-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
Disney's Master Plans
- Thread starter WDWKing
- Start date
Disney4648
New Member
Okay im confused, what "Master Plans"?
FantasiaBish
Member
http://www.wdwmagic.com/master.htm see them here....
Disney4648
New Member
Kewl, thanks for the link Fantasia!
Captain Cab
New Member
Wasn't that image previously displayed in Communicore?
PhotoDave219
Well-Known Member
Major thread drift......
Now if thats not messed up and inaccurate. I'm not trying to start a fight or get into the CNN vs Fox battle or anything, i'm trying to figure out how you got that conclusion. Have you done any independent research or a meta analysis to support this statement? Any data or hard facts at all?
Because i've done those sorts of things. I did a meta analysis comparing 4 hours of daily programming of the two networks during the sniper hunt, and my conclusions are completly the opposite of the opinion that your displaying in your sig file.
If you'd like i can send you some of the raw data or the conclusions. I'm just curious as to how you're drawing your conclusions?
Now if thats not messed up and inaccurate. I'm not trying to start a fight or get into the CNN vs Fox battle or anything, i'm trying to figure out how you got that conclusion. Have you done any independent research or a meta analysis to support this statement? Any data or hard facts at all?
Because i've done those sorts of things. I did a meta analysis comparing 4 hours of daily programming of the two networks during the sniper hunt, and my conclusions are completly the opposite of the opinion that your displaying in your sig file.
If you'd like i can send you some of the raw data or the conclusions. I'm just curious as to how you're drawing your conclusions?
Sir Hiss527
New Member
What are we talking about? I'm confused about the plans.
Captain Cab
New Member
Re: Major thread drift......
*start thread drift*
Here we go again. It's time for one of those "my opinion versus your opinion" discussions.
So, you're not trying to start a news media battle or anything, eh? You're certainly encouraging a discussion by publicily questioning Disney4648's signature. Is stating that CNN is "Unfair Opinions and Unbalanced News" "messed up and inaccurate"? Not really. Whether you'd like to believe it or not, CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, etc are all are very biased toward the liberals. One way to see this is just by watching the news shows and seeing what message they are trying to get out to the viewers. Are they for or against the news stories? Do they try to mislead the viewers by sending out their own message instead of the actual news item? You can go to online websites to see valid data on the subject. Here are some links to aid your search.
Media Bias Basics
http://www.honestreporting.com/
http://www.mediaresearch.org/
another media bias website
As for Fox News being "Fair and Balanced News", that is quite accurate. They report both sides of issues. Not just the liberal side. Not just the conservative side. That alone makes them more balanced than the other news media currently broadcasting. Watch some of the shows such as the O' Reilly Factor, Day Side, Your World, and Hannity & Colmes and just try to tell me that they aren't more balanced than CNN's Larry King Live, The Capital Gang, Crossfire, NewsNight and Wolf Blitzer. Just go ahead and try that challenge. I seriously doubt we'll ever see a news media being "absolute perfectly unbiased, and balanced", but right now Fox News certainly appears to be the most "fair and balanced" news agency broadcasting today.
So tell me, what did this "meta analysis" consist of? How did you achieve scientific results with something mainly based on opinions?
Flaw #1 - You cannot expect to get any accurate data just by comparing four hours of daily programming from each network. You have to find a way to compare the whole lineup for both networks for multible days and multiple news events.
Flaw #2 - You cannot limit yourself to just one news event and expect to get accurate results. Why not include news events such as the 2000 Presidential elections, Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom, the terrorism in Israel, the 9/11 terror attacks? More news items studied = much more accurate results.
As for the sniper hunt, I personally didn't care for Fox News's overall presentation, but it certainly doesn't mean that they aren't "fair and balanced" like they claim.
Ditto.
*end thread drift*
*start thread drift*
Here we go again. It's time for one of those "my opinion versus your opinion" discussions.
So, you're not trying to start a news media battle or anything, eh? You're certainly encouraging a discussion by publicily questioning Disney4648's signature. Is stating that CNN is "Unfair Opinions and Unbalanced News" "messed up and inaccurate"? Not really. Whether you'd like to believe it or not, CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, etc are all are very biased toward the liberals. One way to see this is just by watching the news shows and seeing what message they are trying to get out to the viewers. Are they for or against the news stories? Do they try to mislead the viewers by sending out their own message instead of the actual news item? You can go to online websites to see valid data on the subject. Here are some links to aid your search.
Media Bias Basics
http://www.honestreporting.com/
http://www.mediaresearch.org/
another media bias website
As for Fox News being "Fair and Balanced News", that is quite accurate. They report both sides of issues. Not just the liberal side. Not just the conservative side. That alone makes them more balanced than the other news media currently broadcasting. Watch some of the shows such as the O' Reilly Factor, Day Side, Your World, and Hannity & Colmes and just try to tell me that they aren't more balanced than CNN's Larry King Live, The Capital Gang, Crossfire, NewsNight and Wolf Blitzer. Just go ahead and try that challenge. I seriously doubt we'll ever see a news media being "absolute perfectly unbiased, and balanced", but right now Fox News certainly appears to be the most "fair and balanced" news agency broadcasting today.
So tell me, what did this "meta analysis" consist of? How did you achieve scientific results with something mainly based on opinions?
Flaw #1 - You cannot expect to get any accurate data just by comparing four hours of daily programming from each network. You have to find a way to compare the whole lineup for both networks for multible days and multiple news events.
Flaw #2 - You cannot limit yourself to just one news event and expect to get accurate results. Why not include news events such as the 2000 Presidential elections, Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom, the terrorism in Israel, the 9/11 terror attacks? More news items studied = much more accurate results.
As for the sniper hunt, I personally didn't care for Fox News's overall presentation, but it certainly doesn't mean that they aren't "fair and balanced" like they claim.
Ditto.
*end thread drift*
PhotoDave219
Well-Known Member
Well crap, i just wasted an education on journalism. $14 grand in loans and i coulda learned it all from you, Cap. I think i'll go get my money back.....
Captain Cab
New Member
Hey, I'm just asking some valid questions against your questions. Nothing wrong with that. If you'd like I can try to use some sarcasm to make you feel better. 
PhotoDave219
Well-Known Member
then you should use it.... :animwink:
Horizons1
Well-Known Member
Ya know,They have those framed and hanging up in a building backstage at EPCOT.I think its called the Magic Music Days building.I just know i saw those in the building we warmed up in when my band preformed at EPCOT.Actually they only had the 3rd picture in there but still i remember telling my friends about.
