Disney Is Again Faulted in Coaster Accident

cherrynegra

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Disney Is Again Faulted in Coaster Accident

* An inexperienced worker's error is called a factor in Big Thunder Mountain's 3rd crash in a year.

By Kimi Yoshino, Times Staff Writer


State investigators said Friday that mistakes by an inexperienced ride operator and a software glitch contributed to an accident last month — the third in less than a year — on Disneyland's Big Thunder Mountain Railroad.

The report from the state Division of Occupational Safety and Health concluded that the unnamed ride operator had been on the job just three days when he performed procedures out of sequence July 8, causing two trains to collide as one returned to the station. Five people suffered minor injuries.

The first accident occurred last September when a car derailed, killing one person and injuring 10 others; the second was in April when two empty cars crashed during a test run. In all three cases, the state faulted the park and ordered retraining.

Friday's report did not address the question of whether the coaster has an ongoing problem. But Susan Gard, a spokeswoman for the state agency, said investigators considered the ride's recent history.

Unlike in the fatal accident, the employee this time was properly trained and the procedures were proper, she said. In the amusement park business, as in any other, "there is always going to be the possibility that a mistake can be made," Gard said.

Disneyland officials said they agree with the report and have taken the action required by the state, which included retraining the operator at fault and fixing the software problem.

"We remain committed to driving continuous improvement and upholding the high standards that keep us at the forefront of ride safety," said Greg Hale, chief safety officer of Walt Disney Parks and Resorts.

One independent expert on Disneyland, "Mouse Tales" author David Koenig, said the run of accidents may be a terrible case of bad luck. But, at a minimum, it creates a perception problem for the park, undercutting Disneyland contentions that
such accidents are extremely rare, he said.

"Disney has run out of its 'one-in-a-million' excuse," Koenig said.

And more than that, some fans who once supported Disney almost unequivocally have lost faith — at least in Big Thunder Mountain, he said.

"This was the first time, in observing decades of accidents at Disneyland, that I heard a large number of otherwise calm, collected, sane people, say, 'I'm never riding that ride again.' "

The latest accident occurred when one train arriving at the station bumped into another. Both were carrying passengers, though only a handful of riders complained of minor aches.

Despite the human error, the computer operating system should have prevented the collision, Gard said.

"It was a small window of opportunity for the error to happen. If he [the operator] would have pressed the button out of sequence at any other place, the accident wouldn't have occurred," she said.

Waiting for Big Thunder Mountain to reopen Friday, many tourists said they have few qualms about getting aboard the ride.

"Disneyland has been around for a really long time, and there have been very few accidents," said Brad Macy, 44, visiting from Walnut Creek with his two children.

"I'm not a big fan of roller coasters, but I think they are fairly safe," he said.

His son, Leor, 12, was more guarded. "It scares me a little," he said. "But I'm going to go on it anyway."
 

figmentmom

Well-Known Member
Interesting. There's an article in this week's New Yorker magazine entitled "How High Can You Go?" about the new generation of exteme roller coasters (including Expedition Everest). In the article, several mentions are made of accidents at Disneyland.

The following paragraphs are quoted directly from the article by Kevin Conley:

"Kathy Fackler, whose five-year-old son, David, lost the toes on his left foot when he climbed out of a car that hadn't fully stopped on Big Thunder Mountain at Disneyland, has made compulsory accident reporting her mission; her Web site, saferparks.org, is the leading advocate for federal regulation and child-safe ride design. At the time of her son's accident, Disneyland enjoyed an autonomy comparable to Disney World's in Florida. "What really bothered me was that no one had to know about the accident," Fackler said. "The park was totally in control. It's almost like you don't live in America. It was that creepy."

Thanks in large part to her testimony five years ago, California enacted model legislation requiring such reports. The first ride closed by the California law was the Roger Rabbit Car Toon Spin, at Disneyland, after a four-year-old boy, Brandon Zucker, suffered permanent brain damage when he fell from his car and was crushed and dragged by the car behind in 2000. (The Zuckers have settled with Disney.) But Fackler believes that the industry has long known about a variety of other child-safety hazards. (END OF QUOTE)
 

xfkirsten

New Member
What they fail to mention in that article about Roger Rabbit's Cartoon Spin is that the family did NOT follow directions. The child was supposed to be seated on the inside, and somehow, that didn't happen, and that's why he fell out (the outside of the car on one side was open air). While I'm not saying this was entirely the guest's fault - they obviously needed a door on that side of the car, which was added - following the rules makes a world of difference. As for the BTMR accident where the boy lost toes, I believe I recall reading somewhere that he was trying to get out of the car before it finished pulling into the station.

And while there are, of course, issues that Disney needs to take care of on their rides, I think many people in their panic are overlooking the fact that many accidents are caused by people just not following the rules.

-Kirsten
 

figmentmom

Well-Known Member
Absolutely, Kristen, I agree - most accidents are caused by people (in this case, guests) NOT following specific directions. And, of course, those are the people who sue... :rolleyes: It was the reporting in this case that caught my eye; I was not implying that Disney had callously and deliberately operated a faulty ride.
 

xfkirsten

New Member
That's kinda what I figured. :) Just goes to show - not reporting all the facts can make an article slant any way you want... :)

-Kirsten
 

figmentmom

Well-Known Member
xfkirsten said:
That's kinda what I figured. :) Just goes to show - not reporting all the facts can make an article slant any way you want... :)

-Kirsten

Yep, that's the power of the press...sorry I gave the impression I was contributing to it.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom