Disney not considering ride safety?

zapper

New Member
Original Poster
I've been looking at construction on Primeval Whirl and I'm a little concerned that Disney is creating a ride that increases the chance of a guest being hurt.

I read an article over a year ago (from some roller coaster enthusiast magazine) that the mouse-spin roller coaster design has a higher incidence rate of muscle/sprain injury then any other type of coaster (however, it is one of the cheapest coasters to build).

I'm also concerned that the open-air nature of the ride will increase risk due to the ability of intelligence deficient individuals to stand up in the cars beyond the reach/control of the ride operator. Someone standing up in a ride like this will be very likely to be thrown from the car if emergency braking is engaged.

I think that Disney is opening up a whole new can of worms with a ride of this type.

Consider that one of the reasons Skyway was shut down was the increased possibility of guest injury due to the increase in brain matter deficient guest shenanigans/incidents.

Just my 2 cents.
 

NowInc

Well-Known Member
Weeeelll...yes and no...

Its not a "straight out of the box" coaster...Disney is most likley going to add some safety precautions to it to ensure guest safety...the LAST thing they want is more lawsuits...
 

dizpins14

Member
I think the whole Hesters and Chester's was a bad idea to begin with. Expecially the boardwalk type games, Disney is too good to sink to the level of lower end theme parks. The Spin ride is now the 4th in WDW.
 

zapper

New Member
Original Poster
follow-up

The problem in this day and age is that for most corporations it's not a question of if a division makes a profit, but if it's making enough profit. The latest attractions built by Disney (DCA, Aladdin at WDW Magic Kingdom, etc) shows that the company is no longer concerned with maintaining the vision, but rather on the quickest return on investment. It appears that attraction development is now geared to how to build the cheapest rides as quickly as possible in order to start generating revenue. You might counter with Mission Space at EPCOT, but think about how other attractions are delayed in being updated. Eisner's shareholder message shows this attitude in that he really doesn't talk about cutting edge attraction development, but how to enjoy the rewards (I.E. profit) of existing attractions for decades to come.

If you're not willing to take risks in the entertainment industry, you'll never develop those things which will become classics.
 

disneydentist

New Member
Originally posted by dizpins14
I think the whole Hesters and Chester's was a bad idea to begin with. Expecially the boardwalk type games, Disney is too good to sink to the level of lower end theme parks. The Spin ride is now the 4th in WDW.
I have to agree about the games. However, the rest of the world didn't seem to since during our recent visit there were a lot of prize animals being caried around. My kids did like the Triceratops Spin and are looking forward to the coaster. This seems to fit with what they are looking for with the area, ie something for the younger ones at AK.
 

dizpins14

Member
I totally agree that something was needed for kids in AK but all Hester's and Chester's is reused magic. The games may be popular but it looks like Disney is looking for money and not quality. Fantasyland is full of kid friendly rides that are imaginative for example the Pooh ride.
 

Chris

New Member
I don't think safety will be an issue. We have a very similar coaster at a small theme park in Hot Springs, AR that was manufactured by Zamparilla (sp?) which I believe is the same company that is making the Primeval Whirl. If it is truly similar, them the safety is not really a great concern. I understand the reaction of wanting more "thrill" type rides, however, I believe that the parks need a good mix. Each park need things that attract kids, teens, adults, and seniors. That is the only way to ensure that you can keep attendance up at all of the parks. If you take the attitude that all the kids rides will be in Fantasyland, then the other parks would suffer because families would not spend much time (or money) in the other parks. Just like investing, it is all about balance and diversification. I'm certainly not a fan of the carnival games but if Disney can make a few dollars of extra profit to reinvest by setting up some inexpensive games, so be it.
 

NowInc

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by grizzlyhall
I'm sometimes scared to get on Peter Pan...I mean, if it breaks down...there's no where to go!


I know a guy whos "boat" fell off the track and landed on the indians on the mountain.....this was a good few years ago..and I still laugh whenever I see those little guys...
 

General Grizz

New Member
Originally posted by NowInc



I know a guy whos "boat" fell off the track and landed on the indians on the mountain.....this was a good few years ago..and I still laugh whenever I see those little guys...


So was anything destroyed? That would HURT! Contiune this discussion in the new thread in the Academy Awards.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom