Disney & 'Shrek' Producer John Williams Partner For New CG Animated Film Output

TURKEY

New Member
Original Poster
The Walt Disney Studios and 'Shrek' Producer John Williams Partner For New CG Animated Film Output
Updated: Thursday, September 5, 2002 11:00 AM ET Printer-friendly version

BURBANK, Calif., Sept. 5 /PRNewswire/ -- The Walt Disney Studios and John Williams' Vanguard Films have teamed up in a strategic partnership to produce a slate of computer animated feature films, it was announced by ________ Cook, Chairman, The Walt Disney Studios and John Williams, CEO of Vanguard Films.

The first film to go into production will be "Valiant," followed by an anticipated slate of three more CG-animated films. Additionally, "Valiant" will mark the launch of a new venture, Vanguard Animation, which will expand Vanguard from an independent production company into a fully financed digital animation studio with the capability to internally develop and finance its own projects. John Williams will act as CEO of the new company and new Vanguard addition, Neil Braun, will act as President.

Commenting upon the announcement, Cook said, "We are thrilled to join forces with John, Neil and their incredible team of top animators in this extraordinary production partnership. 'Valiant' is a terrific story that will live up to the highest standards of animation, and Vanguard's exciting development slate promises great entertainment that will certainly appeal to all audiences."

Thomas Schumacher, president of Walt Disney Feature Animation, added, "John, Neil and the team at Vanguard have certainly shown that they possess a fine sense of story and are capable of the highest-quality animation, certainly worthy of the Disney name. We're excited to be making this partnership."

"We have set-up a unique approach to funding and making these movies," explains Williams. "Our production approach is best summarized by the fact that we will make these films for under $40 million each, and they will be delivered within two years of their start date. We will deliver 'Toy Story'- to-'Dinosaur'-to-'Shrek'-level animation. We came to Disney with confirmed financing, completed scripts, completed budgets, multiple CG tests for each film, and advanced character designs, and production design concepts."

"Valiant" is a ne'er-do-well wood pigeon who aspires to the prestigious position of a messenger homing bird for the Royal Air Force during WWII. Vastly unqualified for the job, Valiant serendipitously squeaks his way through training and is abruptly sent on a mission into occupied France. Finding himself in the line of fire, the prankster recedes and a hero emerges.

"Valiant" will start pre-production this month in Los Angeles then move to Ealing Studios in London for production. The picture will be released in fall 2004. The film will be co-produced with Barnaby Thompson who is a producer/partner of Fragile Films and Ealing Studios. Eric M. Bennett, president of production for Vanguard Animation, will co-produce the picture.

"Our objective with all of these films is to make animated films that are great comedies, great adventures, and great entertainment and which are suitable for a broad family audience, and that can also attract anyone who likes a big comedy entertainment," says Williams.

As the newly formed alliances move forward, John Williams will continue in the top post as Chairman and CEO of Vanguard Animation, directly overseeing all aspects of the company. John was the originating producer of the critically acclaimed box office success "Shrek." His other credits include next month's live-action action-adventure "The Tuxedo," starring Jackie Chan, and "Seven Years in Tibet."

Neil Braun, who recently joined the company as President, has pursued a very aggressive and successful round of financing for Vanguard Animation as the company looks to scale up operations. In the past, Neil has held numerous senior positions within the media and entertainment industry, including President of the NBC Television Network, Chairman and CEO of Viacom Entertainment, President of Imagine Entertainment, and Senior Vice President of HBO.

The buildout of Vanguard's physical animation studio will be directly overseen by Curtis Augspurger and Buckley Collum of Menace FX. Menace has joined forces with Vanguard Animation in a joint venture to oversee the establishment of the vast CG operation. Curtis and Buckley, who have worked extensively on digital production with companies including Warner Bros., Disney, and Electronic Arts, will also co-produce "Valiant."

Roy Furman and Tom Lewyn are directors of Vanguard Animation and were instrumental in pulling together the company.

For further information, please contact Heidi Trotta, Senior Vice President, Publicity of The Walt Disney Studios, +1-818-560-7280.

MAKE YOUR OPINION COUNT - Click Here

http://tbutton.prnewswire.com/prn/11690X36446830

SOURCE The Walt Disney Studios

CONTACT: Heidi Trotta, Senior Vice President, Publicity of The Walt Disney Studios, +1-818-560-7280



http://www.quicken.com/investments/...ws/stories/pr/20020905/LATH053.htm&symbol=DIS
 

pheneix

Well-Known Member
Well, I'm sure Disney fans around the world who dissed Shrek to no end (face it people, Shrek was better than Monsters Inc) are doing cartwheels right now.

It is also very clear that the writing is on the wall for Pixar...
 

tmp

Member
Originally posted by pheneix
Well, I'm sure Disney fans around the world who dissed Shrek to no end (face it people, Shrek was better than Monsters Inc) are doing cartwheels right now.

It is also very clear that the writing is on the wall for Pixar...

Well, you called me on the carpet. Actually I am doing backflips not cartwheels. I still do not think Shrek was better then Monsters.
 

Rider

Well-Known Member
I liked both.

I think Disney is being very smart. They are losing Pixar so they pick up the only other big name in CG.

They should be good as long as they don't screw this up.
 

NowInc

Well-Known Member
Shrek was nothing more than corporate kidney jabs...it only did well because it used "fart joke" mentality.

...and no..im not showing any pixar bias here ;)
 

NowInc

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by Rider
I liked both.

I think Disney is being very smart. They are losing Pixar so they pick up the only other big name in CG.

They should be good as long as they don't screw this up.

They are fffffffffffaaaaaaaaaaar from losing pixar..trust me ;)
 

MKCustodial

Well-Known Member
They are totally different movies, it's like comparing Bug's life to Antz just beacuse they both deal with bugs. I think they were targeted to different audiences... But that's just me.

And if Disney really isn't losing Pixar, GREAT! All the rumors seemed to say otherwise... People just get inflated with success, I think. Like the dudes from Stitch who are leaving Disney to open their own company.
 

GoofyMike29

New Member
Originally posted by Rider

I think Disney is being very smart. They are losing Pixar so they pick up the only other big name in CG.

When are they losing Pixar because I know they have movies scheduled to be released in 2003, 2004, and 2005 with Pixar?
 

NowInc

Well-Known Member
The Disney-Pixar partnership goes much deeper than a contract.

Heres is a (small) list of corporations/companys/people that they "share" and have bonds to (keeping Disney/Pixar together)

Apple
SGI
Alias|Wavefront
Intel
Steve Jobs
Lassater


..and as long as everyone at pixar/disney still hates Katzenberg...there are no worries ;)
 

pheneix

Well-Known Member
>>>They are fffffffffffaaaaaaaaaaar from losing pixar..trust me<<<

I'm gonna disagree with you there. Hell freezes very often in Hollywood, and it often does at the most surprising of times.

Case in point, the woman who directed the Soarin Over California film at DCA defected to Universal to work on Shrek 4D several weeks ago...

>>>Apple
SGI
Alias|Wavefront
Intel
Steve Jobs
Lassater<<<

When given the chance of more money and a better contract, they would run from Disney in a heartbeat. It's not really that they would even have an axe to grind with Disney, that's just how business works, and Dreamworks is the company that signed the $1 billion+ credit line.

>>>and as long as everyone at pixar/disney still hates Katzenberg...there are no worries<<<

They hate Eisner and Schumacher (spelling?) much worse. Especially Schumacher, who has been steadily dismantling animation in Burbank the past few years.
 

pheneix

Well-Known Member
Something I forgot to mention in my above post is that there is a major wild card in all of this right now, and that is Universal Entertainment. Pretty soon they're not going to be a part of Vivendi, and if Barry Diller does lead Universal into a full on invasion into the entertainment industry* (which from what I have been hearing the idea of that is starting to make a few companies anxious), his sights are going to be set on Disney. After he sets Universal's parks up for a full on assault, he's probably gonna want to go after the growing animation industry. What better way to do that than to merge Pixar with Universal Studios, and then use that Winnie the Pooh license that will be up for grabs (because the cards are stacked against Disney with this case) to start making animated movies?

My point is that there are going to be a lot of very exciting opportunities for the hottest company in the reborn animation industry, and many of them don't involve Disney.
 

JLW11Hi

Well-Known Member
Shrek was a very good (hilarious!) film, but I did like Monsters Inc better. I mean, come on. They actually swore in Shrek! :gasp: Ok, not badly, but NowInc was right on the "fart joke" theory. A lot of the movie seemed to rely on that kinda humor. I would compare Shrek more to an Emporer's New Grove type movie than Monsters Inc. We don't always have to pair up CGI movies with other CGI movies.

As for taking over the animation industry................... No one is ever going to "take over" the animation industry. DIsney did it, but basically because no one else ever put an effort into quality animated movies liek Disney did! Finally Dreamworks, some people who finally agree with Disney's entertainment formula, some into the picture and turn animation into a popular form of entertainment for all ages again. Dreamworks and Disney are like the other movie studios. They will always be around.
 

Goofster

Member
I would probably agree with you guys, but I've been here long enough to know that Now knows what he's talking about, especially when it comes to animation and Pixar specifically. But still, I would enjoy hearing more of you thoughts, Now, on Pixar and Disney splitting (or not, as the case may be). I thought Pixar leaving was almost a given.
 

NowInc

Well-Known Member
The animation industry is NOT growing..in fact..its getting worse every month. There are more and more studios shutting down every day...this is not going to assist in the progress of ANY company. Disney suffered from it...thus why they moved most of their animation duties from Cali to Florida.

By the way...Pixar is bound by contract for at least another 3 years...(it goes by the number of movies..and seeing how it takes 4-5 years per movie....yeah)
 

rmforney

Member
Originally posted by pheneix
Studios, and then use that Winnie the Pooh license that will be up for grabs (.



Uh, Winnie the Pooh will not be up for grabs.... some of the domestic licensing is in question with the impending law suit, not the rights to Pooh....
 

pheneix

Well-Known Member
If the original holders to the Pooh license win the case, they will be granted the right to yank the license away from Disney and sell it to any company they wish. And by all accounts, they want to be out of their Disney relationship.
 

rmforney

Member
Yes, but that is only for North America....


If they win they MAY get the rights back. Most likely Disney will be forced to pay $200 million for back royalties


Disney still has the rights from the A.A. Miliane (sp) family for outside the US.....
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom