Earliest Versions of Disney’s Mickey Mouse and Minnie to Enter Public Domain in 2024

Dead2009

Horror Movie Guru
Original Poster

M-I-C-K-E-Y will soon belong to you and me.

With several asterisks, qualification and caveats, Mickey Mouse in his earliest form will be the leader of the band of characters, films and books that will become public domain as the year turns to 2024.

In a moment many close observers thought might never come, at least one version of the quintessential piece of intellectual property and perhaps the most iconic character in American pop culture will be free from Disney’s copyright as his first screen release, the 1928 short Steamboat Willie, featuring both Mickey and Minnie Mouse, becomes available for public use.

“This is it. This is Mickey Mouse. This is exciting because it’s kind of symbolic," said Jennifer Jenkins, a professor of law and director of Duke’s Center for the Study of Public Domain, who writes an annual Jan. 1 column for “Public Domain Day.” ”I kind of feel like the pipe on the steamboat, like expelling smoke. It’s so exciting.”

U.S. law allows a copyright to be held for 95 years after Congress expanded it several times during Mickey’s life.

“It’s sometimes derisively referred to as the Mickey Mouse Protection Act,” Jenkins said. “That’s oversimplified because it wasn’t just Disney that was pushing for term extension. It was a whole group of copyright holders whose works were set to go into the public domain soon, who benefited greatly from the 20 years of extra protection.”

“Ever since Mickey Mouse’s first appearance in the 1928 short film Steamboat Willie, people have associated the character with Disney’s stories, experiences, and authentic products," a Disney spokesperson said in a statement to The Associated Press. “That will not change when the copyright in the Steamboat Willie film expires.”

Current artists and creators will be able to make use of Mickey, but with major limits. It is only the more mischievous, rat-like, non-speaking boat captain in Steamboat Willie that has become public.

“More modern versions of Mickey will remain unaffected by the expiration of the Steamboat Willie copyright, and Mickey will continue to play a leading role as a global ambassador for the Walt Disney Company in our storytelling, theme park attractions, and merchandise,” Disney’s statement said.
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
There are many versions of Mickey. The one that will go into the public domain is Steamboat Willie.

TWDC has grown so massive, I think they don't care about Steamboat Willie like they don't care about Walt really.
 

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
What we need is someone to create a Public Domain Cinematic Universe... have Mickey team up with that horror film Winnie the Pooh etc...
Live action version of Runaway Brain.
iu
 

Robbiem

Well-Known Member
It’s going to be interesting to see how this all plays out.

As well as copyright there are also several trademarks for Mickey and co which don’t expire. Disney will also be able to use various laws to argue that a public domain mickey may cause confusion or trade on their name to try and stop things they don’t like

Up to now public domain has only really covered either classics like Sherlock Holmes or Treasure Island or characters who really aren’t pop culture now like oswald or gertie the dinosaur. Mickey and Pooh are the first real characters still in popular use to be public domain

The lawyers are going to be busy over the next few years with all this and whatever they decide will set interesting precedent for other IPs over the next dec or so when a lot of still relevant IP becomes public domain like Superman, Bugs Bunny etc
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
This is a perfect example of why copyrights should expire. Mickey’s been terribly underutilized by Disney, maybe someone will finally do something interesting with him for the first time in decades

Maybe its just me but I really don't need a bunch of non-Disney Steamboat Willie knock-offs flooding the market. Just like the Pooh Blood and Honey horror movie, I suspect most will just ignore whatever this horror Mickey movie will be and just say "not my Mickey".

Also while I know that some didn't like them but Disney had been producing a bunch of Mickey shorts for the past 10 years, I enjoyed all of them. What more did you want them to do with him? And would it have been with Steamboat Willie or more the classic 40s/50s version that everyone is used to?
 

Dead2009

Horror Movie Guru
Original Poster
Maybe its just me but I really don't need a bunch of non-Disney Steamboat Willie knock-offs flooding the market. Just like the Pooh Blood and Honey horror movie, I suspect most will just ignore whatever this horror Mickey movie will be and just say "not my Mickey".

Also while I know that some didn't like them but Disney had been producing a bunch of Mickey shorts for the past 10 years, I enjoyed all of them. What more did you want them to do with him? And would it have been with Steamboat Willie or more the classic 40s/50s version that everyone is used to?

Just wait till they hear about the rumored Bambi horror movie thats coming out.
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
Maybe its just me but I really don't need a bunch of non-Disney Steamboat Willie knock-offs flooding the market. Just like the Pooh Blood and Honey horror movie, I suspect most will just ignore whatever this horror Mickey movie will be and just say "not my Mickey".

Also while I know that some didn't like them but Disney had been producing a bunch of Mickey shorts for the past 10 years, I enjoyed all of them. What more did you want them to do with him? And would it have been with Steamboat Willie or more the classic 40s/50s version that everyone is used to?
Let the audiences and market decide. Are there too many Sherlock Holmes adaptations? Sure. But the recent BBC series, the Downey films, Great Mouse Detective, the Cushing/Lee stuff, Nicholas Meyers and Anthony Horowitz’s works are terrific. None of that would’ve been possible if still in copyright.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Let the audiences and market decide. Are there too many Sherlock Holmes adaptations? Sure. But the recent BBC series, the Downey films, Great Mouse Detective, the Cushing/Lee stuff, Nicholas Meyers and Anthony Horowitz’s works are terrific. None of that would’ve been possible if still in copyright.
There is a difference in my opinion between a regular fictional character and a what amounts to company trademarked mascot. Its not like Sherlock Holmes was the face of the BBC for example with the tagline "It was all created with a pipe at 221B Baker Street".

So while I agree for regular characters like Pooh, Snow White, or any other Disney characters we grew up with can and should have non-Disney versions. After all those were all taken from the public domain in the first place. However this is the first time a Disney created character hits the public domain, albeit only a specific version of that character. It just feels different, and not quite the same in my opinion.
 

BuddyThomas

Well-Known Member
How soon will we see Steam Boat Willie land added to

You mean the live action one for next year?
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom