Peltz may have made a lot of money... comparatively. Certainly if he bought more shares recently to wage his war.
But, he may have also bought shares in the two previous bubbles at near $200. That would mean he's also way down.
In his unmoored from reality case he makes for him and Rasulo being on the Board, he points out the ""loss"" from not getting dividends from the past three years. As if he's owed it.
There's a certain lack of rationality there. Especially if he's courting people who aren't upset about loss of dividends, but who are holding grudges against Iger/Disney, namely Rasulo, Perlmutter, and Musk.
That's what Disney needs: People in charge motivated by grudges.
Restore the Magic!!
