Disney Adopts Majority-Vote Rule

speck76

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Disney Adopts Majority-Vote Rule

By MERISSA MARR
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
August 19, 2005


Walt Disney Co.'s board adopted new rules that will force directors to offer their resignation if they don't receive a majority of votes cast for their re-election each year, a breakthrough for corporate-governance proponents and critics of Disney.

Disney said it had adopted the "majority vote" standard as a means of improving its governance. The rule requires board members failing to win majority support to volunteer their resignation to the board's governance and nominating committee, which in turn would recommend to the full board whether to accept it.

Disney long has been the subject of criticism over its corporate-governance standards and has spent several years trying to patch up the image of its board. That criticism came to a head at Disney's 2004 annual meeting when 45% of the votes cast withheld support for the re-election of Chief Executive and then-Chairman Michael Eisner to the board. Mr. Eisner later gave up his chairmanship. Under the new rule, Mr. Eisner would have been perilously close to being forced to offer his resignation from the board.

Corporate-governance proponents characterized the new rule as an aggressive move by a company not known for proactive governance steps. "This is a very positive development both for Disney, its shareholders and the world of corporate governance at large," said Greg Taxin, chief executive of Glass, Lewis & Co., a proxy-advisory firm in San Francisco. "It's clear this is a proactive step by the Walt Disney Company and one that is very shareholder friendly and that's unusual for the board. This may signal a change in tone and attitude from the board that shareholders should welcome."

In another move, the board amended the company's bylaws to add a provision prohibiting the buyback of any shares at above-market prices from any holder of more than 2% of Disney's voting shares, without shareholder approval.

Majority voting has become the hot-button issue in corporate-governance circles this year. The Council of Institutional Investors estimates that more than 84 shareholder proposals were put forward on the subject in the past proxy season. A pacesetter on governance issues, Pfizer Inc. has been among the first companies to voluntarily adopt the standard.

--Joann S. Lublin contributed to this article.

Write to Merissa Marr at merissa.marr@wsj.com
 

Computer Magic

Well-Known Member
I read this yesterday. Do you think it will really happen if someone doesn't get the majority votes? It doesn't automatically mean they are removed, it just come up to a vote from the board. I think that's how I read it?
 

Shaman

Well-Known Member
Computer Magic said:
I read this yesterday. Do you think it will really happen if someone doesn't get the majority votes? It doesn't automatically mean they are removed, it just come up to a vote from the board. I think that's how I read it?

That's how I understood it as well...it's a good and important move on their part...hopefully the first of many good and promising moves...
 

Connor002

Active Member
interesting

i'd always thought that the majority rule pretty much extended across the board (no pun intended)

i guess there's alot i still don't understand about how buisnesses operate
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom