

You just keep thinking that Mike.

Talk about denial.

I doubt that anyone other than Eisner and Jobs know the whole truth surrounding the relationship.
 

kcnole

Well-Known Member
You've got to look at Pixar as much more than just the movies it produces. It was probably worth more to Disney than it may be to other folks. Disney now gets to keep it in the family, had Disney lost Pixar it would have lost one of its remaining scraps of legitimacy in the animation market. It now aquires Pixar with its cast of characters, many who are considered classics already. It has tons of characters to now bring into the theme park in a bigger basis and market the heck out of without having to pay the rights to Pixar now. It also received some wonderful leadership back into the parks. To me, what having some of the folks from Pixar working with WDI has done for the parks makes it well worth the price in my opinion. So far we're seeing a dramatic turn around in both quality and creativity and much of that is directly due to Pixar's aqusition.
 

Epcot82Guy

Well-Known Member
kcnole said:
You've got to look at Pixar as much more than just the movies it produces. It was probably worth more to Disney than it may be to other folks. Disney now gets to keep it in the family, had Disney lost Pixar it would have lost one of its remaining scraps of legitimacy in the animation market. It now aquires Pixar with its cast of characters, many who are considered classics already. It has tons of characters to now bring into the theme park in a bigger basis and market the heck out of without having to pay the rights to Pixar now. It also received some wonderful leadership back into the parks. To me, what having some of the folks from Pixar working with WDI has done for the parks makes it well worth the price in my opinion. So far we're seeing a dramatic turn around in both quality and creativity and much of that is directly due to Pixar's aqusition.

I agree. Pixar was not worth that as Pixar. BUT, Pixar may very well be worth that to Disney. It's not just an acquisition but perhaps salvation for the foundational part of the brand that has been, at best, highly faltering recently.
 

Tim G

Well-Known Member
ThreeCircles said:
I doubt that anyone other than Eisner and Jobs know the whole truth surrounding the relationship.
Right!!! LOL

They just ripped Robert Iger off... (he'll learn eventually, over the years to come)
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom