Seriously figmentcrazy, what they are doing may seem silly but the purchase of the network won't really be much in the way of immediate cash out of Disney's pocket and they can use profits made from the networks (assuming they can turn them around) to pay for their costs. Managed debt in a corporate sense is not always a bad thing. It's sounds strange but it's not the same when a large company is in debt for millions or billions as it is when you and I are in the hole for $20,000 on credit cards. It's more like a mortgage. You could buy a home with an $100,000 loan. You would be in debt because of that loan for decades but it's not looked at the same way revolving credit is.
As for the resort. The idea being that once it's built and running, it will pay for itself and then some. That's for the DVC anyway which has proven to be enormously successful. The fact that they are doing this when they Yacht and Beach club villas are not even complete yet would suggest that there is enough demand for this. Really if you think about it, the DVC would be sort of recession proof because all the people using the program have already committed to the long term. They are paying for the use of the resorts weather they choose to use them or not so chances are most people will use them. That's a lot more of a guarantee than the standard resort guests give Disney as far as a return on Disney's investment goes. From what I understand, guests won't even notice most of the people missing from the parks since they were mostly higher management in salaried positions anyway. Those kinds of layoffs effect the structure of how things are run - not so much the number of people there to help the guest. With the construction and acquisition, they are helping to grow the company to generate further profit. Having a bunch of people around that they believe they can do without has sort of the opposite effect.